This paper examines the utopian visions of Thomas More and John Lennon, tracing thematic parallels across centuries. Both thinkers imagine societies built on reason rather than religion, free from private property and warfare, and founded on collective cooperation. The paper analyzes their treatments of labor, wealth, religious freedom, and peace, while noting key differences—particularly More's acceptance of slavery and sexual rigidity versus Lennon's more inclusive idealism. Despite these variations, both works offer enduring blueprints for human flourishing grounded in the elimination of greed, conflict, and institutional constraint.
Visions of utopia—or more commonly, dystopia—permeate the canon of literature and the arts. Thomas More's Utopia builds upon prior literature on the subject, like Plato's Republic. In More's Utopia, the author builds himself into the work as a character, much as Plato does in his writing. However, More takes Plato's concept of a utopia much farther to provide a rather detailed and comprehensive vision of what an idealized society might look like and how it might function. More's Utopia bases itself on the ideal of reason and presumes a human nature devoid of problems like greed or anger. The central theme in More's Utopia is the minimization of institutions, laws, and structures. While contemporary culture trends more toward dystopic than utopic visions, some artists do remain committed to a presentation of ideals. John Lennon was one such artist. In his song “Imagine,” Lennon sings about a utopia. Like More's utopia, Lennon's is an imaginary world unlikely to manifest but one that may be at least a blueprint or inspiration for human society.
Both More and Lennon imagine a society in which there are “no possessions.” More agrees fully with this sentiment. In Book I of Utopia, More writes, “I must freely own that as long as there is any property, and while money is the standard of all other things, I cannot think that a nation can be governed either justly or happily.” The reason why utopias lack private property can be traced to the problems associated with human greed, jealousy, and possessiveness. Property also creates the potential for social injustice and inequality that can lead to conflict. Thus, the utopic visions of More and Lennon can be interpreted within a Marxist framework. When a small group of people in power come to own the means of production, they need to amass a labor force to support their enterprise. Rather than valuing labor as a function of the value of the goods or services being produced, labor is valued in a more arbitrary fashion. This means laborers are not in control of the value of their labor and can be easily exploited.
As More describes utopia, labor has no monetary value but rather a more direct value in that work contributes to the production of things necessary for survival. A utopia does away with problems like lack or greed because all property is collectively owned. People are entrusted with the ability to share and be kind to one another regarding the need for specific items. There is, as Lennon puts it, “No need for greed or hunger.”
More expands further on the concept of property by delving into issues related to work, labor, and wealth. Work is reframed as labor that gives people joy, as opposed to suffering. In utopia, people are connected with the means of production—namely the raw materials necessary for survival, such as food and agriculture. People take pride in their labor and learn new trades willingly (Book II). No one works too hard, because there is no need for suffering senselessly in this way: “they do not wear themselves out with perpetual toil, from morning to night, as if they were beasts of burden” (Book II). Although Lennon does not go into such specifics in “Imagine,” the lack of possessions, greed, or hunger in the songwriter's utopia does imply an idealized system in which labor has been revalued and where laborers are empowered.
Lennon imagines a world with no heaven, no hell, and most importantly, “no religion.” More's utopia is also free of the constraints of religion. People have a moral foundation built on reason, not religion. The people are free to worship as they please, but the need for superstition has vanished from society. Both Lennon and More suggest that religions have too often served as a precursor to war or violent means of social control. Without religion, there is “nothing to kill or die for” (Lennon). As More points out, people should not be forced to convert to religions. Instead, a utopian society allows people the freedom to believe and worship as they please. For some, this may mean nature-worship or a simple admiration for the beauty of life without needing to ascribe a deity to creation. In Lennon's terms, “above us, only sky.” Freedom of religion is crucial in the utopian vision precisely because the clinging to irrational ideologies creates unnecessary strife, often leading to war.
War is nonexistent in any utopia. More's utopia has no war, as does Lennon's. In More's utopia, the people “detest” it and “would be both troubled and ashamed of a bloody victory over their enemies” (Book II). Nothing is worth the price of war and killing. In a utopia, there is “nothing to kill or die for,” including the protection of national boundaries (Lennon). The various precursors to war, such as fighting over access to resources, fighting over land boundaries, or fighting over religion and ideology, do not exist because the residents of utopia do not believe in war as an answer to disagreements or conflict.
More develops the people of utopia to the point where he does note that conflict is inevitable, and when it does arise, the people do whatever they can to minimize death, destruction, and suffering. Utopian people honor their agreements and keep the peace by refraining from humiliating their enemies or acting in any way that would be construed as a provocation. The philosophy is “live and let live,” or as Lennon puts it, a world in which “all the people” are “living life in peace.” Likewise, the people are “one,” because there are no vehement disagreements over land borders. More creates his utopia as an island to emphasize the trouble with protecting land borders. The concept of respecting others is integral to life in utopia.
"Slavery and sexuality divide their visions"
Therefore, More and Lennon provide a remarkably similar view of utopia, but it seems that Lennon's is more truly visionary and idealistic than More's. More's utopia presents a mixed view of human nature. On the one hand, human beings refrain from greed and are unwilling to resort to war as a first response during times of crisis. Lennon takes the vision of utopia several steps further by imagining a world in which there are truly no crises and where true equality is manifest. Still, utopic visions have not changed much between the time More wrote his Utopia and Lennon wrote his song “Imagine.”
You’re 79% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.