Bessie Head's "Woman From America" Versus Edwidge Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
1066
Cite
Related Topics:

¶ … Bessie Head's "Woman from America" versus Edwidge Danticat's "Night Women" Edwidge Danticat's "Night Women" brings dignity to the life of a woman who is a prostitute. The woman is evidently selling her body to support herself and her young son. Through soaring, poetic language, the reader is able to see that the nameless narrator has an inner life of intelligence and strength. This is not immediately observable in her social world, due to the unfortunate circumstances of the protagonist's exterior life. In the Night Woman's society, she may be an outcast woman, but her thoughts have a richness and a depth that likely goes unseen by her customers. Bessie Head's "Woman from America" also portrays a kind of outcast woman. The woman is not a curiosity due to her sexual lifestyle, but because of the fact that she comes from America. Unlike the prostitute of "Night Woman," the American woman inspires a mixture of awe more than aversion in the gazer.

Both stories are told by unnamed narrators and give a sense of the narrator speaking for a collective, rather than an individual. The "Night Woman" speaks for all women who must sell their bodies to survive. She states that the world is divided between day and night women, and she is one of the latter. Instead of a wife with one husband, she must please many men. Instead of a woman with the security of knowing her child has a father, she must tell the young boy stories about ghostly men who come and leave...

...

However, she tells herself: "I thank the stars I at least have the days to myself" (Danticat 380). But ironically, even when the Night Woman gives thanks for daylight, she thanks the stars, rather than the sun, showing her to still be a creature of the night, trapped in the perspective of the night.
The narrator of "Night Woman" observes herself with a cool, clinical distance, looking at herself with the eyes of a male gazer as she puts on rouge and gazes at her golden skin and small buttocks. She looks with much more tender affection upon her young son, as she worries about his teeth and watches him envelop himself in her blood red scarf. When she observes women going to sell piece-work in the market, the contrast between her fate and their fate is clear -- she is free of the obligations and burdens of the day. The day women make very little money in exchange for a great deal of work. Given her beauty, in contrast to these women, it makes sense for the survival of herself and her son to sell her body on the open market -- and also to avoid the trap of a loveless marriage.

The Night Woman has no illusions about her future prospects. She knows that as her son gets older she must make up new stories to convince him that she is not what she is, and to conceal from him that his father is a random, nameless man. She knows that none of the men who claim to love her feel any real affection for her, although they claim to adore her more than…

Cite this Document:

"Bessie Head's Woman From America Versus Edwidge" (2011, April 06) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/bessie-head-woman-from-america-versus-50362

"Bessie Head's Woman From America Versus Edwidge" 06 April 2011. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/bessie-head-woman-from-america-versus-50362>

"Bessie Head's Woman From America Versus Edwidge", 06 April 2011, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/bessie-head-woman-from-america-versus-50362

Related Documents
Fate and Free Will the
PAGES 3 WORDS 1215

Humbert is awaiting trial for murder, and act of his own free will. No one will argue that Humbert could have made other choices in this case. However, it can be argued whether his sudden coronary in the end was a twist of bad fate, or of good fate. On one hand, it ended his life, on the other; it saved him from life in prison. Lolita's death in

His theory suggests that the ideas themselves take on lives of their own. However, if they are, in their inception, human, doesn't the person who first created them, who first thought them up have the free will to do so? Thus, the arguments made by both Dennett (2007) and the textbook are sound ones, but the idea of free will still has a fighting chance up against these clearly

Oedipus Contribute to His Own Fate Oedipus -- fate vs. free will Ancient Greek philosophy promotes the idea that fate plays an important role in people's lives and that it would be pointless for individuals to attempt to change it. Fate takes on an ironic turn in the Ancient Greek tragedy Oedipus the King, with the central character being fated to encounter both success and misery in his life before it

Free Will Vs. Fate for
PAGES 2 WORDS 583

This makes people superstitious, but, in the same time, it makes them combine fate with free will as they act out of their own free will with the intention to alter fate. Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" describes how superstitious people can contribute to altering fate. Superstitious people are disadvantaged because of their beliefs and because of their absurd theories. Also, the fact that they are superstitious prevents them from acting

Ekstrom 121) The greatest strength of the concept of free will is that it allows evil deeds to be explained as poor conceptions of a weak human mind. The individual abilty to learn and become a greater agent of responsibility seeks a concept of free will to explain how this can be done and with good reason. The individual has no reason to express learning and to grow from human ideas

Therefore, they are compelled to choose what they do in order to instantiate God's foreordainment of history. It wouldn't seem to make sense, therefore, for the person to attempt to change their circumstances or to fight against fate. Affliction, tragedy and evil would be just what God wishes to throw at an individual, who could scarcely escape its occurrence. This seems to suggest a response of futility toward life