This paper examines and contrasts the health policies of the United Kingdom and the United States in addressing obesity, one of the most widespread public health challenges in the Western world. Drawing on data regarding obesity trends, financial costs, and government interventions, the paper analyzes how each country approaches prevention and reduction of obesity rates. Topics covered include U.S. tax-based fiscal policies targeting unhealthy foods, the UK's educational and community-based campaigns, the social stigma associated with obesity, and the structural barriers low-income populations face in accessing healthy food. The paper concludes that both fiscal and behavioral strategies have merit, but that lasting change requires coordinated efforts from governments, individuals, and the food industry.
Obesity is one of the most prevalent health conditions affecting both European and American populations. The ranks of obese individuals grow each year to the extent that obesity is now frequently described as a pandemic, present in both first-world and developing countries around the globe. The purpose of this paper is to observe, compare, and contrast the health policies of the United Kingdom and the United States of America, with special focus on the measures allocated to preventing and reducing obesity rates among each country's inhabitants.
Trends from the past 18 years in the United Kingdom indicate a tremendous increase in the percentage of obese persons. Reports show that 21% of adult women and 17% of adult men are obese, while 56% of the entire adult male population and 46% of the female population are overweight (Banning, 2005). Weight issues extend to younger populations as well, since there is an accelerating tendency toward childhood obesity, which affects 9.6% of girls and 6.5% of boys. A narrower occurrence rate of 70% was recorded among 3–4 year old children between 1989 and 1998 (Banning, 2005).
The financial consequences of obesity in Great Britain are also significant. It has been estimated that £9.7 billion will be spent on obesity-related diseases by 2050 if current trends do not change (Timmins, 2011). The healthcare costs of managing an overweight and obese population in the UK are substantial: each year £9.5 million is spent on treating obesity directly, and £12.5 million on treating its direct consequences — such as type 2 diabetes and various cardiovascular effects due to hypertension, high triglycerides, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Banning, 2005). Combined, these expenses consume up to 1.5% of the National Health Service budget. Indirect costs, represented by sickness absence from work and premature death, result in an additional approximately £2.1 million in annual expenditure (Banning, 2005).
Compared to Great Britain, United States health policy is focused on minimizing the medical and social costs associated with high obesity rates across the country. Federal and state governments have applied certain tax policies designed to encourage individuals to become more physically active and to adopt healthier eating behaviors. This is achieved by favoring the purchase of healthy products through tax subsidies, taxing unhealthy products, and creating tax incentives for physical activity (Efrat & Efrat, 2012).
Admittedly, studies suggest that adopting taxes on unhealthy foods and beverages does not necessarily translate into certain changes in consumption patterns. Nonetheless, following the example of the significant decline in tobacco use — closely associated with increases in tobacco taxes (Efrat & Efrat, 2012) — the majority of policy supporters remain confident that imposing a large excise tax on unhealthy products would significantly modify consumption patterns and thereby influence nationwide overweight trends. Additionally, funds obtained from these taxes could be directed toward supporting effective obesity prevention programs and public campaigns conducive to further reductions in obesity levels among both children and adults.
On the other side of the Atlantic, Britain acknowledges the potential of fiscal policy measures to confront diet-related disease, acknowledging at the same time that the British educational and informational approach has largely failed to address obesity effectively (Nicholls et al., 2011). Even though fiscal measures are being considered as part of a multi-factorial intervention, the general consensus is that it is too early to determine whether the fiscal policies already adopted by nations such as Denmark, Romania, or the United States represent viable solutions (Timmins, 2011). England therefore appears to take a cautious approach, employing alternative measures until long-term results become evident in other countries' programs.
The UK government's public health policy has attempted to counteract obesity through a set of initiatives designed to inform people about the consequences of being overweight or obese, and to monitor average population weights over time. In addition, in order to address "obesogenic environments" (Colls & Evans, 2010), a series of measures has been enacted to improve eating habits and enhance physical activity in targeted communities. These include efforts to improve the quality and content of school meals, as portrayed in the Channel 4 program series Jamie's School Dinners, along with national awareness campaigns such as the NHS's Change4Life, which encourages families to eat well and participate in physical activity, while also allocating funds to designated "Healthy Towns" (Colls & Evans, 2010).
"Fat Studies critique and social discrimination around obesity"
"Income and time constraints limiting healthy food access"
Overall, it is safe to assert that, where differences in food price are to some extent responsible for unfavorable weight trends, the USA's example of setting a tax on unhealthy products could provide a viable means for the prevention of obesity. However, the UK is equally right in contending that fiscal policy's utility has yet to be fully validated. Behavioral and cultural change, on the other hand, remains the most widely implemented long-term goal, requiring the coordinated and coherent efforts of governments, individuals, and the food industry alike.
You’re 72% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.