This paper examines the relationship between television violence and aggressive behavior in children through the lens of social learning theory. Drawing on research by Huesmann, Anderson, and others, it outlines both short-term effects—such as priming, arousal, and mimicry—and long-term consequences, including desensitization and entrenched behavioral schemas. The paper considers how age, gender, culture, and socioeconomic factors shape the degree to which media violence influences young viewers. Experimental and observational studies are reviewed to illustrate how repeated exposure to violent content normalizes aggression and how children with pre-existing behavioral and emotional difficulties may be especially vulnerable. The paper concludes with a call for greater childcare awareness and targeted intervention strategies.
The paper uses social learning theory as an organizing framework, applying Bandura's concepts of observational learning, reinforcement, and modeling to interpret empirical findings about media violence. This approach shows how a theoretical lens can unify diverse research findings into a coherent argument, rather than simply listing studies in isolation.
The paper opens with a statistical hook establishing the prevalence of television violence, then defines key terms before separating effects into short-term (priming, arousal, mimicry) and long-term (desensitization, enactive learning, schema formation) categories. It then applies social learning theory explicitly, reviews studies sorted by demographic variable, and closes with policy-oriented conclusions. This funnel structure—from broad context to focused evidence to practical implications—is characteristic of undergraduate social science writing.
Social psychologists regard violence as a serious concern because of its negative impact on the mental development of the young generation. In the United States, children watch television shows in which approximately 60% of content contains some form of violence, and even 40% of those shows consist of substantial violence (Huesmann, 2007). Even video games, a common form of entertainment for children, now incorporate violence that is designed to be exciting and that arouses emotions of aggression. This paper aims to highlight the issue of television violence and its contribution to children's aggression along the lines of social learning theory.
According to researchers, aggression refers to behavior that carries the intention of harming another person. Violent behavior, by contrast, is behavior that inflicts harm on others to the extent that the victim may require serious medical attention (Anderson, 2016). The type of media violence depicted in shows where characters kill each other, harm one another, or use abusive language directly affects the young generation, who often perceive such behavior as "cool" or modern.
The short-term and long-term impacts of television and media violence have been studied extensively. Short-term effects include the immediate copying of aggressive actions recently watched on television, heightened excitable behavior not typical in normal routine, shifts in a child's thinking and emotions toward aggressive patterns, and learning by observing such attitudes and perceiving them as beneficial (Anderson, 2016).
Research findings indicate that short-term effects also include priming, arousal, and mimicry (Huesmann, 2007). Priming can be understood as a form of excitation created from one stimulus within the brain to another, traveling along cognitive, behavioral, and emotional neural pathways. For instance, the sight of a gun can arouse feelings of aggression simply by viewing the weapon. The second short-term effect, arousal, provokes emotional responses on impulsive terms, which can be particularly risky for a young mind. Arousal triggered by, for example, watching a villain attack a hero is not conducive to a healthy young mindset, even when the content is a cartoon. The third effect, mimicry, reflects the human tendency to imitate someone recently observed—much as children humorously imitate their classroom teacher. This same behavioral pattern can emerge after watching television programs that contain violent actions.
Long-term effects of media violence can persist for up to three years and include frequent involvement in physical fights (Anderson, 2016). Long-term effects also encompass social cognitive learning, as explained by social learning theory. The theory holds that children during their formative years observe family members, friends, community members, and even characters they encounter on television (Huesmann, 2007). Behavioral change is driven by shifts in the cognitive schemas they form from the world around them—a process that applies equally to television and other media. Consequently, extensive exposure to violence in television and media is harmful to a child's development. Inappropriate behaviors modeled through aggression and violence on television become embedded in children's behavioral repertoires during childhood and can persist well into maturity, limiting their ability to act acceptably within their social environments.
When negative emotional stimuli are encountered repeatedly—such as viewing a killing scene across multiple films—a viewer's sensitivity to that violence decreases, and it becomes normalized. Emotional reactions diminish, and desensitization occurs (Huesmann, 2007). Another significant long-term learning process is enactive learning, through which children develop the idea that, because villains achieve their goals through violence, they too can get what they want by displaying aggressive behavior toward parents or teachers, for example.
Despite age-appropriate programming guidelines on television and age ratings on video games, children continue to be exposed to highly violent content that is harmful to their social, behavioral, and psychological development. The adverse effects are likely to persist into adulthood, creating difficulties in careers and family life. Children do distinguish to some extent between fictional and realistic characters displaying aggression; however, the responsibility lies with our childcare models. A combination of internal support and external environmental care should be provided to children—particularly those experiencing BED. Children should also be given adequate awareness about the normalization and desensitization of violent behaviors, as addressing these processes is essential to treating children's complex mental health challenges and reducing the consequent burden on families and the broader economy.
Anderson, C. A. (2016). Media violence effects on children, adolescents, and young adults. Health Progress: Journal of the Catholic Health Association of the United States.
Huesmann, L. R. (2007). The impact of electronic media violence: Scientific theory and research. The Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 41(6 Suppl 1), S6–S13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.005
Huesmann, L. R., & Taylor, L. D. (2006). The role of media violence in violent behavior. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 393–415.
Kenyon, B. J. (2002). The effects of televised violence on schools [Master's thesis, Grand Valley State University]. Grand Valley State University ScholarWorks@GVSU. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1591&context=theses
Lan, K. L., Abdullah, M. C., & Roslan, S. (2010). Understanding media violence and the development of aggressive behavior of school children. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.070
Mitrofan, O., Paul, M., Weich, S., & Spencer, N. (2014). Aggression in children with behavioral/emotional difficulties: Seeing aggression on television and video games. BMC Psychiatry, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-014-0287-7
Wiedeman, A. M., Black, J. A., Dolle, A. L., Finney, E. J., & Coker, K. L. (2015). Factors influencing the impact of aggressive and violent media on children and adolescents. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 191–198.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.