Australian Corporations Act the Corporations Act 2011 Essay

Download this Essay in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Essay:

Australian Corporations Act

The Corporations Act 2011 (Cth) was enacted by the Commonwealth of Australia to regulate transactions at the federal and interstate level of companies in Australia. Regulation of partnerships and managed investment schemes are also covered by the law. The "Corps' Law" may be the largest statute governing business entities in the world. Reforms were instituted in to simplify statute through passage of the Corporate Law Economic Reform Program (Audit Reform & Corporate Disclosure) Act 2004 (CLERP 9). This article provides a brief discussion of several components of the corporate insolvency legislations: Uncommercial transactions, voidable transactions, and unfair preference.

Uncommercial Transactions

Under Section 588FB (1) of the Corporations Act 2001, an uncommercial transaction is said to have occurred if "…it may be expected that a reasonable person in the company's circumstances would not have entered into the transaction…" (Warde, 2009). A Court may determine a transaction that confers no benefit or causes some detriment to a company -- which cannot be explained by what would be considered normal commercial practice -- is an uncommercial transaction (Warde, 2003).

The Court makes a decision about "whether a reasonable person would not have entered into the transaction" in question from an objective position, but the decision must be informed by a "state of knowledge of the company when it entered into the transaction" (Warde, 2003). In Capital Finance Australia Limited v. Tolcher [2007] FCAFC 185, the Full Federal Court considered if a composite set of circumstances constituted an uncommercial transaction of the debtor company, "LSE," an agent of financial companies "Capital companies") ("Addison papers," 2007). A separate financier's application disclosed fraud by the director of LSE, which resulted in mareva (asset preservation) orders against LSE ("Addison papers," 2007). In order to receive payment of several million dollars over several months, including the payout of all equipment agreements, Capital companies insisted that LSE execute a deed to that effect ("Addison papers," 2007). LSE entered liquidation several months later ("Addison papers," 2007) . The Court found that the constellation of steps, including the deed and payments transactions, were uncommercial and therefore voidable on the liquidator's application ("Addison papers," 2007). The grounds for the decision -- and the dismissal of the appeal by the Capital companies -- were that the Capital companies substantially benefitted from the transaction, that LSE executed the deed under pressure from the Capital companies, and that the deed resulted in no real benefits to LSE, and did cause significant detriment to LSE ("Addison papers," 2007).

Voidable Transactions

Transactions that are considered to be uncommercial transactions and insolvent transactions fall into a separate category defined as a voidable transaction (§588FE (3), §588FC). An insolvent transaction must have given unfair preference by the company or it must be an uncommercial transaction of the company. Voidable transactions are said to have occurred if one of four conditions are in place: (1) A company is insolvent when the transaction takes place; (2) The transaction is considered to be the cause of the company's insolvency (§588FC); (3) A winding-up application was filed and the transaction occurred during the 2-year stipulated period; and (4) A voluntary administrator was appointed. Under these circumstances the Court may declare on the liquidator's application that the transaction is a voidable transaction (§588FC, §588FE) (Warde, 2003). In Rivarolo Holdings Pty Ltd. & Anor v Casa Tua (Sales) Pty Ltd. & Ors (1997) 15 ACLC 821, the Court had to consider if an uncommercial transaction was also an insolvent transaction. A transaction in which Casa Tua received assets of $550,000 as compensation for assuming Rivarolo's alleged liabilities. The liabilities were not listed in any previous financial statements, and the source of the debts could not be ascertained. Should the alleged debts be paid, it would mean that the interests of those creditors would be preferred over others. Rivarolo was found to be insolvent as a result of the transaction -- which passed the reasonable person test, as there was "no sensible explanation for the transaction -- if not before the transaction. The Court found the transaction to be uncommercial.

Defenses Applicable to Uncommercial Transactions

The provisions of §588FG include defenses in favor of individuals separate from the relevant company. The Court is bound not to make an order that would materially prejudice an interest or a right of individual who is party to the transaction, under the following conditions: (1) The individual entered the transaction in good faith;…[continue]

Some Sources Used in Document:


Cite This Essay:

"Australian Corporations Act The Corporations Act 2011" (2011, September 28) Retrieved October 25, 2016, from

"Australian Corporations Act The Corporations Act 2011" 28 September 2011. Web.25 October. 2016. <>

"Australian Corporations Act The Corporations Act 2011", 28 September 2011, Accessed.25 October. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Australian Corporate Analysis the Issue Is Whether

    Australian Corporate Analysis The issue is whether Anna and Susanna have the authority to enter into the contract as agents of Leaping Lizard Coffee Emporium. A company's constitution overrides any and all specific policy in governing the company; however, where the constitution directly clashes with the laws, the laws supersede the company's constitution. According to section 5F of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), "Corporations legislation does not apply to matters declared by

  • Australian Business Law the Meaning

    Under the law, this is where the individual is officially receiving the funds (even though they have not physically taken possession of the money). (Taxation Determination 2010) (ANZ Banking Group v FC of T. 94, 2011) Evidence of this can be seen with the court saying, "The Full Federal Court considered that the Accident Compensation Act 1985 (Vic) creates a presently existing liability to make payments in the future from

  • Australian Law on Torts and

    This provision is based on the rationale that general damages do not represent financial loss to the injured person. A number of changes have also been made to the law in respect to assessment of damages for past and future economic loss. 4. The maximum amount of damages for economic loss due to loss of earnings or the deprivation or impairment of earning capacity is fixed at a rate of

  • Corporations to Be Ethical and Responsible Over

    Corporations to be Ethical and Responsible Over the last several years, the issue of corporate ethics has been increasingly brought to the forefront. This is because there has been a transformation in how firms are interacting with various stakeholders. In most cases, there has been a shift in which parties will receive the greatest benefits from particular activities (i.e. The shareholders, board of directors, managers and analysts). This has increased

  • Roles and Responses of Key

    Subsequent AWAs stipulated that the employer had to abide by fundamental regulations dealing with occupational health and safety, workers' compensation or training arrangements. However, the AWA had to adhere to (and was not expected to exceed) the most minimal Australian Fair Pay and Conditions Standard neither did it take dispute resolution procedures into equation. Even though the AWA has been reformed in parts by consequent Acts, the essence remains

  • AUS Corp Law HP Case

    The June 2010 change to the manner in which dividends were deemed payable shifted the requirement from a measure of profit to a balance sheet-based formula in which dividends were only payable if assets outstripped liabilities, essentially. This is, according to the facts of the case as presented, the only reason the dividend payment might be considered insolvent trading or otherwise contrary to the legal and financial constraints of the

  • Carbon Tax in the Australian Legislation the

    Carbon tax in the Australian legislation The threat of global warming is no longer to be neglected and international action is coming to be taken, and even supported by federal institutions. In Australia, the government has focused on the development and implementation of a legislation to tax carbon emissions. The measure has been welcomed with both praises as well as criticism, but its implementation is underway and the benefits would

Read Full Essay
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved