This paper examines the evolution of employee training and development across two distinct eras: the traditional approach and the modern era. It begins by defining training and development as human resource activities aimed at enhancing individual and group performance. The paper then compares and contrasts how organizations have shifted from viewing training as an unnecessary expense to recognizing it as a strategic retention tool. Key differences explored include the move from purely theoretical methods to technology-driven, cognitive, and behavioral approaches that leverage tools such as the internet, computer-based training, and interactive demonstrations to build workforce capacity in a globalized economy.
Training and development of employees is an activity performed by human resources departments. It is aimed at enhancing the performance of groups and individuals in an organizational setting. Training focuses on evaluating the performance of an individual while carrying out a given task (Brown, 2002). Training and development is the practice of providing workshops, mentoring, coaching, and other learning opportunities to workers in order to inspire, motivate, and challenge them to perform their assigned tasks effectively.
Training and development provides workers with tools for enhancing their professional growth and for working effectively within their roles. This increases their knowledge and builds personnel capacity to carry out the tasks associated with the positions assigned to them in the organization. This paper endeavors to explain the evolution of training and development and to compare and contrast practices across two distinct eras (Harris & Fleming, 2005).
There has been increased economic globalization and restructuring of economic and political systems. As a result, there has been a corresponding change in the requirements for information and knowledge within organizations.
In the traditional era, most organizations believed that training employees was not a worthwhile investment and that it was prohibitively expensive. They also believed that skilled managers and employees were born, not trained. However, in more recent times, organizations have recognized that training is a retention tool rather than merely a cost. The training systems of most organizations have consequently been restructured to yield better results and create a more capable workforce.
In the traditional approach, companies primarily relied on theoretical methods in the training and development of employees. Practical, hands-on training was often dismissed as a waste of time and money. By contrast, modern organizations have invested in new technologies and techniques that facilitate the dissemination of data, knowledge, and information. Some of these technologies include the World Wide Web, the internet, CD-ROM, video, audio, printed materials, and other forms of electronic media (Brown, 2002).
The emerging economy focuses on knowledge as the primary factor of production. Industries arising in the age of globalization — such as materials science, biotechnology, advanced computing, computer-human interfaces, artificial intelligence, and human genetics — require workers to remain highly trained in technology and science. In the current era, organizations use cognitive methods that provide theoretical grounding to workers. These methods offer rules and frameworks showing how workers are expected to carry out their assigned tasks. They may be written or verbal, and they also target changes in attitude and knowledge through learning.
"Details lectures, demonstrations, and computer-based training approaches"
The evolution of training and development reflects a fundamental shift in how organizations value their workforce. Modern approaches recognize training not as a cost but as a strategic investment in human capital — one that builds the knowledge, skills, and adaptability required to compete in an increasingly globalized economy.
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.