Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Consequently, the underlying concept regarding the two different arguments is the actual point for the beginning of life. Through the application of several ethical theories, stem cell research is unethical because of the following reasons:
Respect to All Persons:
Based on the utilitarian ethical theory or principle, stem cell research is unethical because it violates the need to respect all individuals and provide the greatest happiness to many people. The emergence of a fetus means that it should be considered as a fully-fledged person who deserves to be treated with respect and dignity. Through this respect and dignity, we will guarantee and provide the greatest happiness to the fetus or fully-pledged person who deserves access to the right to life.
Therefore, by destroying the fetus, stem cell research does not promote the need to provide the greatest happiness to many people. Actually, this practice is unethical because it does not increase the amount of pleasure that the fetus experience but rather increases its amount of pain. It's also unethical because it results in the treatment of individuals unfairly unlike the fair treatment stated in the Utilitarianism ethical principle.
Numerous Disadvantages:
Before any research is conducted or undertaken, there is a great need to examine the potential net social benefit of that research. This need goes beyond doing no harm to the need to achieve some...
Stem cell research is unethical based on Kant's approach that requires selfish interests to be disregarded in favor of rules that are equally reasonable to all moral agents. The research is unethical because the potential benefits of the practice are not only overstated but they are also less than the actual and potential social harms.
As a result of these numerous disadvantages or social harms, stem cell research is a practice that is not based on rules that are equally reasonable for all moral agents to embrace. Moreover, since the practice is not generally reasonable and acceptable among all members of the society, it's unethical. This is largely because if the research is undertaken, various important opinions that have been raised against it by various groups including religious organization and pro-life activists would be neglected and promote disrespect to cultural or religious beliefs.
Conclusion:
As the world continues to experience several dramatic advances across various fields, there are various ethical dimensions that continue to emerge. The emerging dimensions, concerns, and questions can be addressed through ethical approaches and principles. While ethical theories don't provide ready-made solutions, they help in decision-making processes.
Reference:
Wolff, R.P. (2012). Ethical Theory. In About philosophy. Pearson Education, Inc.
Reference:
Wolff, R.P. (2012). Ethical Theory. In About philosophy. Pearson Education, Inc.
Ethical Theory or System Other names for theory Real World example Workplace example Consequence-based ethics This approach prioritizes the value attached to results of actions. Consequence based approach points at the results of one's action on the others and the fact that other people tend to play a leading role in ethical decision-making. One needs to evaluate the potential positive and negative effect of the available options in a situation and use the evaluation as a
Ethical Theories The three basic ethical theories share a number of similarities, because they each attempt to describe and explicate the ethical decisions made by humans as well as the logic (or illogic) that is used to inform any particular behavior. Utilitarianism offers what is perhaps the most sound ethical theory due to the way it chooses for itself the goal of its efforts, but it is hampered by disagreement regarding
Ethical Theory Despite the fact that codes of conduct and belief systems permeate everyone's life on an everyday basis, developing a universally acceptable concept of ethics or moral philosophy remains a seemingly impossible task that has plagued philosophers and the world's great thinkers since the beginning of time. Over time a great number of different philosophical theories have arise. Each one has its strengths and weaknesses and each has enjoyed its
Ethical Theories Describe in detail Teleological, deontological, and virtue ethics: A comparison Teleological ethics are also called consequence-based ethics. Teleological ethical systems emphasize the results of ethical decisions, versus the moral principles behind such decisions. Utilitarianism is an excellent example of teleological ethics. The stress in utilitarianism is doing the greatest good for the greatest number of people, versus setting a precedent for all ethical actions. "It denies that moral rightness depends directly
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice developed as a cohesive field in the late twentieth century, with the establishment of the Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Journal, in 1998. The theory therefore represents a culmination of scholarly thought and analysis in the fields of philosophy, sociology, and psychology. As a cross-disciplinary theory, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice reveals the increasing hybridization of fields that relate to normative ethics. Because Ethical Theory and
Utilitarianism is most often used by healthcare organizations like insurance companies: to keep costs down for the many, a potentially valuable treatment may be denied to the individual because it is deemed experimental or unnecessarily costly. As unpalatable as the idea may be, no patient can be tested for every single conceivable illness he or she might contract. There must be some prioritization of high-risk groups. During his or