Canceling Student Loan Debt for Black Students and Racial Justice
This paper examines the student loan debt crisis in the United States through the lens of racial and social justice, with particular focus on Black students. It traces how systemic racism, slavery's legacy, labor market inequities, and underfunded institutions have left Black students disproportionately burdened by student loan debt. The paper reviews arguments for and against broad debt cancellation, ultimately contending that canceling student loan debt for Black students represents a meaningful form of reparation and a critical step toward closing the racial wealth gap, improving economic mobility, and achieving equitable outcomes in higher education.
- Introduction: Overview of student debt crisis and Black students
- Social Justice in Higher Education: Defining social justice and equity in education
- The Student Loan Debt Crisis: Scale and growth of U.S. student loan debt
- Student Loan Debt Among Black Students: Racial disparities and systemic roots of Black debt burden
- Facing the Student Loan Debt Crisis: Arguments for debt cancellation as racial justice remedy
- Conclusion: Debt cancellation as reparation and social justice
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds a policy argument in a clear social justice framework, connecting macro-level economic data (e.g., outstanding federal student debt exceeding $1.3 trillion) to structural causes like systemic racism and labor market inequities.
- It anticipates and directly refutes the primary counterargument — that debt cancellation would be regressive — using empirical reasoning rather than dismissal.
- It builds logically from the general (social justice in education) to the specific (Black students' debt burden) to the prescriptive (why cancellation is warranted), giving the argument a clear, progressive structure.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses historical contextualization as an argumentative tool. By tracing current debt disparities back to slavery, segregation, and failed reparation efforts like "40 acres and a mule," the author situates a contemporary policy question within a long arc of structural inequality, strengthening the moral and analytical case for targeted debt relief.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad introduction to the student debt problem, then narrows through two focused background sections — one on social justice in higher education generally, and one on the specific crisis of student loan debt. It then drills further into the racial dimension affecting Black students before pivoting to policy analysis. The conclusion ties the threads together by reaffirming debt cancellation as both a social justice measure and a form of reparation.
Introduction
The student loan debt problem is one of the major social issues in the United States education sector. This problem is fueled by various factors, particularly the fact that tuition fees are outpacing students' ability to pay. In addition, the percentage of students taking out loans to finance their education continues to increase rapidly. Policymakers and stakeholders within the education sector are therefore seeking solutions to address the student debt crisis. Many researchers and experts contend that canceling these debts is a suitable solution. However, Black students are seemingly disadvantaged in debt cancellation efforts largely because of past discrimination. This paper explores canceling student loan debt for Black students as one of the ways to promote social justice in higher education.
Social Justice in Higher Education
The field of education has experienced tremendous changes in recent decades due to various factors, including technological advancements and globalization. The adoption of technology into education has generated new educational practices. According to Strait and Nordyke (2015), online learning and service-learning are among the fastest-growing educational practices to emerge in recent decades. While contemporary educational practices continue to attract the attention of learners and educators, promoting social justice in higher education remains a major issue.
Students face a range of contemporary problems that contribute to social justice issues in education. Social justice in education refers essentially to creating educational environments that support all students equitably, regardless of their gender, ethnicity, race, religion, and learning capabilities. In essence, social justice in education implies that all students have equal rights and opportunities regardless of their individual differences (Hlalele, 2016).
Social justice issues are evident in different areas, including university and college access programs and access to funding. Learning institutions are increasingly concerned with social justice problems because of their impact on students' overall learning experiences and outcomes. Higher education institutions recognize the diversity of their members and are committed to creating inclusive communities. By pursuing inclusive environments, universities seek to ensure that all members — including students — have equal rights and opportunities. This commitment is further reflected in institutional efforts to provide equitable solutions to social and environmental challenges.
The Student Loan Debt Crisis
The student loan debt crisis is one of the major social justice issues facing higher education institutions in the United States. At the heart of this problem is the unfair distribution of resources and the inequitable treatment of students. According to Looney and Yannelis (2015), total outstanding federal student debt quadrupled between 2000 and 2014, exceeding $1.1 trillion. During the same period, the number of student loan borrowers reached 42 million — more than double the earlier figure. Default rates also climbed to their highest levels in two decades. As a result, the rise in student loan debt and default rates has attracted widespread concern within and beyond the educational sector. Policymakers and other stakeholders have become increasingly alarmed about the impact of student loan debt on the lives of young Americans.
