Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Educational Philosophy Comparison: John Dewey vs. William Bagley
There have always been philosophical battles between progressive thinkers and conservative thinkers when it comes to the education of America's children. Those wars were waged in the 18th, 19th, and 20th Centuries, and educators from both sides, and some in the middle or the far left or far right, are still involved in the same philosophical scrimmages today. It's healthy though, to look back at two of the brightest minds in the development of the American educational structure, the classic progressive John Dewey, and the quintessential conservative William Chandler Bagley, and examine what they had to say. Many of their debating points are as poignant and pertinent today as back then.
Introduction to educators John Dewey and William Bagley
John Dewey was born in Burlington Vermont, graduated from the University of Vermont and received his Ph.D. At Johns Hopkins in 1884. He taught at the universities of Minnesota, Michigan, and Chicago, and at Columbia, until he retired in 1930. Along the way, he developed a theory of "instrumentalism" which holds that the various forms of activity by humans are instruments developed by man to help find solutions for his various problems; and in fact, since the problems are always changing, Dewey felt that the instruments for dealing with those problems also need to change. In education, where he made the biggest impact, he advocated "progressive" education, which calls for turning away from authoritarian styles of teaching and rather, children learning through experimentation, and through helping young people learn to think. He also believed education to be a tool for empowering citizens to integrate culture and careers into the classroom experience. Some of Dewey's books touched on psychology, ethics, philosophy, and social change (Ethics; Human Nature and Conduct; Experience and Nature; Liberalism and Social Action; Problems of Men). Among his better known books on education are: Democracy and Education, and Experience and Education; the latter is primary source for this paper.
William Chandler Bagley was born in Detroit, received a Bachelor of Arts degree at Michigan State College, a Master's at the University of Wisconsin, and a Ph.D. At Cornell University, in 1900. After teaching in elementary schools, he became professor of education at a teachers college in Columbia, until 1940. He became a vigorous opponent of "pragmatism and progressive education, asserting that the value of knowledge is very great on its own merits, not just as an instrument to accomplish something with. He was critical of other teachers and educators for failing to emphasize what he believed to be important - a systematic study of academic subject matter. He wrote books (Education and Emergent Man; The Educative Process; Educational Values; and Determinism in Education, among others), and served as editor in chief of the Journal of the National Education Association and School and Society.
Introduction to John Dewey's Progressive Educational Theories
John Dewey is known in many circles as the "Father of public education," but more specifically, Dewey was a progressive thinker who, many believe, was way ahead of his time. He saw a need to teach students to think, rather than merely memorizing material and reciting it appropriately during examination. In his book, Experience and Education, Dewey refers to the "traditional education" as simply bodies of information and skills that "have been worked out in the past" - that just need to be "transmitted to the next generation." One prepares "the young for future responsibilities and for success in life..." By acquiring the organized bodies of information" which "comprehend the material of instruction." More simply put, Dewey says teachers, under traditional education, "are the agents through which knowledge and skills are communicated and rules of conduct enforced." He describes "progressive education," however, as a "criticism" of traditional schooling. It embraces "expression and cultivation of individuality" rather than "imposition from above"; and "free activity" as opposed to "external discipline"; and "learning through experience" rather than just from books and teachers. Progressive education - according to Dewey - also includes the "acquisition of skills as a means of attaining ends which make direct vital appeal" rather than the drumming into students' heads of skills by drill; and it means not preparing students for "a more or less remote future" - but rather, helping them make the most of the "opportunities of present life." Finally, Dewey's progressive education approach, he said, prepares a student for "a changing world" as opposed to "static aims and materials." Dewey says a progressive education is better…[continue]
"Educational Philosophy Comparison John Dewey Vs William" (2003, September 26) Retrieved December 6, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/educational-philosophy-comparison-john-154621
"Educational Philosophy Comparison John Dewey Vs William" 26 September 2003. Web.6 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/educational-philosophy-comparison-john-154621>
"Educational Philosophy Comparison John Dewey Vs William", 26 September 2003, Accessed.6 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/educational-philosophy-comparison-john-154621
Synthesize traditional and progressive education for today's students. Education digest. Vol. 68, Issue 7, 4-8. Retrieved January 17, 2011, from: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?hid=12&sid=90682ec6-64e1-4958-adc2-32dc1555fcc4%40sessionmgr13&vid=4&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=aph&an=9317873 Cohen, L.M. & Gelbrich, J. (1999). Philosophical perspectives in education. Oregon State University, School of Education. Retrieved January 17, 2011, from: http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/ed416/PP2.html Moser, R.D. (1951, July). The educational philopophy of William T. Harris. Peabody Journal of education. Vol. 29, No. 1, 14-33 Retrieved January 17, 2011, from http://www. Jstor, org/stable/1489104 Nehring,
According to Bales, 1999, the concept behind SYMLOG is that "every act of behavior takes place in a larger context, that it is a part of an interactive field of influences." Further, "the approach assumes that one needs to understand the larger context -- person, interpersonal, group, and external situation -- in order to understand the patterns of behavior and to influence them successfully." With SYMLOG, measurement procedures are
Studies here included in this set are evaluations of large multisite and single site after school programs; evaluations of school- and community-based models; evaluations assessing a narrow to a broad range of outcomes; key developmental research studies; and key meta-analyses and research syntheses (Little, Wimer, and Weiss, 2007, 3). In Music for Citizenship, David J. Elliott, he elaborates upon the vision of Paul Woodford in Democracy and Music Education who
Decisions by School Superintendents Improper Attitude and Unprofessional Conduct of Teachers To educate a person in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society - President Theodore Roosevelt. That teaching is at one and the same time an intellectual as well as a moral endeavor, is an idea that is well entrenched in the minds of men since centuries past. The sayings of great teachers of ancient times bear
growing recognition of the changing educational needs of college students, particularly those attending community colleges. In response to this awareness, reform efforts have been implemented in order to meet the needs of students. As reform efforts have been considered, increasing attention has been directed toward assessing the influence of learning styles on academic performance. The term 'learning styles' has been used to refer to the ways in which individuals