Wal-Mart's Worldly Mindset Failure in China and Japan
This paper examines Wal-Mart's international expansion into the Chinese and Japanese markets through the lens of Gosling and Mintzberg's "five minds of a manager" framework, with particular focus on the worldly mindset. It argues that Wal-Mart's poor performance in these markets stems largely from its tendency to apply a uniform, globally standardized approach rather than adapting to the distinct cultural values, purchasing habits, and consumer preferences of each market. Drawing on specific examples — including the failure of the "Everyday Low Prices" strategy and the neglect of fresh-food preferences — the paper recommends concrete steps Wal-Mart should take to strengthen its cultural research capacity before entering new markets.
- Introduction: Globalization and the Challenge of Worldliness: Wal-Mart's global growth and worldliness concept introduced
- The Five Minds of a Manager: Gosling and Mintzberg's five managerial mindsets explained
- Wal-Mart's Application of the Worldly Mindset: Wal-Mart's global-over-worldly bias identified
- Cultural Missteps in China and Japan: Pricing, purchasing habits, and food preferences misread
- Recommendations for a Stronger Worldly Approach: Three steps to improve cultural research before entry
- Conclusion: Worldliness essential for Wal-Mart's future market success
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds a business case study in an established academic framework (Gosling and Mintzberg's five managerial minds), giving the analysis theoretical credibility.
- Concrete, specific examples — such as the "Everyday Low Prices" misfire and the fresh-food packaging blunder — make abstract cultural arguments tangible and persuasive.
- The paper moves logically from theory to application to recommendation, maintaining a clear argumentative thread throughout.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies applied framework analysis: it introduces a recognized management theory, isolates the single dimension most relevant to the case (the worldly mindset), and systematically tests Wal-Mart's real-world decisions against that dimension. This technique allows the writer to critique corporate behavior without relying on unsupported opinion, instead anchoring each claim in a cited theoretical standard.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad context on globalization and introduces Wal-Mart as the central case. It then explains the five-minds framework before narrowing to the worldly mindset. The analytical core identifies two categories of cultural misstep — pricing perception and purchasing/food habits — with supporting evidence. A short recommendations section translates the critique into actionable steps, and the conclusion restates the thesis in light of the evidence presented.
Introduction: Globalization and the Challenge of Worldliness
As a result of globalization and trade liberalization, more and more organizations are finding it easier to operate internationally. Success from such international operations does not, however, come easy — organizations are forced to restructure their operations and redesign their products and services in such a way that they are able to respond to the needs of their increasingly diverse client base. People in different countries have different cultures, values, beliefs, customs, and habits. In order to thrive in foreign markets, organizations need to be aware of these differences and ensure that they are effectively captured in their organizational structures and product designs. This appreciation for diversity within other cultures is referred to as "worldliness," and is increasingly being adopted as a source of competitive advantage for businesses operating globally.
Wal-Mart, the world's largest retailer, is perhaps the best reflection of the concept of worldliness in management. Headquartered in Bentonville, Arkansas, Wal-Mart grew from a small discount store in 1962 into the world's largest company, operating in over 70 countries and generating over $250 billion in revenues every year. The company operates three types of outlets — Wal-Mart stores, Sam's Clubs, and Wal-Mart Supercenters — all guided by the core mission of saving people money so they can live better. Approximately one-fifth of its annual revenue stems from its international activity, and it is believed that this success is due, in part, to the company's effectiveness in responding to the diverse needs of its customers (Gereffi & Ong, 2007).
The company has, however, not had a smooth run in implementing its growth strategy. The "Everyday Low Prices" concept, upon which its operations are based, has proven successful in some markets such as Canada and Mexico, but has been a total failure in others such as Indonesia and South Korea (Gereffi & Ong, 2007). In the Chinese and Japanese markets, the company has continued to struggle to establish its presence, almost five years since it first ventured there. These mixed outcomes demonstrate that the company's success formula in different markets is far from perfect. This paper analyzes Wal-Mart's entry strategy into the Chinese and Japanese markets with the aim of showing that much of its poor performance in foreign markets stems from its failure to adopt a worldly mindset, and that its overall profitability could be improved if more resources were committed to research aimed at understanding the cultures of potential markets and their effects on the competitive environment.
References
Changing Winds. (2011). The five minds of a manager: Insights from Mintzberg and Gosling. Changing Winds. Retrieved 3 April 2015 from
Gereffi, G., & Ong, R. (2007). Wal-Mart in China: Can the world's largest retailer succeed in the world's most populous country? Harvard Asia Pacific Review, 9(1), 46–49.
McKinsey Consumer & Shopping Insights. (2012). Luxury without borders: China's new class of shoppers take on the world. McKinsey Consumer & Shopping Insights.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.