Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Employer/Employee Relationship Issues
The issue that the author of this paper will discuss is employer/employee relations. This issue is an important one for many different reasons. Firstly, the history of labor relations is really the history of civilized society. There has always been tension between the working class and their employers who frequently exploit them. As such, this is a timeless issue that is much more worthy for the author to address than some of the fleeting issues of technology or collegiate cliques that the author could have chosen to analyze.
The functionalist perspective is highly important to examining employer/employee relations. This viewpoint would maintain that relations between employers and their employees provides a critical function in society. Specifically, those who embrace a functionalist perspective would state that it is necessary to have a relationship for these two classes of people in order for society to properly function (Mooney et al., 2007). The core of that relationship is based on the fact that there are those who need to get work done, and their there are those who are willing to labor to complete that work in order to provide for themselves.
Furthermore, the two different roles in employee/employer relationships help to provide critical functions for society as well, those who adhere to this notion would argue. Employers function as a means of using jobs to those who need them. Granting jobs to those who need money is the explicit function that employers provision to society. Therefore,...
As such, employers are authoritarian in their role in the labor relations -- which is required of a society in which a certain function is needed to employ people.
Additionally, there are certain cultural ramifications that those who follow the functionalist perspective of society would attribute to employer and employee relationships. Specifically, training is frequently administered at different jobs in which employers teach employees the necessary skills to succeed. In this respect, employer/employee relations are providing another function for society: the means of disseminating knowledge and helping the very culture of society to progress through learning.
Those who approach the subject of employer/employee relations through the perspective of conflict theory would have a decidedly different viewpoint than those who approach it from a functionalist perspective. The former viewpoint is based on the notion that conflict is an inherent part of society. Additionally, this theory contends that one of the reasons that conflict is necessary is because it helps society to evolve and to ultimately achieve more than it could with the absence of conflict (Iowa, 2016). Thus, those who utilize conflict theory would tend to emphasize some of the tension and points of conflict that traditionally exist -- and which still persist -- between employers and employees.
To their credit, it is easy to…
References
Mooney, Knox, and Schacht. (2007). The Three Main Sociological Perspectives. Retrieved from https://laulima.hawaii.edu / Retrieved from https://laulima.hawaii.edu/access/content/user/kfrench/sociology/The%20three%20Main%20Sociological%20Perspectives.pdf
Iowa State. (2016). The sociological perspective. http://www.soc.iastate.edu Retrieved from http://www.soc.iastate.edu/sapp/socphil235.html
Theories Sociology has been defined s the scientific study of human interaction and, as such, is accepted as a scientific activity (Leming 1997). Social science aims at discovering and explaining observed events of and in nature by means of a framework that can be tested. The goal of sociology is, therefore, to produce a body of knowledge that will provide not only an understanding of the causal processes influencing human behavior
Conflict Theory & Social Control Theory: A Comparison Both conflict theory and social control theory have their similarities and differences. It is important to discuss and address those issues because both theories have been used as a way to talk about the occurrence of crime in contemporary American society. To that end, the effects of positive and negative reinforcement on crime must be considered in both theoretical frameworks. Examples of the
What is different between conflict theories and previous sociological theories are that it theorizes that society evolves based upon conflicts between its groups, rather than striving to mend rifts such groups. Although societal order and peace may be a good thing, it is not inherent to the human, historical condition -- or so suggests conflict theory. Its view of human nature thus tends to be cynical rather than positive or
Sociology Functionalism, conflict theory, and interactionism all pertain to the institution of the family. These are three interrelated approaches that can and should be used together to provide a more accurate view of the family from a sociological viewpoint. Functionalism is a systems perspective, one that views social institutions like the family as being interconnected with other elements of the system like social norms, social class status, and gender identity. Using
Conflict Theory The sociological theory known as Conflict Theory is characterized as one of deviance. In simple terms, it is the idea that "Life is characterized by conflict rather than consensus" (Hamlin, 2004). It is, perhaps some would argue, the state of the world today, both globally, and locally -- at least in the collective imagination of the "oppressed" masses. In truth, there is much in support of the idea that the
Thus their poverty is not a result of their unwillingness to work or their unfortunate decisions. It is a result of the fact that they find themselves at the lowest end of the line in the struggle for resources. Structural functionalism is based on the idea that society is a system. Its cultural, political, and economic parts work together in such a way that people are born into (or alternately