Loop Balancing Loop And Reinforcing Loop Understanding Essay

LOOP Balancing loop and Reinforcing Loop

Understanding how systems works constitute one of the most challenging aspects of information technology irrespective of the significance of the phenomena. The aspects of structures and how they are associated with systems is essentially one decisive factor. The way in which various components influence one another depends on the way structures are instituted within a system. Thus, structures are the main determinants of relationships between components. The processes of looping clearly indicate these trends and serve generally to indicate the interaction between productivity with the view of adding to the finished goods inventory. As a matter of fact, this process indicates instances where resources are added or subtracted within certain tasks. The two kinds of looping systems in Information Technology are the balancing loop and the reinforcing loop, all of which are classified into a number of categories. These loops are found in various applications like Skype, a package which enables operators to communicate with one another through the use of VoIP capabilities. These feedback loops are vital for the functioning of Skype, in addition to facilitating its success. Further, they affect each other as they perform and helped Skype generate organizational learning among other things.

Balancing Loop

This feedback loop serves to move states from their current condition to the desired states through the application of some actions. A balancing loop is demonstrative of any condition where there is an objective, which is achieved by the use of some actions. The loop helps in facilitating increments of certain objects or generating new products, a process referred to as the creation of the balancing loop. This loop has a number of instances within it. In the process of creation of a new state, the balancing loop goes through a series of events. For instance, a gap is produced during the instance of interaction between the current state and the desired state (Bellinger, 2004). Balancing loop acts towards the movement of unique, current state or status quo, to the goal or target standard (desired state) through a selected medium or means. This sums the behavioral action of the balancing loop in the process of changing the condition to a better state. The reaction between the current and desired states results into generation of a gap. The objective or goal/desired state is fixed during the process. The gap is the main cause for action. It is, therefore, referred to as the motivational factor. The size of the gap determines the level of action to be implemented in consideration. The action supplements the current action in the process of execution. The size of the current state reduces because much subtraction occurs from the difference between the goal and the status quo.

During this moment of interaction, the desired state is seen as being in a fixed condition. In addition, the actions by which the changes of the state are achieved are motivated, and this is achieved through the difference, which is achieved between the current state and the desired state. Moreover, the degree of the gap determines the predisposition of the loop to generate some action. These two phenomena are directly proportional, and as such, the chances of an action being produced are increased with the increase in the size of the gap. The action is created during the interaction process hence augmenting the current state. At the same time, from the gap, something is subtracted by the current state and as a result, reducing from the gap. The gap is eventually abridged to null, and there occurs no motivation for an action to occur. This, however, happens only in instances where the action is successful in shifting the current state to a point where it is equivalent to zero. In facilitating successful completion of task in Skype, the balancing loop Guarantees the existence of a specific, easily comprehended and accepted characterization of the desired state. It also ensures that there exists an as impartial as possible description of the current state. The balancing loops furthermore facility the existence...

...

This is due to the fact that the actions within this loop are driven by the size of the gap (Bellinger, 2004).
Reinforcing Loop

Reinforcing Loop is the name given to the type of feedback loop. It is where actions generate results, which impact more of equivalent activities. Because of these, the loops cause some growth or decline in behavior. This indicates either positive or negative changes. Some of the common actions for a generic balancing loop include a situation where an addition is witnessed in certain result once some actions have been taken. Subsequently, the result paves way for more of actions of the same kind, which generate the results. An exponential growth usually is the resultant outcome as regarding the events that are facilitated in the up-and-coming performances of the reinforcing cycle. The components of a reinforcing loop include the flow model and the stock. The later represents factors that accumulate in a scenario. This is where results are presented in a specific approach. With respect to the actions of reinforcing loops, the actions govern a flow, which functions as an element for augmenting the stock. As a matter of fact, actions in the reinforcing loop are directly governed by the results. Here, the factor is essentially a value between zero and one. This is employed in influencing the determination of the action by the results.

In facilitating the success of their performance and applications, they support, reinforcing loops, owing to their structures generate anticipated results, a trend which is popularly referred to as the virtuous cycle. When such an instance occurs, the reinforcing loops usually disregard the actions and let them go. In cases where unanticipated outcomes as observed with reference to the actions of the reinforcing loop, the process are usually considered as a viscous cycle. With the occurrence of such undesirable results, one of the feedback loops is usually broken since there are no possibilities to reinforce the structures anymore (Banathy, 1996).