However, high default rates were expected to decrease in the near future because of several factors, including increased scrutiny, a reduction in the number of non-conventional borrowers, and greater oversight of for-profit institutions (Looney & Yannelis, 2015). It was anticipated that many borrowers facing economic hardships would avoid default through increased enrollment in income-based repayment programs, and that favorable economic conditions would help reduce default rates.
Despite these expectations, recent trends and statistics confirm that student loan debt remains a major social justice issue in U.S. higher education. Ulbrich and Kirk (2017) noted that this debt surpassed $1.3 trillion in 2017 and continues to rise. Tuition increases and students' limited ability to pay have played a major role in this crisis. The high levels of student indebtedness continue to have a significant impact on students' lives — affecting career choices, diminishing quality of life, delaying the achievement of personal financial goals, and limiting their ability to give back to their communities.
Conclusion
Student loan debt remains one of the major challenges to achieving social justice in higher education. Students from low-income backgrounds, particularly Black students, are disproportionately affected by heavy student debt burdens. As the number of student debtors and default rates continues to grow, student loan debt has become a full-blown crisis in the U.S. higher education system. For Black students, this problem is directly connected to systemic racism and past discrimination rooted in slavery. Addressing the student loan debt crisis is therefore an essential component of promoting social justice in higher education. Cancellation of student loan debt for Black students represents a concrete path toward achieving that social justice — offering some form of reparation to Black families who have long been disadvantaged by structural inequities — and would serve as a critical investment in closing the racial wealth gap and supporting equitable educational outcomes.
References
Geiman, J. & Taylor, A.S. (2022). Disproportionately impacted: Closing the racial wealth gap through student loan cancellation, payment reforms, and investment in college affordability. Retrieved July 6, 2022, from https://www.clasp.org/publications/report/brief/disproportionately-impacted-closing-the-racial-wealth-gap-through-student-loan-cancellation-payment-reforms-and-investment-in-college-affordability/
Hlalele, D. (2016). University access, inclusion and social justice. South African Journal of Higher Education, 26(3), 487–502.
Jung, T. (2022). For non-white Americans, canceling student debt is racial justice. NJ Spotlight News. Retrieved July 6, 2022, from https://www.njspotlightnews.org/2022/05/canceling-student-debt-racial-justice-issue-communities-of-color-wealth-gap/
Kuhn, C., Ellis, N. & Grabenstein, H. (2022). Watch: How student loan debt disproportionately hurts Black borrowers. PBS. Retrieved July 6, 2022, from https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/watch-live-how-student-loan-debt-disproportionately-hurts-black-borrowers
Looney, A. & Yannelis, C. (2015). A crisis in student loans? How changes in the characteristics of borrowers and in the institutions they attended contributed to rising loan defaults. The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/looneytextfall15bpea.pdf
Perry, A.M., Steinbaum, M. & Romer, C. (2021). Student loans, the racial wealth divide, and why we need full student debt cancellation. The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/student-loans-the-racial-wealth-divide-and-why-we-need-full-student-debt-cancellation/
Strait, J. & Nordyke, K.J. (2015). eService-learning: Creating experiential and civic engagement through online and hybrid courses. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publications.
The Education Trust. (2021). Black student loan borrowers: College debt is a lifetime sentence that widens the racial wealth gap. Retrieved July 6, 2022, from https://edtrust.org/press-release/black-student-loan-borrowers-college-debt-is-lifetime-sentence-that-widens-racial-wealth-gap/
Ulbrich, T.R. & Kirk, L.M. (2017). It's time to broaden the conversation about the student debt crisis beyond rising tuition costs. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(6). doi: 10.5688/ajpe816101
Williamson, V. (2020). Closing the racial wealth gap requires heavy, progressive taxation of wealth. The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/closing-the-racial-wealth-gap-requires-heavy-progressive-taxation-of-wealth/
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.