This paper examines the role of values in ethical decision making across personal and professional contexts. Drawing on frameworks including utilitarian, rights-based, and justice-oriented ethics, the paper argues that human civilization depends on shared codes of conduct shaped by cultural, organizational, and personal values. The author reflects on how a personal worldview grounded in social justice has guided decisions involving multicultural competence, workplace ethics, and consumer behavior. The paper also highlights the importance of ethical self-reflection and open organizational systems in resolving value conflicts, particularly in culturally diverse environments.
We live in a highly interdependent and interconnected world, which is able to function in relative harmony because it is governed by mutually agreed codes of conduct. Without the prevalence of such codes of conduct, human civilization would probably degenerate into being ruled by the law of the jungle or the "survival of the fittest." It is therefore evident that human civilization is both a function of and dependent on decisions and actions guided by established ethical standards. This observation holds true for all aspects of life, whether personal or professional.
The fact that human civilization is grounded in ethical behavior also explains why social units such as the family, educational and religious institutions, organizations, and government devote so much attention and energy toward inculcating individual citizens in widely accepted tenets of ethical behavior. By doing so, human society can ensure that the personal, organizational, and cultural values learned will lead to ethical behavior — or "those rules of conduct that direct us to act in a manner consistent with the values we profess" (Mattison, cited in Lewis, 2000).
Yet, as Mattison (2000) points out, it is virtually impossible to pick up a newspaper, magazine, or professional journal today without finding attention drawn to present controversies about moral or ethical issues. These controversies arise because the ethical dimensions of decisions are often complex (Sims, 1994, p. 39), involving not just a straightforward distinction between right and wrong, but a choice of alternatives that may give rise to conflicting values or ethical dilemmas (Mattison, 2000). Such ethical dilemmas occur because an individual's ethical behavior is influenced by his or her cultural, personal, and organizational values (Sims, 1994, p. 3), which may conflict with each other in any given situation or differ from the values of other individuals.
While ethics refers to the rules or principles that define right and wrong conduct, it is not always easy to identify the right answer. However, there are ethical positions — such as the utilitarian, rights-based, or justice view — that can help provide guidance in evaluating the moral consequences of decisions (Sims, 1994, pp. 5–6). My own personal worldview, that decisions should be guided by the principles of social justice, has, I believe, helped resolve some of the ethical dilemmas I have faced in my professional and personal life.
In the first instance, my personal worldview has facilitated the resolution of conflict between my cultural background and that of others. I hold the view that universal values such as peace, goodwill, compassion, understanding, tolerance, liberty, equality, and human individuality supersede any and all other considerations. This worldview has led to the development of a personal value system that embraces the concept of world citizenship and encompasses all cultures and religions.
The ethics view of justice that I hold has also proven particularly useful whenever I face professional decisions that involve conflicts caused by multicultural issues. Being a firm believer in equality and non-discriminatory practices, I ensure that my decisions and recommendations are not influenced by any cultural, racial, or gender bias. I am highly conscious of the need for multicultural competence in an increasingly globalized but culturally diverse workforce and world. As Morales observes:
"A multiculturally competent person is aware of and knowledgeable about cultural differences.... They also examine how social context, power, and systems of privilege and oppression influence and constitute the world, their own worldview, and relationships. This whole process is grounded in a commitment to social justice...." (Morales, 2003)
"Open systems approach reduces cultural bias in organizations"
"Social justice values drive consumer boycotts and support"
"Self-reflection enables fair and socially just decisions"
You’re 51% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.