Women's Civil Rights: Obstacles and Struggles in America
This paper examines the key obstacles that women encountered in American history, focusing on the post-World War II era through the mid-1960s. Drawing on DuBois and Dumenil's Through Women's Eyes, the paper identifies three central barriers: labor segregation and domestic containment, racial discrimination targeting Black women in the workforce, and social policing of female sexuality. It then traces the ways women responded to these obstacles through organizations such as the Women's Bureau, the National Manpower Council, and the Women's Political Council, as well as through liberal feminist advocacy and civil rights activism. The paper argues that gendered expectations persisted across race, class, and education levels, requiring sustained collective resistance to achieve any meaningful progress.
- Introduction: Thesis on persistent gendered roles in America
- Obstacles Women Encountered in American History: Labor segregation, racial bias, and sexual policing
- Ways Women Responded to and Overcame Those Obstacles: Activism, unions, and civil rights organizing
- Conclusion: Gendered expectations persist across race and class
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper presents a clear, three-part structure for its central argument, identifying distinct categories of obstacles and matching them with corresponding responses, which makes the analysis easy to follow.
- It grounds its claims in a specific historical period (1945–1965), giving the argument focus and preventing overgeneralization across centuries.
- The paper draws on both primary source material (Betty Friedan's 1963 writing) and a comprehensive secondary text, demonstrating how to use sources to support and illustrate analytical points.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses a parallel structure—presenting each obstacle followed by its corresponding response—which mirrors the cause-and-effect reasoning common in historical analysis. This technique keeps the reader oriented and reinforces the paper's central thesis that women's collective action was a direct and necessary answer to institutional oppression.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a thesis-driven introduction stating its central hypothesis about gendered roles. The body is divided into two main analytical sections: one cataloguing three distinct obstacles (labor segregation, racial discrimination, and sexual policing), and one tracing three categories of response (advocacy agencies, union activism, and civil rights organizing). A brief conclusion restates the thesis with broader reflective commentary, followed by a bibliography citing the primary source text.
Introduction
Getting paid equally to men, gaining fair representation in the workforce, and confronting sexual violence are issues that women have faced since ancient times. This paper hypothesizes that the gendered role a woman is expected to fulfill — regardless of her age, race, or marital status — persists stubbornly, and that women's struggle to change the mentality of a male-dominated society continues no matter how high their education or how broadly modernism has endeavored to reshape public attitudes.
Bibliography
DuBois, Ellen Carol, and Lynn Dumenil. Through Women's Eyes: An American History with Documents. Boston and New York: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2016.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.