Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from essay:
Maznevski and Peterson (1997) reiterated that culture is important in the provision of an individual's first impression. Studies have indicated that national culture has a lot of influence on the perceptions of individuals, their behaviors as well as their beliefs as noted by Harrison and Huntington (2000) and Hofstede (2001).In order to fully understand the various cultural dimensions; we present Hofstede's cultural dimensions in the next section.
Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions
This theory is based on the work of Hofstede (1980) in his landmark study that involved a focus group derived from IBM employees. He derived a total of four dimensions namely; Individualism, Uncertainty Avoidance Index, Masculinity as well as Power Distance Index. An additional dimension called the Long-Term Orientation (LTO) was later added.
Individualism Vs Collectivism
Individualism denotes the strength of the bond that exists between individuals within a given society. Companies and countries having high individualism are noted to have a dispersed form of link between its people. These companies or countries usually have no form of interpersonal relationships and there is a low distribution of various responsibilities among families, close friends as well as colleagues. There is a high regard for privacy with time as well as freedom being valued by the people.
Individuals with low levels of individualism form bigger as well as stronger levels of group unity. These individuals have a strong focus on the improvement of their skill sets.
Uncertainty Avoidance Index
This refers to the degree in which persons within a given society feel or perceive to be threatened by the unknown/uncertainties. Countries with a high score of Uncertainty Avoidance Index tend to shy away from risky/uncertain situations as much as possible. A lower level means a higher amount of risk tolerance.
Masculinity Vs Femininity
This refers to the degree to which a given society abides by the values, norms as well as traditions of the male as well as female roles. These societies have a distinction in the roles played by different gender groups and these distinctions have an influence on the decisions made in the family as well as community. Countries having a high level of Masculinity Vs Femininity
Index tends to be led by men as the breadwinners and sole providers. The men in these societies are therefore expected to be tougher and stronger than the women.
Power Distance Index
The power distance index denotes the degree to which inequality is tolerated, recognized as well as generally accepted by the individuals possessing as well as lacking power. A high score denotes an unequal distribution of power.
This index demotes the extent to which a given society treats both the long and short-term traditions as well as values.
It is therefore important for every country with multinational operations to effectively institute the cross-cultural management practices in order to prevent possible conflicts in its dealings. Proper cross-cultural management is important in creating proper communication within agiven organizational setting.
Harrison, L.E. And Huntington, S.P. (2000) Culture matters: how values shape human progress. Basic Books, New York.
Hofstede, G. (2001) Cultures' Consequences, 2nd ed., CA: Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. London: Mc Graw Hill.
Hofstede, G.H. (1980), Culture Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values, Sage Publications, London
Javidan, M. And R.J. House (2001), Cultural acumen for the global manager: Lessons from GLOBE. 30th Anniversary Special Issue of Organizational Dynamics,
Kluckhohn, F.R., & Strodtbeck, F.L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, III: Row, Peterson.
Li, X and Wang, Y (2006)Researching on Cross-Cultural Management of Chinese Corporations. International Management Review Vol. 2 (3)
Li, W. (2000). Discuss on cross culture management China: Sichuang University Transaction
philosophy and social science, (1) (pp: 15, 20 
Maznevski, M.L. And Chudoba, K. (2000) Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organisation Science, 11 (5), 473-492.
McCracken, G. (1988), Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to The Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Peter J. Katzenstein, ed., (1966)The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World
Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1966).
Rhinesmith, S. "Going Global from the Inside Out." Training and Development 45, no. 11 (November 1991b): 42-47.
Samovar, LA and…[continue]
"Cross Cultural Management The Concept" (2012, January 03) Retrieved December 10, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/cross-cultural-management-the-concept-48738
"Cross Cultural Management The Concept" 03 January 2012. Web.10 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/cross-cultural-management-the-concept-48738>
"Cross Cultural Management The Concept", 03 January 2012, Accessed.10 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/cross-cultural-management-the-concept-48738
Cross-Cultural Management Although it is a cliche of the business world, it is nonetheless also true that no business that neglects - or abuses - its workers can prosper for long. Badly trained, badly prepared, or badly treated workers do not do their best - and indeed, why should they? The best way to get the most out of a worker is to ensure that that worker feels appreciated and respected,
(Hofstede, 2005, 232) Background of Relativism Dimension A was previously mentioned the idea of cultural relativism in the modern world is based on the fact that colonialism, often seen as an insidious attempt to overrule one culture over another is fundamentally destructive to culture and therefore cannot be applied to business. Individuals and organizations must in the modern world learn to see differences as an opportunity, and overcome the obstacles they
cross cultural management international companies Russia. The paper full compare contrast sources. Start cross cultural management finish Cross cultural management in international companies in Russia Understanding cross-cultural management As the forces of globalization spread out and lead to the creation of culturally diverse workforces, the business community is confronted with the need to develop and implement strategies of cross cultural management. Cross cultural management is generically understood as an administrative act which
Employees to Foreign Country Sending Employees to Foreign Countries Cross-cultural training is essential when companies opt to send employees to foreign countries to accomplish company's objectives. Sending employees without training them on the diverse culture they will encounter is a bad decision, which can lead to accumulation of losses. In addition, the approach used by the company to train their employees, also plays a role in the success of the employee
Cross Cultural Social Stratification There rarely exists a phenomenon that could not be defined in terms of the society and social norms because the social behavior goes hand in hand with every concept associated with living things. The idea of a leader and his follower is present everywhere in every society. Whether it is the boss of a multi-national company having 200 employees underneath him or a president ruling a nation of
Role of Communication in Cross Cultural Management We are engaged in interaction with others all the time in one way or the other at our homes, at our jobsites and in our associations within the community. Irrespective of the fact our understanding with each other the communication is considered difficult. 'Culture' becomes a crucial issue in respect of communicational problems. The methodology for confronting the communication problems and our involvement in
Cross Cultural Age of Globalization The quickening pace of globalization continues to force varying cultures, their expectations, norms, value and practices together at a pace that is much faster than had been the case in the past. This presents a unique series of challenges for managers who must navigate the task of creating an agile enough organization to compete, yet still provide enough structure and stability for objectives to be attained.