Ethics In Vitro Fertilization IVF: Essay

Sherwin starts her look at IVF from a feminist perspective by stating that capitalism, racism, sexism and elitism of the culture today have united to generate a set of outlooks which sees kids as property. Children are valued as privatized commodities, reflecting the virility and heredity of their parents. The argument goes on to say that women are convinced that their most significant purpose in life is to bear and raise children. They are told repetitively that their life is deficient and that they are missing fulfillment if they do not have kids.

According to Sherwin feminist theory helps one of focus on different dimensions of the problem. But with the issue of IVF, it is still difficult to decide whether to encourage, tolerate, modify or restrict reproductive technology. The author states that in her opinion feminist theory is a moral theory that centers on relations among people as well as on individuals. It has as a model an inter-related social fabric that gives primary bonds amid people rather than rights to independence. Because it is a theory that is overtly aware of the social, political and economic associations that exist amid people, it concentrates on the implications of actions or policies on the position of women. This the author feels that it is necessary to ask questions from the perspective of feminist ethics in addition to those whoa re normally asked from the perspective of mainstream ethical theories.

The author admits that feminist ethics will not support a wholly negative outlook towards IVF, for the reason that it does not address the obligation to care for those...

...

It is the responsibility of those who oppose further implementation of this technology to work toward the changes in the social arrangements that will lead to a reduction of the sense of need for this type of solution.
Sherwin discusses what feminist theory and how it relates to IVF in regards to ethical concerns. She concludes that the advantage of looking at IVF from a feminist perspective is that a feminist analysis explicitly accepts the need for a political component to the understanding of ethical issues. From the point-of-view of feminist ethics, the primary question that has to be looked at is whether IVF and other forms of reproductive technology threaten to reinforce the lack of autonomy which women now have in the present culture.

The author goes on to state that ethics ought not to be evaluated on individual case without also looking at the implications of decisions from a wide perspective. Sherwin feels that a theory of feminist ethics provides that wider perspective, for its different methodology is sensitive to both the personal and social dimensions that surround this issue.

Works Cited

Sherwin, Susan. Feminist Ethics and In Vitro Fertilization. Biomedical Ethics. By Degrazia,

David, Mappes, Thomas A. And Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. 2010. 7th ed. Columbus:

McGraw-Hill. 2010. 548-552. Print.

Singer, Peter. IVF: The Simple Case. Biomedical Ethics. By Degrazia, David, Mappes,

Thomas A. And Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. 2010. 7th ed. Columbus: McGraw-Hill. 2010.

544-548. Print.

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Sherwin, Susan. Feminist Ethics and In Vitro Fertilization. Biomedical Ethics. By Degrazia,

David, Mappes, Thomas A. And Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. 2010. 7th ed. Columbus:

McGraw-Hill. 2010. 548-552. Print.

Singer, Peter. IVF: The Simple Case. Biomedical Ethics. By Degrazia, David, Mappes,


Cite this Document:

"Ethics In Vitro Fertilization IVF " (2011, June 29) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ethics-in-vitro-fertilization-ivf-42836

"Ethics In Vitro Fertilization IVF " 29 June 2011. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ethics-in-vitro-fertilization-ivf-42836>

"Ethics In Vitro Fertilization IVF ", 29 June 2011, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ethics-in-vitro-fertilization-ivf-42836

Related Documents

This may be done without the consent of the owner of the information thus also infringing on their right to privacy. Education has also been revolutionized greatly by technology. As a result of technological advancements it is now possible for teachers and students to communicate over thousands of miles. Instructors are also able to give assignments which students can submit despite the distance. In this way, technology has enabled global

Ethics of Human Cloning Two Major Types of Cloning In the 1980 epoch, numerous scientists initiated researching formulas of cloning the high order animals, particularly mammals (Kass 2002, p. 7). The heightening success of their research and experiments has resulted into pervasive discussion over the probability of human cloning. This discussion has elicited extensive disagreements within the scientific society and the entire public over whether the research of human cloning is right.

Women over 38 face both greater risk of chromosomal abnormalities and they have higher pregnancy risk in general, so they are the most likely candidate group for PGD testing (Sherbahn, 2013). There are some drawbacks to PGD as well that need to be taken into consideration. While a common argument against the technique relates to moral hazard, that hazard originates from subsequent decisions and is not directly related to the

Although these stem cells are only a few years old, they possess unlimited potential in terms of clinical research. Specifically, scientists are focusing their potential uses in transplant medicine in order to significantly reduce the level of both infections and overall organ rejection in organ transplant surgery. The potential for using stem cells is of vast clinical and medical importance. These cells could potentially allow scientists to learn what occurs

Ethics of Human Cloning Genetic engineering and cloning have played important roles in agriculture for many generations. Bananas and seedless grapes, for example, are, quite literally, living genetic clones (Krock, 2001). Prior to the last decade of the 20th Century, human cloning was purely a subject of science fiction, but by the dawn of the 21st Century, researchers had already cloned several mammals successfully. In 1978, medical science had progressed to the

The report suggested that the planned ban on human cloning should be evaluated inside of five years, but that it ought to be reassessed only if a fresh technical appraisal indicates that the actions are probable to be secure and successful, and if an extensive nationwide conversation on community, spiritual and ethical issues proposes that re-examination is necessary. The panel deemed that the technical and medical contemplations that rationalize