Summary Analysis

Certainly, Moore correctly points out the importance of structure and dialogue. Many educators today accept that notion that when learners are allowed to discuss course content with a personal connection to their lives, the connection between information to knowledge is strengthened and critical thinking skills are sharpened. However, Moore undervalues the value of communication technology to the active learner, likening it to buying a set of new golf clubs in hopes that just one more change of equipment would reduce his handicap. For a variety of reasons, communication technology is just as important as structure and dialogue.

Moore seems to forget that the merging of technologies and knowledge management alongside the rise of 'collaborative projects' within educational circles is what has made the switch to community-centered learning a predetermined reality. As online communication rapidly links our personal...

For example, direct Internet-based audio/video communications like Skype are now available. Blogs usage has dramatically risen over the past couple of years, connecting information and knowledge of an individual to a global community audience who can respond. Hypermedia applications, animation, sound devices, and other technological devices increase the way students can access resources and information. The list goes on and on.
Moore's view of communication technology is only valid if it is evaluated in a vacuum. Instead of dismissing the value of communication technology, Moore should focus on how it can help to more effectively deliver on structure and dialogue objectives.

Bibliography

Moore, M.G. (2004). Constructivists: Don't blame the tools. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), pp. 67-71.