Evil Is Divided Into Two Book Review

PAGES
3
WORDS
924
Cite

4. How does Luther and Calvin's view of moral evil differ from that of Catholicism?

The classical Christian approach to the dilemma of moral evil has been that people are abusing the freedom of choice given to them by their creator. With free will and the ability to choose between good and evil actions, people who exercise the wrong choices can create moral evil, which impacts others. The Catholic Church essentially takes this approach to evil. To understand their approach, one must understand the concept of original sin. When Adam and Eve were in the garden, they were created in the image of God, but with a presumably much more limited intellect than modern humans. They were forbidden to eat the fruit of the tree of knowledge, because it would give them moral reasoning, thus making them closer to God. However, they chose to eat of this fruit, which distanced them from the image of their creator. While doing so gave humans greater intellect, it was also their first act of disobedience against God and humans continue to pay for this original sin through the specter of moral evil. Luther and Calvin's view of moral evil is heavily linked to the idea of predestination. While Calvin believed that damnation could be preordained, Luther did not. However, both believe in the idea of a creator God who determined the actions and events of the universe for eternity when establishing the universe....

...

Therefore, the idea of moral evil is less linked to the notion of original sin and moral choices, than it is to simply God's will. In this way, they almost approach moral evil as others approach natural evil.
5. Explain new approaches to the understanding of moral evil.

There are several different new approaches to the understanding of moral evil. Many of these are based in soft-science approaches, such as sociology or psychology. They posit that evil is a learned behavior, and, therefore, since society is full of evil, people learn and act in evil ways. Moreover, because societies have established institutions, which reinforce evil, even good people in society will have a difficult time eliminating moral evil. In addition, some contemporary approaches still embrace the concept of original sin. Because original sin pervades humanity, and the human condition requires interaction between people, evil will never cease to exist. However, evil is not viewed as the consequence of failure to obey God, as it has traditionally been viewed from the context of an original-sin perspective. This new view of original sin has been greatly shaped by social movements like feminism.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Hill, B., Knitter, P., & Madges, W. (1997). Faith, religion & theology: A contemporary introduction revised & expanded. Mystic, CT: Twenty-Third Publications.


Cite this Document:

"Evil Is Divided Into Two" (2010, November 01) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/evil-is-divided-into-two-11964

"Evil Is Divided Into Two" 01 November 2010. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/evil-is-divided-into-two-11964>

"Evil Is Divided Into Two", 01 November 2010, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/evil-is-divided-into-two-11964

Related Documents

Origin of Evil The origin of evil has been a controversial issue not only in the contemporary Christian circles but also among the ancient Greek Christians. The point of contention in the discussion about the origin of evil is why a good God would have created evil. The Judeo-Christians struggled to understand how a good, powerful, and all-knowing God could allow evil to exist. The logical conclusions were that either God

Two Societies at War
PAGES 2 WORDS 644

United States was founded upon conflict. As early as the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia the lines of contention were already drawn: the commercial interests of the North conflicted with the planter interests of the South. When the Constitutional Convention convened the founders of the United States sought to put into writing the philosophical basis for the nation they had recently created -- and slavery was an issue.

This final dinner scene and the ensuing bloodbath wrings ever last possible ounce of gory drama out of the script; the talking ceases for a time while the camera observes the members of the dinner party all enjoying the pies that contain the blood and bones (and possibly the meat, although this isn't made explicit in either the script or the film) of Tamora's two sons. This makes the

.. The superior man is broad and fair; the inferior man takes sides and is petty... A superior man shapes the good in man; he does not shape the bad in him. It is said that a disciple once asked Confucius to define the conduct of one's entire life with a single word. The Chinese philosopher replied: "Is not reciprocity such a word? What you do not want done to yourself

Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens and Reflections on the Revolution in France, by Edmund Burke. Specifically it will compare the two novels, answering the question: "Given that our two authors are English, what do Reflections on the Revolution in France and A Tale of Two Cities tell you about English attitudes towards revolution in general and the French Revolution in particular?" Both of these countries were in

Plato's Republic, Book 2
PAGES 3 WORDS 870

Plato's Republic In ancient Greece, there were a number of ideas that were considered to be some of the most desirable attributes in society. In Plato's Republic these ideas are taken in different directions with a critical inward look at humanity and what characteristics need to be embraced. One of the better areas where this is discussed is through Glaucon's arguments about justice. To fully understand these ideas requires explaining