Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Yet, this is not to say that they were not conscious of the race with the Russians or the advantages of being able to demonstrate the destructive power of the new super bomb. Yet such a view has not been in doubt by most recent traditional historians, who have seen Truman as a practical statesman with one eye on the post-war world and already dealing with problems with Stalin over Eastern Europe. The administration evidently saw advantages in possessing and even using the new bombs, but the issue was what primarily motivated them to do so in August 1945 (Bastian, n.d.).
Those who dispute in favor of the decision to drop the atom bombs argue that massive casualties on both sides would have occurred in Operation Downfall, the planned invasion of Japan. The U.S. side estimated losing many soldiers in the planned invasion of Japan, although the actual number of expected fatalities and wounded is subject to some debate. President Truman acknowledged after the war that he had been advised that U.S. casualties could range from 250,000 to one million men. Supporters also draw attention to an order given by the Japanese War Ministry on 1 August 1944, ordering the disposal and execution of all Allied prisoners of war, numbering over 100,000, if an invasion of the Japanese mainland took place (Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 2010).
Historical legend indicates that the decision to use the atomic bombs was made in order to provoke an early surrender of Japan by use of an awe-inspiring power. These interpretations have caused some commentators to state that the incident was an act of war terrorism. War terrorism is thought to be the effort to kill civilians in such large numbers that their government is forced to surrender. Hiroshima seems to me the classic case. This type of claim eventually prompted some historians to argue that the practice of terrorism is justified in some cases. Certain scholars and historians have described the atomic bombings of Japan as a form of state terrorism. This interpretation centers on a definition of terrorism as the targeting of innocents to achieve a political goal (Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 2010).
Some people believe based on a detailed examination of all the facts, and supported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved, it has been found that prior to 31 December 1945, and in all probability prior to 1 November 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated (Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 2010).
Other people have just the opposite view. It was suggested that the appropriate thing to do would have been to drop the first bomb out at sea as a demonstration. But based upon facts it can be seen that dropping an atomic bomb 15 miles out at sea would not have caused the Japanese to surrender in order to avoid a worse fate. This is clear because we dropped one on an actual city, and they still did not surrender (the Truth about the Atomic Bombs, 2009). It took the dropping of a second atomic bomb in order to convince the Japanese that we weren't kidding around. It wasn't until after the second dropping they began to take us seriously and eventually surrendered without any further action.
Bastian, Peter. (n.d.). Dropping the Atomic Bomb. Retrieved March 16, 2010, from American
History for Australasian Schools Web site:
Burr, William. (2007). The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II. Retrieved March 16,
2010, from the National Security Archive Web site:
Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. (2010). Retrieved March 16,
2010, from Answers.com Web site: http://www.answers.com/topic/debate-over-the-atomic-bombings-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki
Puller. (2010). Judging Truman's decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan. Retrieved March 16,
2010, from Helium Web site: http://www.helium.com/items/1288455-atomic-bomb-japan-united-states-wwii-president-truman
The Truth about the Atomic Bombs. (2009). Retrieved March 16, 2010, from Pajamas Media
Web site: http://pajamasmedia.com/ejectejecteject/2009/05/19/the-truth-about-the-atomic-bombs-print-version/
Walzer, Michael. (2009). Responsibility and Proportionality in State and Nonstate Wars.
Retrieved March 16, 2010, from Web site:
"Atomic Bombs Even To This" (2010, March 17) Retrieved December 10, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/atomic-bombs-even-to-this-688
"Atomic Bombs Even To This" 17 March 2010. Web.10 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/atomic-bombs-even-to-this-688>
"Atomic Bombs Even To This", 17 March 2010, Accessed.10 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/atomic-bombs-even-to-this-688
Atomic Bomb Historians like Gar Alperovitz and Martin Sherwin have known for many years, based on declassified U.S. government documents that Japan was going to surrender in 1945 even if the atomic bombs were no dropped and that no invasion would ever have been necessary. Their only condition was that the United States "guaranteed the safety of the Emperor Hirohito," and in the end the Truman administration agreed to this rather
Atomic Bomb and Nuclear Power - Blessing or Curse DANNENBERG, Germany, Nov 14 (Reuters) - A force of 15,000 police sealed roads in part of northern Germany on Wednesday in a crackdown against protesters trying to disrupt the final leg of a shipment of nuclear waste. The security operation, one of Germany's biggest in peacetime and likely to cost at least 50 million marks ($22.52 million), entered its third day with
It was much later in 1996 that World Court took up the case of the use of nuclear weapons and declared their use illegal under The Hague and Geneva Convention. "In July 1996, the World court took a stand in its first formal opinion on the legality of nuclear weapons. Two years earlier, the United Nations had asked the Court for an advisory opinion. The General Assembly of the United
" The difference in the Manhattan Project and other companies that were very similar in function was due to the need to become quickly successful and investments of "hundreds of millions of dollars in unproven and hitherto unknown processes and did so entirely in secret. Speed and secrecy were the watchwords of the Manhattan Project." Gosling states that the "one overwhelming advantage" of the project's inherent characteristics because it became
However, the dangers of nuclear explosions were not fully understood, and Miss Atomic Bomb represents the epitome of nuclear testing in the Nevada desert, when bombs were tested above ground and hundreds would flock to Las Vegas to watch for the exploding white light and mushroom cloud. Sexuality goes hand in hand with power, and so, mores were beginning to change in America, the most powerful country on earth. In
This denotes that Japanese culture had been significantly altered both by its defeat at the hands of the United States and by the occupation which were to follow. But in reality, the changes in Japan would only be a first chapter in the narrative of atomic power. Indeed, the devastating detonations on the ground in Japan were a window into a new frontier in making warfare. Indeed, on August 6th, 1945, the world entered a
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's executive order to contain Japanese-Americans in internment camps could have created mistrust in the Japanese and their descendants in the U.S. Such racial antagonism could have made many Americans feel justified to drop the atomic bomb on Japan. Earlier Presidential Statement and Other Motivations The decision to bomb Japan's cities may not be deduced from documents during President Truman's presidency or blamed entirely on President Truman. A