Engineering Ethics -- Case Study: Term Paper

If Liz is supportive of the CDC plan, she has a greater duty to disclose her situation to the Committee. If Liz cannot make a full-faith effort on behalf of the Committee because of her concerns about her employment, she must disclose her concerns to the Committee. Likewise, if Liz cannot fulfill her work responsibilities because of her personal beliefs and association with the Committee, Liz has an obligation to notify CDC so that they can appoint someone without any such conflicts to perform the role for which Liz would have been responsible. Liz may not remain silent and simply shirk (or fake) her performance in the CDC effort. Liz has every right to oppose the CDC project in her personal time although from a practical matter, it may cost her the job. The safest alternative course of action for Liz might have been to simply respond truthfully that she is well acquainted with the city council because she had previously been very active in opposing commercial projects in her home area. She...

...

Had he been aware that Liz had any authority or influence over the city council and meant for her to misuse that authority or influence on behalf of CDC, then David would have not been acting ethically. Finally, Jim did not act ethically when he instructed David to make sure that Liz "cools it on this one" because Jim and CDC have no authority over Liz's private conduct outside of the workplace.

Cite this Document:

"Engineering Ethics -- Case Study " (2010, April 18) Retrieved May 8, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/engineering-ethics-case-study-12929

"Engineering Ethics -- Case Study " 18 April 2010. Web.8 May. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/engineering-ethics-case-study-12929>

"Engineering Ethics -- Case Study ", 18 April 2010, Accessed.8 May. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/engineering-ethics-case-study-12929

Related Documents

Engineering Curriculum Content Engineering curriculum Acquiring Engineering education is essential in training good quality engineer who afterwards becomes equipped to take up challenging task and responsibility as they undertake their duty. As one who is bestowed with responsibilities of administering an institution with limited resources and assigned to take part in revising the engineering curriculum that can accommodate more number of graduates, it is important to have necessary curriculum contents. As time passed

Engineering Ethics
PAGES 7 WORDS 2105

Engineering Ethics Ethics and Morality Related to the Field of Engineering The purpose of this paper is to define engineering ethics in brief, here the discussion will also be about why successful engineers should be able to inspire trust and confidence in others where their integrity and honesty is concerned. Some references will also be given regarding why college students have to be loyal before they step into the practical world. All

2009). This gives a strong idea of where the ethical onus lies in the practice of engineering. Another rather more expansive case study can be derived form the current state of bridges in the United States, and the general state of disrepair of many bridges that are still n regular heavy use (Harris et al. 2009). A rating system has been developed that determines when a bridge should be put

When you begin a career, you may not be sure what skills you are lacking, so working part-time, taking an internship, or even volunteering could help prepare the student for what the job entails, and make them more comfortable as they begin their career. As the career develops, the engineer may begin to see skills that are lacking, such as English writing, or team building, or many other aspects of

S. standards on foreign companies. Cascio, W.F. "Decency Means More than 'Always Low Prices': A Comparison of Costco to Wal-Mart's Sam's Club." Academy of Management Perspectives (August 2006). Accessed 18 June 2012 from: http://www.ou.edu/russell/UGcomp/Cascio.pdf This source is an article that appeared in the professional Journal, Academy of Management Perspectives. It provides a comparison of Wal-Mart and Costco from the perspective of their respective ethical approaches to various issues. Generally, the author contrasts the manner

Engineering Ethics This post-mortem report is directed to the British Petroleum (BP) board of directors concerning the BP Texas City refinery explosion incident that took place on March 23, 2005. A series of explosions occurred during the restarting of the hydrocarbon isomerization unit in the Texas City refinery. The main technical reason behind the initial explosion was the flooding of the over-pressurized distillation column, which ended up in a geyser of