Fraud is an important consideration in the area of legal contracts because of the fact that if fraud is present in the formation of a contract, the contract can, and mostly will, be invalidated. To establish contract fraud, it must be established that the party committing the fraud knowingly misrepresented a material fact with the intent to defraud and that the opposing party justifiably relied upon such misrepresentation (Blair, 2009). In order for the fraud to affect the contract the effected party must have suffered injury. Without injury the contract will not be affected. In the legal sense, a misrepresentation of a material fact usually means that a party lied about a term of the contract that was essential in the decision making process that resulted in the contract being formed. It is important to distinguish between what constitutes a lie in the formation of a contract and what constitutes what is ordinarily considered mere "puffing." In the negotiation of nearly every contract there are statements made that are opinions and not facts that are used to induce...
Such statements do not constitute fraud. In order to constitute fraud the statement must be clearly factual and rise to the level of being a discernible lie, however, silence can constitute a fraudulent act when a party fails to disclose a hidden defect of which he is aware. To be considered material a fact must be likely to play a significant role in inducing a reasonable person to enter a contract or if the person asserting the fact knows that the other person is likely to rely on the fact.Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now