Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Faith as a Basis of Knowledge in Religion and Natural Science
The relationship between faith / religion and science has through history stirred a debate that has taken on philosophical, scientific and theological aspects. Are the two compatible? Are they at totally opposite ends of the spectrum of life and the universe? This paper analyses the strengths and weaknesses of faith as a basis of knowledge in religion and natural science.
The Literature on Faith as a Basis of Knowledge in Religion and Science
The Harvard University publication The Friend (circa, 1871) posed some pertinent issues for readers regarding faith and science, issues that are just as relevant today as they were 141 years ago. For example, author William Evans, a minister with the Society of Friends (Quakers), explains that in the 1870s scientists were questioning the value of religious belief, and "…aiming to modify the theology and character" of the Christian church (Evans, 1870, p. 95). These questions "awakened…a tone of doubt and disbelief" that has produced "wide-spread unsettlement and uneasiness respecting religious belief," Evans writes. This resulted in a "…feverish spasm running through" Christian denominations, and causing church members to "break loose" from their faith (Evans, 95).
One kind of faith is based on "the reception of a truth demonstrated…by the correct reasoning of another" (i.e., science); a second faith is "…exercised in relation to spiritual and divine things… which…are beyond the sphere of the elements which the powers of reason are able to investigate" (Evans, 95). Hence the second faith must be based on the "accepted infallibility of the source producing it," which in Christianity, is the Word of God. This could be considered a weakness of faith, since knowledge is based on supernatural truths.
In the Methodist Quarterly Review (MQR) (1875) the author explained that science and faith are "…arrayed against each other…and are feeling for each other's throats." Science on the one hand "…demands that belief shall accept nothing but positive knowledge as a foundation upon which reason may build its structure." Religion, "…on the contrary, is based neither upon self-evident truth nor demonstration," the MQR states. Indeed, religion...
Taking the argument a step further, Descartes believed that all a scientist -- and a faith-based person -- can know "…is the testimony of his consciousness." Consciousness "never deceives" (Descartes) and if one assumes God exists, then God would want him to "trust his consciousness" because God would not "…allow him to be thus deceived in the holy of holies of his being" (e.g., his consciousness) (MQR, 29). The concept of consciousness strengthens the argument for faith.
Joseph John Murphy has written (in 1873) a concise rationale for bringing together faith and natural science. His book, The Scientific Bases of Faith provides insights and questions that these years later still have relevance. What Murphy wanted to convey is his hope that science will "finally accept religion as not indeed the basis, but the summit and crown" (of science) (Murphy, 1873, p. 4). "Science is the basis of religion," Murphy explains (6), because "supernatural truths imply natural ones, and cannot be stated without presupposing them."
Man discovers the facts and truth about science "for himself," Murphy explains; but "those of religion are revealed" to him (6). Still, this contrast should not suggest that there would be antagonism between the two disciplines, Murphy continues. And thus since the physical sciences are to a great degree "based on the mathematical" and hence, the mutual relation of science and religion "ought to be just the same" (6). In fact, Murphy asserts, the "antagonism between science and religion…is purely imaginary" although the antagonism between those who study and teach science and those who study and teach religion "is, unfortunately, sometimes real" though that will disappear in time, he concludes. Attitudes like those of Murphy strengthen the relationship between faith in religion and natural science.
Alister McGrath argues that all truth originates in "human thought" and that humans are capable of developing "…a series of truths which are universal and necessary," and this concept is called "rationalism" (McGrath, 1999, p. 58). Traditional religious writers -- and iconic authors…
Works Cited
Durbin, William A. (2003). Negotiating the Boundaries of Science and Religion: The
Conversion of Allan Sandage. Zygon, 38(1), 71-84.
Einstein, Albert. (1940). Person God Concept Causes Science-Religion Conflict. Science News Letter, 38(12), 181-182.
Evans, William. (18701). Journal of the Life and Religions Services / The Friend, Volume 44.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2011). Pantheism. Retrieved January 6, 2012, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pantheism.
Faith Integration in Nursing Leadership For the faith-based nurse, the spiritual dimension is central to nursing practice, just as clinical knowledge and technique are at the heart of the biomedical model. For the nurse leader, being active, caring and a being a supportive listener will go a long way to provide assistance in helping patient's cope with fears, anxieties, and medical history. Despite the models of patient-centered care, it is easy
In society today, we are bombarded with messages that suggest that our morality is driven by anything but the Bible. Indeed, turn on the television and images which are antithetical to Christ's word are everywhere, open the pages of a textbook and you will see pages upon pages of secular explanations of the existence of mankind; however, Matt Slick author of "What is a Christian Worldview? And Why Do
If he had love, he had no pot in which to plant it. And so it stayed trapped in his mind, separate from any object -- for Kant insisted on the gulf between faith and reason. If one had to accept certain truths on the authority of the one revealing them -- Kant wanted no part in it. According to Kant, one should accept only that which can be
Knowledge? We are often faced with a thorny predicament when asked to pit fact against faith. Such a delicate endeavor is the one posed in the question above. Reliance or submittal of evidence is most often associated with the pursuit of proof. Therefore, evidence becomes a means of achieving truth through empirical observations and objective facts. Conversely, beliefs are commonly linked to feeling and faith. While evidence is needed to
Periechontology In order to understand the underlying concepts of faith with respect to philosophy, first it is important to understand 'philosophy' adequately. Jaspers was concerned about noting the originality and singularity of philosophy and he frames it as "to elucidate" (erhellen). As per Jaspers, this clarification or elucidation does not come to philosophers through an external agent but it happens by itself during the philosophical process and this happening is an
Miracles: When Faith Contradicts Reason Theologians, and philosophers alike, have traditionally sought to bring out the relationship between reason and faith. This they have done in an attempt to clarify the link between the two terms or points-of-view -- an undertaking that involves the determination of how agents are supposed to respond to assertions drawn from either perspective, within the context of rationality. A number of scholars are of the belief