This paper critically examines the USDA Food Pyramid, tracing its origins in the 1960s through its most recent revision into "MyPyramid." Drawing on the work of Harvard scientist Walter Willett, science writer Gary Taubes, and the California Dairy Council, the paper outlines six key faults in the pyramid's nutritional guidance and explores how lobbying from agricultural industries has shaped official dietary recommendations. The paper contrasts the USDA's guidelines with Harvard's alternative Healthy Eating Pyramid and concludes that objective, science-based nutritional guidance requires insulation from political and economic pressures.
The triangle printed on most food packages has long served as a nutritional guide for how to eat well each day. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) first developed this pyramid in the 1960s in response to increasing rates of heart disease. Despite the pyramid's revision in more recent years, some scientists, nutritionists, and medical researchers still criticize it for being outdated and providing misinformation to the public.
According to the Harvard School of Public Health, the USDA relied on scientists, nutrition experts, staff members, and lobbyists from food industries to define the food pyramid. In theory, the pyramid should reflect the nutrition advice assembled in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, which the USDA states "provides authoritative advice for people two years and older about how good dietary habits can promote health and reduce risk for major chronic diseases." By law, dietary guidelines must be revised every five years based on the latest scientific research. Federal regulations require that the panel writing the dietary guidelines include nutrition experts who are leaders in pediatrics, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and public health. Panel member selection encourages lobbying from organizations such as the National Dairy Council, United Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Association, Soft Drink Association, American Meat Institute, National Cattlemen's Beef Association, and Wheat Foods Council (Abboud, 2003).
Science writer Gary Taubes, who authored the influential New York Times article "What If Fat Does Not Make You Fat?" published a follow-up book, Good Calories/Bad Calories: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom on Diet, Weight Control, and Disease, in which he analyzes five decades of scientific research on obesity (Mabrey, 2007).
Similarly, Harvard scientist Walter Willett identifies six faults in the food pyramid that he argues are misinforming consumers: the claim that all fats are bad; that all complex carbohydrates are good; that protein is interchangeable regardless of source; that dairy products are essential; the recommendation to eat potatoes freely; and the lack of guidance on weight, exercise, alcohol, and vitamins (Harvard School of Public Health).
The Harvard School of Medicine believes the USDA's revised "MyPyramid" is "the old Pyramid turned on its side," and argues that it does not convey enough information for informed choices about diet and long-term health. Instead, Harvard recommends its own revised Healthy Eating Pyramid, which incorporates research conducted over the past decade that has redefined what constitutes a healthy diet.
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.