Pennell V. State Of Delaware, Term Paper

PAGES
5
WORDS
1776
Cite

O. Or victimology in linking crimes, because criminals often change M.O. As they become more adept at committing their crimes. (Douglass & Munn, 1992). In addition, signatures can be more significant than differences or similarities between victims because "the offender expresses anger through rituals, not by attacking a victim who possesses a particular characteristic or trait." (Douglass & Munn, 1992). The Pennell decision did not decide several related issues. For example, because the trial court limited the scope of the expert's testimony, the higher court did not have to determine whether or not profile evidence would be admissible. Although the Court did suggest that profile evidence would not be admissible, as the science of profiling becomes more advanced, such evidence may become admissible under Del. R. Evid. 702 and under Frye. Furthermore, the Court did not address whether...

...

However, it appears that an expert would be permitted to give such testimony because the jury would already be in possession of the details making up the M.O. Of each of the charged crimes and an expert's specialized knowledge might help the jury understand those facts. However, the State should be cautious about seeking expert testimony regarding M.O. because prominent experts in the field suggest that M.O. is of little value in linking crimes. (Douglass & Munn, 1992).

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Del. R. Evid. 404(b).

Del. R. Evid. 702.

Douglas, J.E. & Munn, C. (1992). Violent crime scene analysis: modus operandi, signature,

And staging. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin.
Web site: http://www.fbi.gov/library/leb/leb.htm


Cite this Document:

"Pennell V State Of Delaware " (2006, November 02) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/pennell-v-state-of-delaware-42064

"Pennell V State Of Delaware " 02 November 2006. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/pennell-v-state-of-delaware-42064>

"Pennell V State Of Delaware ", 02 November 2006, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/pennell-v-state-of-delaware-42064

Related Documents

The history of criminology can be traced back to the 19th Century when theories regarding the origin of criminal behavior and traits were developed by Cesare Lombroso. On the contrary, victimology is a recent scientific discipline that started in Europe after the Second World War as a means of understanding the link between criminals and victims (Lee, n.d.). Focus Points: One of the major differences between victimology and criminology is their

Victimology is the branch of criminology dealing with victim characteristics, victim data, and patterns of victimization. The study of victimology is useful to criminologists for a variety of reasons. Victimology can help show which populations are at greater risk for which crimes, thereby allowing more effective public policies and anti-crime initiatives. Likewise, knowing which populations are at greater risk for which crimes can help law enforcement prevent crimes. Victimology can

" (Sherman and Strang, 2007) Findings include that restorative justice: (1) substantially reduced repeat offending for some offenders but not all; (2) Doubled (or more) the offense brought to justice as diversions from criminal justice; (3) reduced crime victims' post-traumatic stress symptoms and related costs; (4)provided both victims and offenders with more satisfaction with justice than criminal justice; (5) reduced desires of victim for violent revenge on offenders; (6) reduced

The Routine Activities Theory states that crime occurs because specific conditions all come together at the same time (Karmen, 2003). There needs to be an offender who is motivated and a target that is considered to be suitable by that offender. The only other thing needed is an absence of guardians (Karmen, 2003). That last requirement actually occurs quite often, because there are very few places where there is

Victimology The Depressed: According to the Maurer School of Law Protective Order Project (2012), "Children who witness the abuse of their mothers are at in increased risk for emotional and behavioral disturbances, such as withdrawal, low self-esteem," and other disturbances to the individual's self-perception vs. perception of the outside world. An example of how an indirect depressed victim might react would be for a child to stop going out with friends.

If the victim had a blog or home page then we would of course use that to discover more about her lifestyle, personality, and choice of friends. If she had been a member of an online dating service or similar social networks, then we might discover numerous leads. The victim might have agreed to go on a date with a man she met online and that man might be