Black Rednecks And White Liberals Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
901
Cite

The reason was because 'north' had 4x more schools than the south (Dutch, 2005). He commented that racism in the north began when ghetto blacks moved to north, being that both whites and blacks were not much comfortable with the redneck culture within their own community. Also, it was due to the migration of the blacks from the South to North after the liberation of the slaves that racism became common in the north as well as there were many black slave holders, particularly in the southern regions of Louisiana (Dutch, 2005).

He further noted on the history of slavery, which according to him was the Western civilization itself that took a stand against slavery around the world, and spent enormous amount of time and effort in order to impel this ideology to free slaves from South America into Africa and throughout the world. In his book he specifically noted that the Britain was the primary force behind this movement.

Furthermore, he highlighted the fact that America was the only country that used the issue of black/white-slavery as a political based on race. However, slavery was never controlled to one race in other countries as well (Amazaon). For example, the Arabs incarcerated Europeans, while Asians imprisoned other Asians. All this is still happening in some parts of Africa.

...

He further commented that being in those some parts of the primary society at hand lag behind in economic terms, they took out their anger on the small segments of society that just moved in and became middlemen by buying and selling goods and become successful.
Conclusion

To conclude, Sowell's "Black Rednecks and White Liberals" is an indispensable guidebook to the state of many Black Americans and most White Liberals. It is suffice to say that this book is just might Thomas Sowell's best work to date on a subject like contemporary racial, cultural and ethnic studies.

Works Cited

Martin, Dutch. A review on "Black Rednecks and White Liberals by Thomas Sowell"

September 2005. Intellectual Conservative.Com. www.intellectual.com

Amazon.com. "Black Rednecks and White Liberals by Thomas Sowell." www.amazon.com

Book review

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Martin, Dutch. A review on "Black Rednecks and White Liberals by Thomas Sowell"

September 2005. Intellectual Conservative.Com. www.intellectual.com

Amazon.com. "Black Rednecks and White Liberals by Thomas Sowell." www.amazon.com

Book review


Cite this Document:

"Black Rednecks And White Liberals" (2007, February 21) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/black-rednecks-and-white-liberals-39906

"Black Rednecks And White Liberals" 21 February 2007. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/black-rednecks-and-white-liberals-39906>

"Black Rednecks And White Liberals", 21 February 2007, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/black-rednecks-and-white-liberals-39906

Related Documents

In addition, they were often enslaved by fellow blacks, capitalizing on the white man's desires, and so, another misconception about slavery is demolished, races did not band together; they worked against each other when enslaving their neighbors. Slavery ended due to several instances, such as nations becoming larger and larger, taking over more territory, and thus reducing the areas available for slave capture. These areas tended to be small and

R's of American Racism: Representation, Rejection, and Realization Racism is a system of meaning that promotes and legitimated the domination of one racially defined group over another. Racism assigns values to both real and imagined cultural and physical differences, benefitting the dominant party and making negative claims about the subordinate, so that this dominance may be justified ideologically. The seeming illogical or even counterproductive nature of racism may be explained in

Sixties Sit-Ins -- 23:12, 15-16 All of the assigned sources seem to have as their major emphasis a support and acceptance of what the sit-ins were meant to accomplish. The writers seem sympathetic to the cause of Civil Rights. However they all seem to frame their subjects in language that misses the real point of any Civil Rights Movement in any era, any country; they also all seem to miss one

Strangers in Their Own Land, Arlie Hochschild presents what she calls the "great paradox" of American society: why ultra conservatives vote against their best interests. By almost all accounts, red states are poorer economically, have much poorer health and educational outcomes, and a lower quality of life overall than blue states. That being the case, why would the reds continue to vote for the same platforms, even going so far