Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Divorced: Policy to Protect the Children of Terminated Marriages
While the unity of marriage is largely viewed across-cultures as the transformation of a loving, adult relationship into the spiritually-supported formal organization of family, its institutional roots must be divided into two distinct subgroups of origin, that of the religious and that of the secular. In the Christian faith, marriage is the formal act of announcing monogamy in partnership on the evangelical path of righteousness before God; in the Jewish culture, it is the formal promise to perpetuate the religion of God's chosen people. Islam, Hindu, Native American, and traditional African cultures are among the multitude that claim a moral significance in the social celebration of religious marriage.
While the universal symbolism is undeniable, its legal application is more complicated. Despite the high esteem in which marriage is held through the lens of religion, in the eyes of the law where policy claims hold stead, its legal legs are only that of a binding agreement from which one can seek annulment. Because the legal strength of marriage, or the formal inclusion of separate assets into one cohesive unit before the Law, is on par with that of a property contract, its annulment as a legal tool is necessary.
"Marriage between two Christians is a public celebration of God's grace and blessing," writes the clergy at St. Jude's Catholic Church in Allen, Texas.
In the course of a romance, when marriage becomes the ideal for which both adults are striving, by making their promise before God to stand together through both the ease and struggles of the future, their commitment to each other is impenetrable -- in the eyes of the Church. The Catholic Church holds that Christianity, the religious roots for most modern Western social tenants, demands an eternal promise of each agent in the marriage process, making its annulment impossible.
Armed with such arguments in hand, the case for divorce becomes a power issue among the religious right occupying Washington, D.C.
At the same time, two facts become pertinent in the discussion of divorce policy. First and foremost, divorce is currently legal in America, all of Europe, Latin America, and most of the Middle East, Asia, and Africa. The legal framework for deciding the cultural mores by which the society of each nation must adhere falls on the backs of the constituting public and its expectations of its government; in America, as is true around much of the world in the ever-expanding global age, the public represented in law by its judiciary, legislative, and executive branches is not homogenous. To the contrary, it is the famous melting pot of cultures where each individual's religious expectations for social standards are represented and important. As such, legalizing the religious preference of anti-divorce lobbyists, like the religious right most symbolized in the St. Jude and other Catholic literature, is an inherent act of unconstitutionality. The separation of religion and government -- church and state -- provides for marriage as an act sanctified by a religious group but only recognized legally as a form of social nomination.
Nevertheless, in recent years, the prevalence of divorce has blossomed worldwide. In the United States, its numbers have so increased that where previously children from so-called "broken" homes were an anomaly in the classroom, it is now standard fare.
Growing up in the non-traditional, non-nuclear family no longer puts a child in the fringe of social make-up, in fact, it is almost normal. The line is drawn at "almost," though, because despite the legality of divorce, the harsh side effects of the detrimental disillusion of the sacred institution have long been protected by religious doctrine in the past. The interpersonal ramifications for which the religious rejection of the concept of divorce provide from an anthropological perspective are no less true today than before; commonality, in turn, does not detract from the problems of divorce, it merely promulgates them in a larger audience.
Among the side-effects associated with divorce are the struggling inner turmoil of the soul, depression, and social castigation. According to a study by the Coalition for Marriage, Family, and Couples Education, divorce offers no solution.
"The study found that on average unhappily married adults who divorced were no happier than unhappily married adults who stayed married when rated on any of 12 separate measures of psychological well-being. Divorce did not typically reduce symptoms of depression, raise self-esteem, or increase…[continue]
"Being Divorce" (2005, November 04) Retrieved October 21, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/being-divorce-69462
"Being Divorce" 04 November 2005. Web.21 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/being-divorce-69462>
"Being Divorce", 04 November 2005, Accessed.21 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/being-divorce-69462
Divorce Rate Improving the Divorce Rate The divorce rate in many modern nations has been steadily climbing in recent generations. This is complex phenomenon that involves many factors and underlying social changes. There are cultural changes that seem to be altering the perceptions of marriage as well as socio-economic changes that also apply stress to many marriages. Despite the trend of an increase in the divorce rate, the benefits of marriage have
In regard to how a child's sense of family is affected by the remarriage of either parent, Ahrons points out that binuclear families have proven to be rather undesirable. This is more so the case given the unusual combination of both blood and non-blood relationships which according to Ahrons could effectively defy clear definition of roles. Findings from this study as the author further points out clearly indicate that children
Divorce is a traumatic experience for a child under any circumstances. They were certainly so in mine, in which several intervening factors complicated the ability to develop effective psychological coping mechanisms. I was nine years old when my parents got divorced. The divorce was not due to mutual consent or irreconcilable differences but the fact that my mother had an affair with my father's best friend, subsequently leaving the country.
The no fault law should be revised, and ensured that the motives for the marriage were investigated at the time of the divorce. If the motives and actions indicate that the marriage would've ended in a divorce eventually, the appeal for divorce should be shot down. Moreover, the newspapers and selected electronic media has a duty to not publicize celebrity divorces as if they are some gallant acts, but
Among the factors which this article elucidates are necessary to be considered, Hetherington et al. indicate that "the long-term effects are related more to the child's developmental status, sex, and temperament; the qualities of the home and parenting environments; and to the resources and support systems available to the parents and child than they are to divorce or remarriage per se." (Hetherington et al., 303) From a clinical treatment perspective,
Divorce and Children In the 21st century the society has undergone a change, for better or worse we cannot really say. Before the mid-60's divorce was rare. Family was integral to the life of individuals and above that children were the main force of society. Miserable couples remained together for the sake of children and held their marriage vows as sacred. For them liberation and freedom came second to the happiness
Moreover, a gradual increase of divorce rate has been found in this period as well. Lyons, Linda. "Gallup Tuesday Briefing." Kids and Divorce 1.1 (2002):1-3. Citing the study of Hetherington and Kelly, Lyons provided a more positive outlook on the effects of divorce as she states that the divorce experience can be a source of empowerment for the children. Lyons also looked at teen's perception and attitude towards marriage and divorce. Mack,