Darwinian View of Life Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

River Out of Eden, by Richard Dawkins. The review provides summaries of the main arguments from each chapter, and a discussion, in particular, of the different thresholds mentioned by Dawkins.

The book River Out of Eden is divided into five chapters, entitled The Digital River, All Africa and Her Progenies, Do Good By Stealth, God's Utility Function, and The Replication Bomb.

In the first chapter, The Digital River, Dawkins introduces the idea of evolution by comparing it to a river, metaphorical, and changing over time. The river, he tells us, contains all of the DNA that has survived up until that point, and through the course of time, the river has deviated from its original path, producing different routes for the river, different branches, as he calls them. On each of these different branches of the river, he says, different combinations of DNA have been put together, and different genes have been constructed, giving different forms of life on each of the different pathways.

As Dawkins says, "The river of my title is a river of DNA, and it flows through time, not space. It is a river of information, not a river of bones and tissues: a river of abstract instructions for building bodies, not a river of solid bodies themselves. The information passes through bodies and effects them, but is not affected by them on its way through" (Dawkins, 1995).

Later in the same chapter, Dawkins compares these different genes (or those different sequences of DNA within the different branches of the river) to a computer program. He points out that humans rely on many kinds of signals to carry out our bodily functions, from digital to analog, but he says that the genetic code uses only digital signals: DNA preserves its codes in distinct categories, with only four possible 'categories' (i.e., bases (CGAT)). As he says, "Our genetic system, which is the universal system of all life on the planet, is digital to the core" (Dawkins, 1995). He argues that this digital system is the best system for ensuring error-free replication of the DNA, and goes on to show how the codes made up by the myriad combinations of these bases can produce all of the proteins we need to construct cells, to produce enzymes, basically, all of the elements we need in order to be able to live. He compares the process of building these elements to a computer's start up commands, and shows that through this system, all of the different cells of the human body assume their functions, and correctly carry out their roles within the body.

He explains his idea thus, "Every cell in your body contains the equivalent of forty six immense data tapes, reeling off digital characters via numerous reading heads working simultaneously. In every cell, these tapes - the chromosomes - contain the same information, but the reading heads in different kinds of cells seek out different parts of the database for their own specialist purposes. That is why muscle cells are different from liver cells. There is no spirit-driven life force....Life is just bytes and bytes of digital information" (Dawkins, 1995).

Later, Dawkins explains how it is possible to trace the origins of man, through tracing backwards from each person's mother and father. He says, however, that sex confuses the issue of trying to trace true common ancestors, as sex mixes up the genetic code, therefore confusing the pattern of inheritance, and presenting problems for those people who try to trace the origins of any particular section of DNA. As he says, continuing his river metaphor, "The river is not only uninfluenced by the experiences and achievements of the successive bodies through which it flows. It is also uninfluenced by a potential source of contamination that, on the face of it, is much more powerful: sex."

In chapter two, he points out that using mitochondrial DNA can circumvent these problems, as mitochondrial DNA is passed directly down the female line, and hence not muddled up during sex. He discusses how mitochondrial DNA has been used to suggest the common ancestor of man arose from Africa several hundred thousand years ago.

In the remaining chapters, Dawkins uses clear arguments to explain complex issues in evolutionary biology, such as looking at models of gene survival in terms of economic models, or continuing the metaphor of the river to explain the evolution of complex systems, such as vision, as he does in chapter three.

In chapter four, God's Utility…[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"Darwinian View Of Life" (2003, December 11) Retrieved October 25, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/darwinian-view-of-life-161995

"Darwinian View Of Life" 11 December 2003. Web.25 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/darwinian-view-of-life-161995>

"Darwinian View Of Life", 11 December 2003, Accessed.25 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/darwinian-view-of-life-161995

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Darwinian Ideas How Much Influence

    Such an ascription "both distorts the substance of his thought and grossly exaggerates his actual influence on the politics of his country." He exerted "little influence" on American politics, Trask continues, though Sumner "praised modern capitalism," believed that the doctrine of "laissez faire is just as applicable to society as it is to the economy," for, "the social order," Trask explains, "like the economy, is government by its own laws

  • Knowledge Views on the Nature of Knowledge

    Knowledge Views on the Nature of Knowledge: Social Scientists vs. Natural Scientists What is knowledge? A simple question, or so most people would think. Knowledge is the accumulation of information on a given subject or subjects. It is a collection of facts, of things known to be true...or is it? The closer one looks, the more one comes to realize that there are many different approaches to obtaining knowledge, and many

  • Aquinas View of the Body

    Aquinas would likely not have understood how they could overlook all the "evidence" of God's handiwork all around them, and how they could discount the possibility that the knowledge they were acquiring came through their senses, but that the understanding of that knowledge came from the divine abilities given to them by God. Science and religion generally do not mix, although there are some who feel that both have a

  • Jesus Teachings Prayer & Christian Life He

    Jesus' Teachings, Prayer, & Christian Life "He (Jesus) Took the Bread. Giving Thanks Broke it. And gave it to his Disciples, saying, 'This is my Body, which is given to you.'" At Elevation time, during Catholic Mass, the priest establishes a mandate for Christian Living. Historically, at the Last Supper, Christ used bread and wine as a supreme metaphor for the rest of our lives. Jesus was in turmoil. He was

  • Spencer How Would Herbert Spencer Have Viewed

    Spencer How would Herbert Spencer have viewed post-modern society? Applying the theories of the sociologist Herbert Spencer to modern society may seem, on its surface, a heroically anachronistic effort. After all, Spencer is known for his totalizing attempts to subsume human development into a single overreaching theory of sociological and biological development. Over the course of his writings, Spencer attempted to apply Darwinian biological principles to the evolution of human society. In

  • Origin of Species

    Darwin Had the Enlightenment adequately prepared 19th century readers for Darwin's Origin of the Species? The Enlightenment view of the science of life was neatly summed up by Diderot in his Encyclopedia, in many ways a signature product of the Enlightenment's dedication to setting forth the foundations of human knowledge. As Diderot notes in his prefaratory comments, what we call biology falls under the heading of "Natural History": The divisions of natural

  • Sexual Factors That May Affect

    For instance, according to Begley, "Men who were promiscuous back then were more evolutionarily fit since men who spread their seed widely left more descendants. By similar logic, evolutionary psychologists argued, women who were monogamous were fitter; by being choosy about their mates and picking only those with good genes, they could have healthier children" (2009, p. 52). Although modern men and women may not look like Cro-Magnums, they

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved