Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Newspapers and magazines, if they picked up the story, could spread a large amount of information very rapidly, and whether this information was accurate or not it would still cause problems for the drug company that marketed the particular drug (Hilgartner & Bosk, 1988).
The media, however, is not the only problem where panic resulting from a drug is concerned. Attorneys could also add to the concern by advertising for lawsuits regarding a specific drug. Some of this is already seen with Paxil and other antidepressants, but even a new drug could easily be the object of paranoia if enough attorneys felt that class actions lawsuits were necessary to get the attention of individuals within the medical community. This much of an uproar would also get the attention of the media which would then become involved through the aforementioned news programs and other venues.
If one wanted to generate public fear for a new drug, one would first have to show that there was danger - either real or imagined - in that particular medication (Reinarman & Levine, 1989). Once this was done, the story and/or the information would have to be disseminated to many different media outlets and any other individuals or companies that would work to spread the word without stopping to effectively determine whether the information was completely and technically accurate or whether it was only created by someone that wanted to worry and concern others. This information would also have to be spread very thoroughly and very quickly simply because it could therefore spread very far before anyone proved it untrue if it actually was untrue (Levine & Reinarman, 1988). Without this, a story like that would die out rapidly and nothing would come of it except for a few upset people and one or two days of concern (Goode, 1990).
Previous panic episodes about prescription and non-prescription medications have generally been short-lived in this country, but there have been a few times where the public has been worried and concerned regarding a specific drug (Goode, 1990). Generally, the media and the drug companies have done a good job of making individuals feel as ease, however, and the panic has quickly subsided. Done properly, however, the panic over a prescription or non-prescription drug that is dangerous or potentially dangerous could spiral up very quickly and not subside as easily as it has in the past. It would have to be a drug, however, that many, many people are taking, or there would be no real point in attempting to generate a panic because there would not be enough people taking the drug to frighten a large portion of the population (Goode, 1990).
The drug, if it were a prescription drug, would have to be a medication that is taken for one of the most common and well-known ailments, such as heart disease or diabetes. If the drug was a non-prescription drug then it would have to be a pain reliever or a cold remedy most likely - something so very common that millions of people would be taking it for problems that they or their doctor diagnosed them with. In sum, drug panic in this country could be quite easily accomplished, but the media would have to be the largest help when it came to who was going to spread the word and frighten the people. There is no other realistic way to alarm that many people that quickly without the help of the media and the 'horror stories' that seem so popular on the nightly news.
Goode, Erich. (19900. "The American drug panic of the 1980s: social construction or objective threat?" The International 3 rournal of the Addictions, 25(9): 1083-98
Haines, Herbert H. (1979). "Cognitive claims-making, enclosure, and the depoliticization of social problems." The Sociological Quarterly, 20 (Winter): 119-30
Hilgartner, Stephen, & Bosk, Charles L. (1988). "The rise and fall of social problems: a public arenas model." American Journal of Sociology, 94 (July): 53-78
Levine, Harry G. & Reinarman, Craig. (1988). "The politics of America's latest drug scare." In R. Curry (ed.), Freedom at Risk: Secrecy, Censorship, and Repression in the 1980s. Philadelphia. Temple University Press, pp. 251-8
Reinarman, Craig, & Levine, Harry G. (1989). "The crack attack: politics and media in America's latest drug scare." In Joel…[continue]
"Drug Panic It Used To" (2006, December 13) Retrieved October 22, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/drug-panic-it-used-to-40950
"Drug Panic It Used To" 13 December 2006. Web.22 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/drug-panic-it-used-to-40950>
"Drug Panic It Used To", 13 December 2006, Accessed.22 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/drug-panic-it-used-to-40950
In their efforts to put an end to the presence of drugs on U.S. territory, authorities have implemented tougher drug laws. "Congressman Barr has described the "War on Drugs" as a war for the very lives of our children." (Williams, Juan 2001) Even if there have been divergences in the past between the American government and drug abusers, it has not been until the 1970s that the actual war against drugs
Drug Use and Abuse Drug abuse Caetano (1997, 58) in his studies describe drug abuse as the poor pattern of substance or drug consumption that results to harm on one's health and when you think about the word drugs, what comes to mind? It's in our human nature to instantly think about someone using crack or codeine. So therefore; we just stereo-typed someone we knew nothing about, it's what makes us humans.
Substance use is frequently associated with child abuse and domestic violence. It also is a leading contributor to marital dissatisfaction, family breakups and rejection of family members. The importance of the family in understanding alcohol and drug use and abuse is underlined by these highly destructive consequences of alcohol and drug dependency on the abuser and the family. (Lala; Straussner; Fewell, 17) Peer Group plays an important part in resolving
The authors state, "underlying mechanism through which exposure to childhood abuse is associated with increased risk of panic cannot be determined based on these data alone" (p. 888). They offer several possible explanations. Exposure to abuse as a child may result in an extreme and realistic fear of threat to survival. This may be how panic disorder starts. Later, it may persist, or recur spontaneously, even without abusive conditions.
Drug Profile Drug addiction is a human issue that cultivates biological, psychological, and social consequences, among others. The manifestation of addiction itself is characterized by physical dependence, and is defined by the uncontrollable, compulsive urge to seek and use drugs despite harmful repercussions (Fernandez, Rodriguez & Villa, 2011). Philologically, drug use affects the reward center, where dopamine receptors are over-stimulated. Ultimately, the repetition of drug use is encouraged to achieve the
Panic Attacks How to Deal with Panic Attacks: a Process Essay Panic attacks can happen to almost anyone but especially to those who have difficulty dealing with stressful situations. When a panic attack first hits, it can be confused for a nervous breakdown or even a heart attack. It can stifle one's breath, cause trembling, fear, chest pain, the sensation of being trapped, nausea, and tunnel vision. There are many theories on
Apparent health can be generally positive or negative; in spite of how it links with the real health; it may be significant to comprehend its function in certain kinds of psychopathology. Negatively apparent health has been anticipated to symbolize a cognitive risk factor for panic disorder (PD), detached from elevated anxiety feeling. As a result, PD may be more likely to take place on a background of negative perceptions