I believe our money in Iraq would be much better spent in these arenas, which are underserved now, and which have long been under the auspices of relief organizations and the United Nations, among others. Instead of shoving our ideas down other country's throats, I wish we would take a more humanitarian role, and stop trying to convert everyone to democracy and our own way of thinking.
One of Ferguson's arguments for liberal imperialism is the argument that many Third World and evolving nations do not have the resources or even the abilities to govern themselves, and this is certainly a compelling argument. He writes, "Might it not be that for some countries some form of imperial governance, meaning a partial or complete suspension of their national sovereignty, might be better than full independence, not just for a few months or years but for decades?" (Ferguson 170). This statement is reasonable, can be argued, and seems to be fairly benign. Certainly, there are nations who may not be capable of governing themselves for a time. I do not believe that time should stretch into decades, and I do not believe that America should be the only nation who bears responsibility in this case. It seems a group of nations, or a group like the U.N. would be best suited to maintain the peace and promote new governments in these cases, and not one nation, who might be tempted to push their own beliefs and ideals on these emerging nations.
It is quite clear Ferguson has done his research for this text. A respected...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now