This paper examines Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and the growing importance of deconfliction in supporting autonomous operations across civil and military airspaces. Beginning with an overview of UAS technology and its evolution from military reconnaissance to commercial and hobbyist applications, the paper identifies key opportunities—such as expanded National Airspace access and autonomous deconfliction capacity—alongside challenges including traffic management and infrastructure gaps. It then explains deconfliction as a process for avoiding mutual interference, distinguishing between strategic deconfliction (pre-flight planning and resource allocation) and tactical deconfliction (real-time in-flight monitoring and conflict resolution). Together, these mechanisms are presented as essential for the safe, efficient, and increasingly autonomous deployment of UAS worldwide.
The global aviation community has experienced significant advancements in recent years. Following these developments, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) have attained a critical mass in this community, and UAS operations have become a critical component of today's global aviation landscape. According to Fern et al. (2011), UAS is increasingly used in combat zones, which has generated mounting pressure and demands on airspace operations. As UAS become more common, their civil and military applications face a growing need to decrease levels of human involvement and supervision — meaning there is an increased demand for operational autonomy. In this regard, deconfliction has emerged as a suitable strategy for promoting that autonomy. This paper provides an overview of UAS and deconfliction in relation to the growing need for autonomous UAS operations in civil and military applications.
UAS (Unmanned Aircraft Systems) is a system comprising aircraft with no onboard pilot, controlled remotely from an operating station (Congressional Research Service, 2016). The aircraft used in this system is sometimes known as a drone or an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). There are three basic types of pilotless aircraft, apart from missiles: aircraft that fly in a repetitive, pre-programmed manner with limited flexibility; aircraft steered remotely from an operating station; and aircraft controlled by onboard navigation systems that maintain direction, altitude, and location. UAS falls under the category of aircraft controlled remotely from an operating station.
UAS applications have become common in civil and military aviation operations in recent years. The public's understanding of this system is largely shaped by the use of drone aircraft by the military in overseas conflicts. Military use of drone aircraft in combat operations can be traced back to World War I and II, when the U.S. Army applied this technology for reconnaissance missions. Since its use in the First World War, UAS has remained an important part of military aviation. Over the past few decades, the use of UAS in civil aviation has gained more attention as rapid technological advancements continue to transform the industry. Currently, unmanned aircraft are sold in hobbyist and commercial marketplaces, though these differ somewhat from military drones. According to the Congressional Research Service (2016), unmanned aircraft in hobbyist and commercial marketplaces use terminology such as "UAS" because they are generally distinct from military drones.
The increased availability and use of UAS in civil operations is attributable to its potential to transform the modern business environment. UAS has the capability to bring significant changes to business operations and to how government agencies function. As a result, many companies and public-sector organizations are increasingly exploring productive and beneficial uses of this system. This trend has been coupled with the design of new generations of UAVs by inventors. The rate of development and deployment of UAS across the globe has increased rapidly in recent years. In the United States, commercial use of this system continues to grow, though UAVs were traditionally reserved for military operations. The rate of development and deployment in the country is also shaped by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations governing UAS applications in commercial and public-sector contexts.
One of the primary opportunities associated with increased UAS development and deployment is the potential to transform public-sector and commercial operations. UAS provides these organizations with numerous ways to enhance their activities, contributing to its growing adoption worldwide. For example, in 2009, nearly 20,000 UAV flights took place in civilian airspace, accumulating more than 2,500 flight hours (Gambold, 2011) — representing a tripling of UAV operations since 2007. A second opportunity is increased access to the National Airspace System (NAS), driven by the emergence of autonomous drones and multi-aircraft control systems. The critical mass that UAS has attained in the global aviation community further enhances the prospects for expanded NAS access.
A third opportunity is autonomous deconfliction capacity, which is essential for the successful deployment of UAV flights in most envisioned application scenarios (Castillo-Effen & Visnevski, 2009). As UAS applications in civil and military airspaces demand growing levels of human participation and oversight, UAS must grow in autonomy to meet that demand. Autonomous deconfliction is also critical to the self-preservation of UAS and for the successful completion of assigned missions.
Despite these opportunities, there are notable challenges. One is the achievement of autonomous deconfliction itself, which is critical for successful deployment in both commercial and military airspaces. According to Castillo-Effen & Visnevski (2009), there is a significant gap between the systematic approaches used for testing and evaluation (T&E) and actual autonomous deconfliction capabilities. This gap creates complexities and difficulties in achieving autonomous deconfliction, making it harder for UAS operators to maintain separation assurance standards while deconflicting with other aircraft (Fern et al., 2011). The challenge also makes it difficult for operators to reduce their workload when managing UAV flights.
The second major challenge is the lack of adequate infrastructure to fully enable and support the widespread use and effective traffic management of UAS. As the number of UAS continues to increase dramatically, the need for better management grows as well (UK Civil Aviation Authority, 2019). UAS traffic management remains a major issue for the global aviation community even as development and deployment continue to rise. While a unified or integrated approach is regarded as a promising technique, effective UAS traffic management remains a significant challenge.
"Definition and scope of airspace deconfliction"
"Pre-flight planning and conflict prevention methods"
"Real-time in-flight conflict monitoring and resolution"
UAS has become significant in the global aviation community. Rapid technological advancements in recent years have facilitated increased development and deployment of UAS. While the system has primarily been used in military operations, it is increasingly developed for commercial and hobbyist markets. The use of UAS in these markets is attributable to its potential to transform the operations of commercial and public-sector organizations. There are many opportunities and challenges associated with the successful development and deployment of UAS. One of these challenges — autonomous deconfliction — is essential to ensure the safe and efficient operation of UAS. As this discussion demonstrates, both strategic and tactical deconfliction are indispensable for safe UAS operations across civil and military airspaces.
You’re 57% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.