Financial Fraud Fannie Mae Review Of Fraud Case Study

Financial Fraud Fannie Mae Review of Fraud Schemes within Fannie Mae 1998-2004

Scope

The agency found the fraud understatements of earnings and illegal gratuities that led to accounting violations and inability to meet Wall Street goals.

The investigation of Lee Frakas, executive of a major mortgage company which had dealings with Fannie Mae with hundreds of fake mortgages. The Securities Exchange Commission cited that Fannie Mae had to repay earnings and correct their books for the period 2001 through 2004. This major undertaking will cost the company over $11 billion by SEC estimates. In addition the Department of Justice has conducted a criminal investigation on the board members.

Summary

The top executive managing Fannie Mae were found guilty of illegally reporting accounting information that led to their receiving million dollar payments. Under Fraudulent Financial Statement Schemes this case is one of corruption and financial fraud. The specific areas include Illegal Gratuities, Asset/Revenue Overstatements and Understatements. Accounting records were falsified to satisfy investing partners according to the OFHEO (Oversight Office of Federal Housing Enterprise). The result was a substantial fine of several million dollars (Associated Press, 2006). The investigation by the Oversight Office took nearly three years and the entire overstatement of financial reports totaled a staggering $11 billion dollars (Associated Press, 2006). The Security Exchange Commission also penalized Fannie Mae levying over $400 million dollars in civil fees that are to be repaid to investors. These extensive violations of accounting and financial reporting caused major damage to investors that contributed to nearly crippling of the U.S. Housing market which still has yet to recover.

Many of Fannie Mae's executive board leaders were removed from office in 2004 due to the charges brought against the federal mortgage company (Associated Press, 2006). Earnings were misstated by failure to report accurate numbers by the competing Freddie Mac for over $4 billion dollars...

...

This fraudulent reporting took place for over two years in the period from 2000 through 2002 (Associated Press, 2006).
The auditing committee for Fannie Mae was similarly removed from their positions and new members were hired to review all the accounting books from the late 1990s through 2008.

To add insult to injury $3 billion in fraud was uncovered as an executive at Fannie Mae, Samuel Smith found a loan that had been resold a second time from Bean & Whitaker, which is a Mortgage Company (Schoenberg, 2011). As a government authorized sponsor to cover mortgages, Fannie Mae had discovered a major problem involving Taylor Bean with hundreds more loans that were invalid and had no mortgage insurance coverage (Associated Press, 2006).

The main contact at Taylor Bean that setup these fraudulent deals was Lee Frakas, he was under investigation, however, Fannie Mae continued to accept bad loans.

Summary of Conclusions

In order to make corrections to the current practices in the accounting policies, audit procedures, and corporate structure, the company has agreed to hire in all new management and employees after dismissing all involved in the scandal. A cap has been placed on the amount of growth allowable which has been set at $720 billion (Associated Press, 2006). The number of executives and others dismissed from the company was more than forty. This included the CEO named Daniel Mudd, who is being reviewed by the SEC and may be charged with fines or other disciplinary action (Associated Press, 2006). Fannie Mae never plead guilty to any charges nor did they deny any allegations. Instead the company settled the matter out of court by submitting to a full investigation and agreement to abide by the SEC laws and avoid any further violations (Associated Press, 2006).

The appointed director for OFHEO reports that Fannie Mae was operating under a guise of being the 'best and safest risk in mortgage lending, when in fact it was a facade" says James Lockhart. The reports uncovered a culture where any thing goes as long as the result…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Associated Press. (2006). Fannie Mae manipulated accounting. Retrieved January 19, 2012 from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12923225/ns/business-corporate_scandals/t/report-fannie-mae-manipulated-accounting/#

Schoenberg, T. (2011). Silence on taylor bean opened the way to $3 billion fraud. Retrieved January 19, 2012 from http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/926704/posts


Cite this Document:

"Financial Fraud Fannie Mae Review Of Fraud" (2012, January 21) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/financial-fraud-fannie-mae-review-of-fraud-77572

"Financial Fraud Fannie Mae Review Of Fraud" 21 January 2012. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/financial-fraud-fannie-mae-review-of-fraud-77572>

"Financial Fraud Fannie Mae Review Of Fraud", 21 January 2012, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/financial-fraud-fannie-mae-review-of-fraud-77572

Related Documents

Improvements in Integrity, Financial Accountability, Ethical Conduct and Corporate Responsibilities under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 We passed Sarbanes-Oxley in the wake of the Enron scandal to try to root out financial and accounting irregularities. How could similar irregularities occur at Lehman Brothers? History has a way of constantly repeating itself. -- Joseph Grant 2010 The high-profile corporate shenanigans by Enron and Lehman Brothers have made it clear that tough legislation was

Mortgage Fraud
PAGES 38 WORDS 13949

Mortgage Fraud If a rash of armed bank robberies swept across America next year, and if in these robberies criminals absconded with $30 billion dollars, one may be certain that a public panic would ensue. The banking system would likely be changed forever. If thousands of armed thugs went rampaging across the nation forcing people out of their homes, into the streets, and then destroying the properties, leaving the occupants homeless

Countrywide Accounting Fraud In the year 1969, David Loeb moved to NY from Virginia to begin a home loan and advance organization named as "United Mortgage Servicing." He was joined by his trusted aide Angelo Mozilo. Both shared common dreams of big money and making their presence felt across the nation. The sole owner of the firm, David Loeb had to, under pressure of work, circumstances and colleagues part with half

He defined the ideals that people share about how people ought to behave a "categorical imperative" - a transcendent concept of "rightness of action." No one would want to be taken advantage of the way Countrywide did, and under no circumstances did they themselves believe their actions were "right." Egoism or self-interest ethics may explain the Countrywide rationale, after all, they were acting to advance own interests, over all else.

The proliferation of the internet has threatened to undermine the capacity of real estate agents and brokers to control the dissemination of information in the real estate market. Prior to the inception of the internet and the adoption of its use by the real estate industry, details relative to real property was largely within the exclusive province of the agents and brokers. Multiple listing services, property transfer information, existing

Banking Fees and Morality Integrating Values: The Legal, Moral, and Social Responsibility of the Government, the Banks, and the Consumers Legal Section Statement of Relevant Legal Principles and Rules of Law Application of Law to Topic and Legal Analysis Ethics Section Utilitarian Ethical Analysis Kantian Ethical Analysis Additional Ethical Analysis Social Responsibility Section Introduction to B. Definition of term "Social Responsibility" Application of Social Responsibility Banking fees in one form or another have existed in the United States hundreds of years, however the