Dashboard Evaluation For Medical Portal Essay

PAGES
5
WORDS
1335
Cite

Dashboard Evaluation Patient Satisfaction Scorecard

https://angelmedia.fhchs.edu/compass/dadi490/media/iDashboard/index.html

This dashboard page reviews and specifies how satisfied patients attending the hospital were, or were not, based on the service they received at the hospital. The data breaks down into specific areas of concern for patients in terms of the service they received.

Measurements provided:

There are 24 categories for patient input as to the quality of service they received. The hospital sent out 1,232 surveys and 954 people (former and presumably present patients) responded to the survey (450 males and 504 females; 250 new patients and 704 returning patients). The ages reflect a very diverse community of patients, including: 19 that were 10 years of age or younger; 57 between 11 and 20; 124 were between 21 and 30 years of age; 219 were between 31 and 40; 172 were between 41-50; 153 were between 51-60; 113 were between 60 and 70; and 96 patients were over 70 years of age.

In terms of "Ease of Getting Care," the great majority of respondents rated this aspect as "great," "good," or "satisfactory." However, 4 rated "Hours Center is Open" as "fair" and 4 rated "convenience of location" as "poor" (one can't be sure but those may have been the same 4). Four respondents rated "time in waiting room" as "poor" and 6 rated it "fair." Six rated "time in the examining room" as "fair." 3 indicated that staff was "poor" in explaining "information"; and 3 said staff was not "friendly"; 4 said the building was not "clean"; 2 indicated they were not comfortable or safe while "waiting"; 1 respondent said nursing staff was not "friendly."

The overall summary: the vast majority of patients of all ages were satisfied with service.

Patient Satisfaction

https://angelmedia.fhchs.edu/compass/dadi490/media/iDashboard/index.html

Overview:

This dashboard rates the overall patient satisfaction with the services received in the hospital. The data is presented in several different formats, with enough repetition to make if very clear to the observer what parts of the service were good, and what portions of the service were not...

...

They both reflect that on a scale of 5 to 9.5, the overall rating of the hospital climbed to 8.58, a very respectable indication of overall satisfaction. Below those graphs is a rectangular chart that breaks down the complaints, grievances, and compliments on a monthly basis. For example, in October of 2008, there were 7 grievances, 2 compliments and 19 complaints. In November of 2008, there were 7 grievances, 4 compliments and 20 complaints.
In December, 2008, 4 patients had a grievance, 3 complimented the hospital and 25 complained. In January of 2009, 6 grievances, 2 compliments and 24 complaints were registered. In February of 2009, 9 grievances, 2 compliments and 29 complaints were registered. In March, 2009, 6 grievances, 3 compliments and 17 complaints were lodged; and in April it was 3, 3, and 24 while in May 2009 it was 5, 2, and 17. The identical data is presented on a graph (same data, different media) on the bottom of the page and 3 barometer-style graphics show the average number of grievances, compliments and complaints. However, it is not clear what the three thermometer graphics that are labeled Q1 and Q2 reflect. There is no legend for "Q1" or "Q2."

Overall summary: more complaints occurred in Jan / Feb than in the warmer months.

Patient Management

https://angelmedia.fhchs.edu/compass/dadi490/media/iDashboard/index.html

Overview:

This dashboard is designed to show specific data regarding trends for admissions to the hospital, trends for discharges, and trends that reflect the length of stay for patients. In a general sense it appears from the graphics presented that in the year 2007, more patients were admitted and discharges in the months of July and August, and in January and February. That is a generalization, but clearly the length of stay does not follow similar patterns.

Measurements Provided:

In July, 2007, the hospital admitted 311 patients and in August 2007 the hospital discharged 315 patients. The admissions in September (246) nearly…

Sources Used in Documents:

One of the immediate things that nurses and other healthcare professions do when a new patient arrives is to give that person aspirin. This was done 100% of the time in January, 2009. And 87% of the patients received aspirin (prescribed at discharge). Patients with heart trouble were given ACEI or ARB for their left ventricle systolic dysfunction (90% of the patients) and counseling for people who smoke cigarettes was given 67% of the patients in 2009. The list is quite long but of particular interest is influenza vaccination (75% of patients received it), blood cultures were taken for 78% of the patients, and 76% of patients that had undergone colorectal surgery received "immediate postoperative normothermia."

As to the how this hospital's core measures stack up on a national basis, the barometer graph on the lower right side of this dashboard shows that this hospital meets national averages 80% of the time.

Overall Summary: When a hospital goes to the trouble of presenting specific data regarding how it serves its patients -- and this should be required / expected in today's healthcare environment -- any potential or past patient can easily see the thoroughness therein.


Cite this Document:

"Dashboard Evaluation For Medical Portal" (2011, November 18) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/dashboard-evaluation-patient-satisfaction-52947

"Dashboard Evaluation For Medical Portal" 18 November 2011. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/dashboard-evaluation-patient-satisfaction-52947>

"Dashboard Evaluation For Medical Portal", 18 November 2011, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/dashboard-evaluation-patient-satisfaction-52947

Related Documents

Growth Aided by Data Warehousing Adaptability of data warehousing to changes Using existing data effectively can lead to growth Uses of data warehouses for Public Service Getting investment through data warehouse Using Data Warehouse for Business Information Ongoing changes in Data Warehousing The Origin of Data Warehousing and its current importance Relationship between new operating system and data warehousing Developing Organizations through Data Warehousing Telephone and Data Warehousing Choose your own partner Data Warehousing for Societal Causes Updating inaccessible data Data warehousing for investors Usefulness

Second, the data will be analyzed using the software application, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows, Version 13. Statistical measures of correlation of it spending, including controlling for early adoption of SOA platforms, will be entered into the analysis. Finally, the results will be analyzed and recommendations made on specific strategies for attaining higher levels of efficiency in both patient care and operational contexts based on

Lung Cancer As Compared to
PAGES 3 WORDS 1374

Provide a rationale and support for your recommendations. Radon: A story of radon-related lung cancer in Minnesota was publicized to thousands of viewers via media followed by the Minnesota-legislature passing a law that required radon-resistant construction in all new homes. Similar legislation was passed in Illinois. Pennsylvania can adopt a similar stance preceding the legislation with widespread publicity in order to educate the public about the matter. Steps should also be taken

CENTRICITY EMR Part 1 Product Profile (Features and Benefits) In essence, Centricity Practice Solution could be defined as “a comprehensive Electronic Medical Record (EMR), Practice Management, Population Health, and Analytics, and Connectivity solution designed to help you enhance the clinical, operational, and financial productivity of your ambulatory practice” (GE Health, 2019). A GE Healthcare EMR System, Centricity EMR could therefore be considered an integrated EHR/EMR system that could be used by healthcare institutions

Healthcare Organization Banner Healthcare is an American non-profit healthcare system predominantly used in Phoenix, Arizona. The healthcare organization runs twenty-three hospitals plus various other specialized units. It has about 35,000 workers in its employment and so is one of the state's biggest employers. It offers emergency care, hospital care, rehab services, outpatient surgery, pharmacies, hospice, home care and long-term care. The organization has recently begun running primary care physician clinics such