Strain Theory and Crime: Five Scholarly Perspectives
This paper reviews five peer-reviewed studies on strain theory and its variants as they relate to criminal behavior and victimization. Drawing on work by Lin, Cochran, and Mieczkowski (2011); Botchkovar, Tittle, and Antonaccio (2013); Ngo and Paternoster (2013); Walters (2011); and Zavala and Spohn (2013), the paper examines direct and vicarious victimization in juvenile delinquency, the relationship between strain and socioeconomic status, gendered responses to stalking, hate crime motivations, and the overlap between offending and victimization. The review highlights both the breadth of strain theory's application and the gaps that remain in the existing literature.
- Introduction: Introduces strain theory and paper scope
- Victimization and Juvenile Delinquency: Direct and vicarious victimization in youth crime
- Strain, Coping, and Socioeconomic Status: Strain outcomes across socioeconomic classes
- Stalking, Gender, and Emotional Responses: Gendered emotional reactions to stalking strain
- Hate Crimes as a Strain Theory Offshoot: Hate crime definitions and strain theory links
- Deviance, Lifestyle, and Victimization Overlap: Routine activities and offender-victim overlap
- Conclusion: Synthesis of strain theory findings and implications
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Each body section is anchored to a specific peer-reviewed study, giving the literature review clear organizational scaffolding and a traceable evidence base.
- The paper moves logically from individual-level victimization (juvenile delinquency) outward to broader social phenomena (hate crimes, lifestyle overlap), showing the wide applicability of strain theory.
- The conclusion ties together the reviewed studies by returning to the core tension in strain theory: predictive power versus individual variation.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates annotated synthesis — rather than merely listing sources, each study is briefly summarized and connected to a specific dimension of strain theory. This technique shows readers how disparate studies collectively build a larger theoretical picture without requiring the writer to conduct original data analysis.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction that contextualizes strain theory in academic discourse. Five body paragraphs follow, each devoted to one scholarly source and a distinct subtheme: dual victimization and juvenile delinquency; strain across socioeconomic strata; gendered emotional responses to stalking; the definitional and causal complexity of hate crimes; and the lifestyle–victimization overlap. A brief conclusion synthesizes the practical implications of the reviewed findings. The structure mirrors a standard literature review format appropriate for an undergraduate criminology course.
Introduction
Strain theory is a widely discussed topic across public discourse, psychology, and scholarly criminology. Academic search engines are filled with reports, studies, and summaries of strain theory in all of its forms, functions, and offshoots. This paper covers five peer-reviewed works pertaining to strain theory and its variants. The true genesis of what leads some people to become criminals, what leads some people to become victims, and how some people transcend both throughout their lives is the subject of rigorous study. While a complete answer to what causes some people to offend may never be known, certain patterns and trends have been established, and several of those are summarized here.
Victimization and Juvenile Delinquency
One dimension of strain theory involves examining direct and vicarious violent victimization, particularly as a framework for understanding juvenile delinquency and its causes. An estimated 1.7 million children per year experience some form of victimization. A substantial body of research explores the linkage between victimization and delinquency; however, the literature becomes considerably thinner when it comes to vicarious victimization. As the term implies, vicarious victimization occurs when a child is not directly harmed but is instead exposed indirectly to violence — such as witnessing abuse directed at family members or friends. Studies examining the victimization-delinquency relationship, such as those by Sampson and Lauritsen (1990) and Schreck (1999), tend to focus primarily on direct criminal involvement. Factoring in ancillary and indirect victimization is difficult to quantify and measure in terms of effects and causality.
Nevertheless, it is widely accepted that exposure to stressors such as raised voices, witnessed abuse, and proximity to criminal or otherwise harmful environments is not conducive to healthy development. At least one study examining both direct and vicarious victimization found that the presence of both — directed at and in front of a single child — produces a compounding effect. A child who falls victim to this "dual victimization" will tend to experience worse outcomes than one who experiences only one form of victimization (Lin, Cochran, & Mieczkowski, 2011).
References
Botchkovar, E., Tittle, C., & Antonaccio, O. (2013). Strain, coping, and socioeconomic status: Coping histories and present choices. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29(2), 217–250. doi:10.1007/s10940-012-9177-7
Lin, W., Cochran, J. K., & Mieczkowski, T. (2011). Direct and vicarious violent victimization and juvenile delinquency: An application of general strain theory. Sociological Inquiry, 81(2), 195–222. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2011.00368.x
Ngo, F., & Paternoster, R. (2013). Stalking strain, concurrent negative emotions, and legitimate coping strategies: A preliminary test of gendered strain theory. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(3), 369–391. doi:10.1007/s12103-012-9179-x
Walters, M. (2011). A general theories of hate crime? Strain, doing difference and self-control. Critical Criminology, 19(4), 313–330. doi:10.1007/s10612-010-9128-2
Zavala, E., & Spohn, R. (2013). The role of vicarious and anticipated strain on the overlap of violent perpetration and victimization: A test of general strain theory. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(1), 119–140. doi:10.1007/s12103-012-9163-5
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.