This paper presents a legal memorandum addressed to a university coach, George Baloney, who was dismissed from his position as head coach of both the women's track and volleyball teams. The memo examines the coach's status as an at-will employee, the university's legitimate grounds for termination based on losing records, and the absence of any moral turpitude on the coach's part. Most significantly, it identifies the university's actions as a likely violation of Title IX, given that the dismissal appears to be a pretext for dissolving women's sports programs. The memo concludes by outlining the coach's legal options, including civil litigation and the prospect of financial settlement and reinstatement.
The paper demonstrates applied legal reasoning by mapping factual circumstances onto established legal doctrines — at-will employment, moral turpitude, and Title IX — and predicting litigation outcomes. Rather than simply defining terms, the author applies each doctrine directly to the client's situation, showing the relationship between law and fact that is central to legal analysis.
The memo opens with a brief acknowledgment of the situation and scope of advice, then works through the legal landscape systematically: unfavorable facts first (at-will status, losing records), then favorable facts (no moral turpitude, Title IX violation, evidence of bias), and finally a numbered conclusion summarizing the client's options and likely outcomes. This structure mirrors standard legal memo practice.
To: University President, Board of Regents
Re: Firing of George Baloney
Dear Mr. Baloney,
Thank you for contacting my office concerning your dismissal as head coach of both the women's track and volleyball teams at the university. After some preliminary research into your case, I would like to provide you with a brief overview of your rights and advise you that it would seem worthwhile at this point to consider bringing civil litigation against the university.
First, the unfavorable news. The university does have the option of firing you "for cause." You are an at-will employee, which means that you have relatively few job protections, as is the case for most workers. The fact that you hold a prominent position at the university — due to the importance of athletics to its overall reputation and the support of its alumni — does not shield you from being fired.
The fact that both teams have had losing records since you took over (albeit both have shown improvement under your guidance) is indeed sufficient grounds for the university to dismiss you. Your dismissal, per se, does not constitute a wrong perpetrated against you. If this were the only issue, you would not have a case that the university had committed a tort, and so there would be no likely basis for winning a civil suit.
That said, the rest of the facts are much more in your favor. You have not committed any act that would qualify as moral turpitude, such as violating NCAA regulations, committing a felony, or engaging in an improper relationship with any member of either of the teams. This significantly limits the university's strongest arguments against you.
The major point in your favor, however, is that the university's action appears to be in clear violation of Title IX. Title IX requires that universities provide as much funding and other forms of support to women's sports as to men's. The university president announced at the same press conference that your firing was in all likelihood a precedent to the teams being dissolved. Given this fact, it will certainly be arguable in court — as well as in the preliminary documents that we will file, which may well lead to a settlement rather than proceeding to trial — that your firing was simply a pretext to allow the university to cut funding to women's sports. Such a clear violation of federal law constitutes definite grounds for a lawsuit.
We have additional support for such a lawsuit in that the university president has made a number of statements supporting the importance of male athletic teams, has consistently attended games played by the male teams, and has yet to attend a single game played by either of the women's teams. This is prima facie evidence of bias on his part and will strengthen your position considerably.
In answer to your preliminary questions:
1. Yes, the university can fire you because you are an at-will employee who has arguably performed poorly based on the teams' records.
You’re 82% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.