Skype and Organizational Learning

With respect to organizational learning, Skype has been at the forefront of enhancing the activities that surrounding aspect considering the wide array of capabilities and features found within the service. Skype, by enhancing communication between different peers has helped promote the spread of knowledge within different organizational sphere, in addition to enhancing adaptability. It also facilitates the degree upon which ideas and information are exchanged among different society members who have access to the technology. As a matter of fact, applications like Skype and other technologies of the kind are opening up ways in places where barriers of communication initially existed. The digitization of close to all aspects of the work environment has enhanced learning is organization, therefore, easier than it was in the past. Today, people within organizations and departments are continuously emailing one another, chatting, conference calling and texting one another, thanks to the capabilities found in features like Skype. As such, information sharing among different parties within the organization and across organizational departments has become less tedious, more productive and highly advanced.

The efficiency that are produced by the technologies like Skype have brought to the fore tremendous advantages to organization, say in the way time is wasted less considering the limit to which Skype has put to physical movements from one place to another. In addition to enabling learning within the organization to occur at group and departmental levels, the individual aspect of learning has also been enhanced by Skype. Considering the high video conferencing capabilities that the feature contains, the individual within the organization are able to achieve career development of various natures while simultaneously carrying out their studies. Human resources within organizations have been able to accept learning capabilities and facilities like formal…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Banathy, B.H (1996). Designing Social Systems in a Changing World: Contemporary System Thinking, New York: springer publisher

Bellinger, G (2004). Balancing Loop, Retrieved, http://www.systems-thinking.org/theWay/sba/ba.htm


Cite this Document:

"Loop Balancing Loop And Reinforcing Loop Understanding" (2012, June 14) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/loop-balancing-loop-and-reinforcing-loop-110804

"Loop Balancing Loop And Reinforcing Loop Understanding" 14 June 2012. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/loop-balancing-loop-and-reinforcing-loop-110804>

"Loop Balancing Loop And Reinforcing Loop Understanding", 14 June 2012, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/loop-balancing-loop-and-reinforcing-loop-110804

Related Documents

Loops Deckers Outdoor Corporation describes its business as being "a premier lifestyle marketer that builds niche brands into global market leaders by designing and marketing innovative, functional and fashion footwear" (Deckers 2011 Annual Report). Feedback loops were outlined as being an important component of the Burke-Litwin Causal Model (Falletta, 2008). A feedback loops is a set of elements that is self-reinforcing. There are basically two types of feedback loops, balancing

System Feedback Loops of Whole Foods Systems model use two basic feedback loops, so-called Balancing and Reinforcing loops, to illustrate the relationships between growth and goals. This paper identifies one Balancing Loop and one Reinforcing Loop that are critical to Whole Foods Market's performance and success. An explanation of each of these feedback loops, including the causal factors and how they affect each other, is followed by a discussion concerning an

Business Feedback Loops and Organizational Learning at Whole Foods Market To remain competitive and responsive to internal and external pressures, firm need to observe and monitor the outcomes of their activities (Mintzberg et al., 2011). Feedback loops explain the way in which processes may be maintained, or change takes place. In line with other businesses, Whole Food Markets cannot avoid the presence of feedback loops. When the feedback loops are recognized, they

Systemic Thinking
PAGES 6 WORDS 1922

Systemic thinking is the method used to deal with the complex problems and it is used to understand the relationships and pattern within the components of network of relationship. Traditionally, linear relationship focuses on the cause and effect where people view everything in a straight line. However, with interrelationship of dynamic organization and society, linear relationship is inadequate to address the societal and organizational complex problem and linear relationship is

Foreign Policy of China (Beijing consensus) Structure of Chinese Foreign Policy The "Chinese Model" of Investment The "Beijing Consensus" as a Competing Framework Operational Views The U.S.-China (Beijing consensus) Trade Agreement and Beijing Consensus Trading with the Enemy Act Export Control Act. Mutual Defense Assistance Control Act Category B Category C The 1974 Trade Act. The Operational Consequences of Chinese Foreign Policy The World Views and China (Beijing consensus) Expatriates The Managerial Practices Self Sufficiency of China (Beijing consensus) China and western world: A comparison The China (Beijing

Does the Fisher, Ury Model Work
PAGES 120 WORDS 29882

Negotiation Skills A High Impact Negotiations Model: An Answer to the Limitations of the Fisher, Ury Model of Principled Negotiations This study aims to discover the ways in which blocked negotiations can be overcome by testing the Fisher, Ury model of principled negotiation against one of the researcher's own devising, crafted after studying thousands of negotiation trainees from over 100 multinational corporations on 5 continents. It attempts to discern universal applications of