CSI Effect The American justice system today is set up in such a way that no criminal can be convicted if reasonable doubt exists regarding the crime. This is particularly important when considering severe crimes such as murder or grand theft. A recent phenomenon that has created a stir in courtrooms, and especially among prosecutors, is the so-called "CSI Effect," which means that a public constantly bombarded by shows such as CSI and the like tend to harbor unrealistic expectations about evidence presented in criminal cases. Furthermore, these same viewers tend to acquit criminals that should be charged for their crimes. In this regard, Donald Shelton's article, "The CSI Effect: Does it really exist?" highlights several important elements, the most important of which is that there have not been any academic studies to investigate the severity of this concern. Furthermore, the article suggests that, while the CSI effect itself is unlikely to have an effect on jurors' decision processes, there is...

This in itself casts doubt upon the existence of such an effect, or if it does exist, whether it affects the juror's actual decision in comparison to his or her non-CSI watching counterpart. While the article suggests that there is no significant difference between CSI watchers and their counterparts in terms of guilty verdicts, one must keep in mind a central weakness of the study. It is a single study of its kind, and possibly even the first of its kind. It includes 1,000 jurors, which is a significant number, but which is also a very small part of the thousands of jurors called to duty…