Verified Document

Case Study On Employee Layoff Case Study

Employee Layoff A friend in California has just lost his job in a layoff together with 98 other employees in the same private sector company. The company's administrators have told him that he was included in the recent layoff because of his refusal to take a lie detector test regarding some drugs that were found in his company locker. He also declined to take a drug test since he was afraid that a positive result would make the state child protection agency to take away custody of his children. This situation is an example of a scenario with legal ramifications on the basis of several regulations such as Polygraph Protection Act, Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, Privacy laws, Drug Testing laws, and OSHA.

Generally, the use of lie detector tests in the workplace is not geared towards determining whether an employee is telling the truth but to examine whether the worker's breathing and heart rate change or if he/she sweats. Consequently, an individual who is taking the test can fail if he/she is worried or nervous even if he/she is telling the truth. Moreover, the test...

These tests can primarily be defined as devices used to make a diagnostic opinion regarding a person's honesty such as polygraphs, voice stress analyzers, and deceptographs ("Lie Detector Tests," 2008).
According to the 1988 Employee Polygraph Protection Act, employers cannot have employees to take lie detector in most situations, except in cases where there is reasonable suspicion that a certain employee hurt the firm's business. In relation to employees' privacy, federal and state privacy laws do not require employees to undertake lie detector tests in order to obtain or keep a job. However, employers may require employees to undertake such tests if their actions could have significant impact on their job performance. The privacy laws allow employers to administer such tests as part of their legitimate interest in evaluating employee performance in the workplace. Moreover, employees are allowed to establish drug testing policy and programs especially when there is an employment contract between…

Sources used in this document:
References:

"Employees' Rights in the Workplace." (1999). The Maryland State Bar Association, Inc.

Retrieved May 9, 2014, from http://www.msba.org/departments/commpubl/publications/brochures/workplace.asp

"Lie Detector Tests." (2008). Can My Boss Do That? Retrieved May 9, 2014, from http://www.canmybossdothat.com/category.php?id=269
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Acu San Case Study the
Words: 1470 Length: 5 Document Type: Case Study

Arguments for the assumptions: Pat's and Chris's suggestion that the company develop new products and launch them onto different markets is based on the fact that the recent statistics received from the Marketing Department are unsatisfactory. Evaluating the arguments: The unsatisfactory statistics received from the Marketing Department make a sound argument as the leading position of AcuSan on the market is being challenged by competitors' intense efforts to elaborate new strategies. Another

Employee Rights Safety
Words: 848 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Employee Rights / Safety Employee Rights and Safety: A Case Study The individual in question is now out of a job, due mainly to circumstances that were out of her control. Yes, it is imperative for an organization to punish those who break its policies. Yet, where is the evidence in this case that point to the individual in question? Although the organization she worked for had the right to take action

Resolving Workplace Challenges and Improving Employee Employer Relationships...
Words: 1241 Length: 4 Document Type: Case Study

Temperature Debate It is imperative to appreciate the fact that the Drake and Keeler's employer meets all workplace standards for coverage as stipulated under LMRA. The article states elements of constructive discharge, layoff, discipline, suspension, non-recall from layoff, demote, or adverse actions taken against employees. This is because of the protection awarded to the concerted activities. Damages in a notice lieu include Salary as well as other forms of remuneration

Supervising a Problem Employee
Words: 2245 Length: 8 Document Type: Term Paper

Employee Supervising a Problem Employee An Employee Relations Case Study Supervising a Problem Employee: An Employee Relations Case Study SCENARIO: John Jones is a long-term employee of the Lackawanna Police Department. During his first ten years on the force, John was enthusiastic about his job and was promoted quickly. Within the last year, however, John's performance has deteriorated. He is constantly agitated and is frequently late for work in the morning. His paperwork

Petrie's Layoff on March 20, 1997 and
Words: 831 Length: 2 Document Type: Case Study

Petrie's layoff on March 20, 1997 and Smith's retirement on April 3 of the same year, the number of workers in the glass room was reduced from five to three. The company compensated for the loss of labor by having the remaining employees work overtime hours and using temporary staff. The issue arises from the fact that despite the shortage of workers in May and June, Petrie was not

Someone Has to Go a Tough Layoff Decision
Words: 463 Length: 1 Document Type: Term Paper

Lay Off Decision What criteria should be used to determine potential laid-off candidates? What emphasis, if any, should be given to non-job related factors such as personal problems or a spouse's need to work? Explain. In this situation, it is impossible to use personal situations in order to decide who should be laid off. These issues are too subjective, and it would not be possible for any human being to put

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now