This paper examines the SPRI Study, conducted by the Swedish Institute for Health Services Department between 1995 and 1999, which investigated computerized patient record (CPR) systems across Sweden's healthcare sector. The paper outlines the study's two primary objectives — establishing comprehensive requirements for health documentation systems and defining supporting administrative routines — and summarizes its methodology, including a nationwide survey of healthcare professionals with a 70% response rate. It then reviews the study's major conclusions regarding process-oriented care, quality indicators, and the development of a unified national patient record, before discussing the broader implications for healthcare information management worldwide.
The SPRI Study was conducted by the Swedish Institute for Health Services Department. Its official name was "Computerized Information Related to the Health Care Sector," and, as its name suggests, it was a study of the computerized health records of Swedish citizens. The study had two primary objectives. The first was to develop "a comprehensive list of requirements that should apply for all health documentation systems in health care, which meant requirements for the functionality of the patient record, and also requirements for the CPR to include support for follow-up performance, costs, and quality of care" (Ball et al., 2004). The second objective was to develop "unified requirements for the supporting surrounding routines that are needed" (Ball et al., 2004). The study was focused on user requirements, so that healthcare professionals using these record systems would have access to better-developed tools.
The study took place between 1995 and 1999. It involved a comprehensive survey of all healthcare professionals in Sweden and achieved an impressive 70% response rate (Ball et al., 2004). The results were then broken down into four different areas: somatic care, primary care, psychiatric care, and all care (Ball et al., 2004). Those results were further divided into subgroups specific to the computer systems in use. After this initial information-gathering phase, the study held a series of seminars aimed at refining the requirements to be fulfilled before any new system was implemented (Ball et al., 2004).
The SPRI Study reached several key conclusions. One was grounded in the idea of computerized records as an important health tool — not simply a means of storing patient information. The concept was that these computerized records would give each provider access to a comprehensive overview of patient health. Another conclusion was that the existing healthcare system was failing to meet quality goals. Although study participants could not agree on which indicators should be used to define quality of care, they did determine that "quality indicators in health care apply to both structure and process" (Ball et al., 2004).
Furthermore, the SPRI Study concluded that the task-oriented approach most providers take is not the best model for delivering healthcare. Instead, the study suggested a process-oriented approach. This is a radical suggestion, because it is "not about making small changes. It is about making radical changes by means of thorough restructuring, which means completely forgetting about existing structures and working methods and inventing totally new ones" (Ball et al., 2004).
Perhaps the most significant conclusion concerned the development of a new patient record system for Sweden. The goal was for all patient information to be presented in a single, comprehensive record, even though patient information had previously been collected across a hodgepodge of different systems with little cohesion. Individual clinics would need to be able to use the results (Ball et al., 2004). The system would have to support daily work with patients and process-oriented healthcare delivery (Ball et al., 2004). Local modular systems could be utilized, but those systems would need to be fully integrable into the broader network (Ball et al., 2004).
"Global lessons and call for national CPR databases"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.