Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
NAFTA and its affects on the Mexican foreign trade. The writer explores what NAFTA is and how it operates then outlines the way it impacts the Mexican foreign trade. There were six sources used to complete this paper.
NAFTA's Impact on Foreign Trade with Mexico
The North American Free Trade Agreement was put together in 1993 and provides agreed upon resolutions for its members when it comes to free trade boundaries and rules. The NAFTA allows its members to regulate things such as tariffs, import and export regulations and other issues that come up in the course of trade business between the nations. NAFTA had a positive impact on Mexico's free trade industry because it strengthened an already strong relationship between the United States and Mexico.
Several years before the NAFTA agreement went into place Mexico began working on its economic reforms to improve its trade business both locally and world wide.
Before the NAFTA was implemented Mexico joined another trade organization called the World Trade Organization WTO. It provided general agreements about tariff and trade among its members and encouraged business among its members (MEXICO AND THE FREE TRADE AREA OF THE AMERICAS Mexico http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/ites/1002/ijee/ftaa-derbez.htm)
Mexico also joined several other organizations as well. It joined in NAFTA with the U.S. And Canada in 1994 and it was a move that had a positive impact on the free trade of Mexico. Today Mexico is considered the seventh leading nation of trade in the entire world and it is the number one nation in Latin America.
In 2001, despite the global economic slowdown and the terrorist attacks of September 11, Mexico's foreign trade surpassed $326 billion. The nearly $159 billion in exports registered last year more than tripled the amount that were exported in 1993(MEXICO AND THE FREE TRADE AREA OF THE AMERICAS Mexico http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/ites/1002/ijee/ftaa-derbez.htm)."
When NAFTA went into place and included Mexico and Canada as well as the U.S., it essentially removed most of the previous restrictions regarding several things including the flow of business. Whether it was services, investments, or goods with loosened restrictions it became a positive experience for Mexico (Rokenbach PG). It has been considered by some experts as a major turning point in the process of integrating the trade relations between United States and Mexico (MEXICO AND THE FREE TRADE AREA OF THE AMERICAS Mexico http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/ites/1002/ijee/ftaa-derbez.htm).
Because Mexico and the United States have the largest mutual trade relationship in the world the economic success of those in NAFTA becomes very important. Research and history points to a continued strengthening of the relationship shared because of NAFTA not only between Mexico and the U.S. But Mexico and Canada as well. It is obviously helpful for the U.S. And Mexico to trade through NAFTA because of their close boundaries but the Canadian-Mexico trade business is stronger than it has ever been according to the numbers and the NAFTA created the stage for that to happen. The trade with Canada and Mexico has increased more than eight billion over the last eight years. Mexico has moved to the position of number one supplier of import goods for Canada since the implementation of NAFTA (MEXICO AND THE FREE TRADE AREA OF THE AMERICAS Mexico http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/ites/1002/ijee/ftaa-derbez.htm).
Through NAFTA, Mexico has consolidated its position as the second-largest trading partner of the United States. In 2001, bilateral trade exceeded $245 billion -- an increase of nearly 188% since 1993. On average, the United States and Mexico trade more than $1.7 billion every day. The United States' trade with Mexico has grown faster than with any other major U.S. trading partner, including China, Germany, Korea, and the United Kingdom. Mexican exports to the United States have grown twice as fast as those from the rest of the world. As a result, Mexico has increased its share of total U.S. imports from 6.8% in 1993 to 12% in May 2002(MEXICO AND THE FREE TRADE AREA OF THE AMERICAS Mexico http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/ites/1002/ijee/ftaa-derbez.htm)."
There are several other reasons that NAFTA has had a positive impact on the free trade business of Mexico as well. One of the most important things that NAFTA did for Mexico's free trade business was open the need for increased manufacturing. Because there was an agreement and through that agreement there have been constant increases in trade needs between Mexico and the other members it has meant an increased need…[continue]
"Effects Of NAFTA On Mexican Foreign Trade" (2003, April 30) Retrieved October 21, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/effects-of-nafta-on-mexican-foreign-trade-148131
"Effects Of NAFTA On Mexican Foreign Trade" 30 April 2003. Web.21 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/effects-of-nafta-on-mexican-foreign-trade-148131>
"Effects Of NAFTA On Mexican Foreign Trade", 30 April 2003, Accessed.21 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/effects-of-nafta-on-mexican-foreign-trade-148131
NAFTA Clinton, Congress, the Constitution and NAFTA As Thomas E. Woods, Jr. (2004) asserts, the Clinton Administration did much to expand the role of government in the lives of ordinary citizens. Woods alludes to the Clinton Administration's policies as "damaging and counterproductive expansions of government power, particularly in agricultural, housing, and environmental policy" (p. 239). Just looking in the realm of agribusiness, the expansion of government power and corporate monopoly is seen
Bibliography Balance of trade. Retrieved from Web site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balance_of_trade Buchanan, P.J. (2005, July 27). CAFTA: Ideology vs. national interests.The American Cause. Retrieved from Web site: http://www.theamericancause.org/a-pjb-050727-cafta.htm Buchanan, P.J. (2006, March 10). The fruits of NAFTA.WorldNetDaily. Retrieved from Web site: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49201 Buchanan. P.J. (2007, February 27). Free trade and funny math. Retrieved from Web site: http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/23116.html CAFTA, trade deficits and jobs. Business Coalition for U.S.-Central America Trade. Retrieved from Web site: http://www.uscafta.org/policy/view.asp?POLICY_ID=136 Henriques, G. And Patel, R.
Faux finds that this promise has not been fulfilled, in part because of what NAFTA does not do: NAFTA provided no social contract. It offered neither aid for Mexico nor labor, health or environmental standards. The agreement protected corporate investors; everyone else was on his or her own. (Faux 35) For Mexico in particular, says Faux, NAFTA has been a failure, and the economy still depends too heavily on the remittances
NAFTA and the American Trucking Companies The North American Free Trade Agreement is a trade agreement signed in November 1993 between the United States, Canada, and Mexico (NAFTA pp). NAFTA promoters, which include many of the world's largest corporations, promised it would create hundreds of thousands of new high-wage U.S. jobs, raise living standards, improve environmental conditions and transform Mexico into a booming new market for U.S. exports (North pp). Opponents
S. attributed to NAFTA. Figure 1: Rise in the Business Investment (adapted from "NAFTA -- Myth…," ¶ 1). Myth #2: NAFTA has cost the U.S. jobs. Fact: U.S. employment rose from 110.8 million people in 1993 to 137.6 million in 2007, an increase of 24%. The average unemployment rate was 5.1% in the period 1994-2007, compared to 7.1% during the period 1980-1993. ("NAFTA -- Myth…," ¶ 2) Figure 2 reflects U.S. Employment Increases
NAFTA vs. The EU NAFTA History and formation of the trade bloc The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), a free trade agreement uniting Canada, Mexico, and the United States, was signed in January 1994 by Democratic President Bill Clinton. The intention of the agreement was to eliminate most of the tariffs on products traded between these three nations. The tariffs were phased out gradually, and the full agreement was not realized until
"While wages south of the border were lower than within the United States, lower productivity and higher costs for critical elements such as power and water made Mexico less viable than many originally thought" (Sinclair, 2004). But even so, the factories continued to operate, causing job loses for the American workers. It is rather difficult to give a clear number of the jobs created, according to NAFTA advocates, or