White Collar Crime and Sentencing Reform in the Office
This paper examines white collar crime as it manifests in workplace theft and fraud, drawing primarily on Ellen S. Podger's 2007 study, "The Challenge of White Collar Sentencing," published in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. The paper traces the origins of the term "white collar crime" to sociologist Edwin Sutherland, considers the definitional challenges posed by the federal offense-based sentencing framework under Title 18, and explores how statutes such as RICO complicate clear categorization. The paper concludes by evaluating Podger's argument that current sentencing guidelines fail to account for the sociological roots of white collar crime and that alternative, rehabilitative approaches may better serve both offenders and society.
- Introduction: Paper's purpose and scope introduced
- Defining White Collar Crime: Origins and meaning of the term
- Sentencing Challenges Under Federal Law: Title 18 and RICO classification problems
- Alternatives to Strict Sentencing: Rehabilitative approaches Podger recommends
- Conclusion: Summary of Podger's key arguments
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper stays tightly focused on a single source — Podger's 2007 article — and uses it systematically to build its argument, demonstrating how to construct a scholarly review around one primary text.
- It contextualizes the academic discussion with a concrete, accessible opening example (everyday office supply theft versus large-scale fraud), grounding abstract legal concepts in relatable behavior.
- Direct quotations are integrated smoothly and consistently cited, giving the analysis credibility while allowing the student's own framing to guide the reader.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective source-driven argumentation: rather than surveying many sources, it extracts layered analytical content from a single authoritative article. By quoting Podger on definitional ambiguity, statutory complications, and sentencing philosophy, the student builds a coherent critical narrative while maintaining scholarly attribution throughout.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a straightforward three-part structure: an introduction that situates the topic and announces the paper's purpose; a review-and-discussion section that moves logically from definition, to legal complications, to sentencing recommendations; and a conclusion that synthesizes Podger's key takeaways and offers brief evaluative commentary. This mirrors a standard book- or article-review format appropriate for undergraduate criminology coursework.
Introduction
It is common knowledge that some people who work in offices frequently engage in behaviors such as the regular theft of various office supplies — pens, paper clips, and similar items — that might be considered criminal in other settings but are usually overlooked in many white-collar workplaces because "everyone does it." Many of the perpetrators would argue that they are using these materials for work-related activities outside the office. When such behaviors assume truly larcenous proportions, however — as with the Bernard Madoff Ponzi scheme — the same relativity does not apply. White collar crimes of lesser magnitude still cost American businesses an enormous amount of money every year.
In this environment, identifying appropriate and effective ways to prevent theft in the office represents a timely and important enterprise. To this end, this paper provides a review of Ellen S. Podger's study "The Challenge of White Collar Sentencing" (2007) to define white collar crime, identify what types of thefts satisfy that definition, and examine the steps Podger recommends to reduce and prevent such thefts in the future. A summary of the research and important findings is presented in the conclusion.
Defining White Collar Crime
According to Black's Law Dictionary (1990), white collar crime is a term that "signifies various types of unlawful, nonviolent conduct committed by corporations and individuals including theft or fraud and other violations of trust committed in the course of the offender's occupation" (1598). The definition provided by Podger adds important historical context: "Crucial to any discussion regarding white collar crime is an understanding of its meaning. This term was initially a sociological term coined by sociologist Edwin Sutherland, whose theme was to recognize crime committed by individuals in positions of power" (731).
Since its introduction into the field of law in 1939, the term has become associated with a wide range of criminal activities that take place in the workplace but which are by definition nonviolent. The impact of such criminal activities on the corporations in which they occur, and on the stakeholders with investments in them, can be truly profound and severe. In fact, in some cases crimes deemed "white collar" by definition do include certain violent criminal activities as well.
Sentencing Challenges Under Federal Law
To date, U.S. courts have adopted an offense-based approach to sentencing, contained in Title 18 of the federal criminal code, to address white collar crimes. According to Podger, however, "What is particularly problematic about the existing offense-based approach is that there is no list of white collar offenses. Thus, arguing that the act determines the designation but having no clear list of crimes included and excluded leaves one not knowing if a crime should or should not be considered when discussing the topic of white collar crime" (731). Furthermore, a number of offenses included in the federal system exist outside the provisions contained in Title 18, making appropriate sentencing especially difficult (Podger 731).
In this regard, Podger emphasizes that "White collar crime definitions often recognize the economic nature of this type of crime. Key components tend to be 'deception and absence of physical force.' But when examining a criminal statute such as the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), determining whether the offense fits the white collar crime category may be dependent on the specific conduct involved" (731). Indeed, in RICO cases, there may well be elements of violent and even homicidal criminal activity involved, which clearly place the thefts outside the purview of the sentencing regimens established for white collar crimes.
According to Podger, "If the conduct is fraud and the predicate act is mail or wire fraud, it should be designated as a white collar crime. When, however, the RICO predicate relates to a state-based offense such as murder or robbery, it should clearly be outside the realm of being a white collar crime" (731). Consequently, a cursory analysis of the specific controlling statute may not provide substantive guidance as to whether the criminal activity should be handled as a white collar crime. As Podger points out, "The circumstances of the conduct may be equally important in categorizing the activity" (732). These circumstances relate to the position of trust held by the perpetrator. In some cases, acts of theft are committed by an organization's top leaders; in others, they are committed by employees simply seeking personal profit at the company's expense.
Conclusion
Most people would agree that individuals who are in a position of trust and who commit theft from their organizations deserve to be punished. In her study, Podger agrees with this view but cautions that existing sentencing regimens for white collar criminals may be doing more harm than good and have done little to reverse the increasing incidence of white collar crimes in the United States in recent years. While no policymaker or law enforcement authority would likely want to be viewed as being "soft on crime," Podger makes compelling points concerning the need to make the punishment fit the crime. She recommends alternative methods of punishment that take into account the sociological issues that may compel individuals to steal from their companies in the first place.
Works Cited
Black's Law Dictionary. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company, 1990.
Podgor, Ellen S. "The Challenge of White Collar Sentencing." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 97.3 (2007): 731–732.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.