Dia (2001) noted that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is now a respected and proven model of psychotherapy, as noted by a t ask force of the American Psychological Association. In its review, the APA found that CBT "was efficacious for depression, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, obsessive compulsive disorder, substance abuse and dependence, agoraphobia, and panic disorder" (Dia 2001).

Kendall and Flannery-Schroeder (2003) examined the issue of treatment for generalized anxiety disorders in youth. Instead of attempting to determine the efficacy of one treatment or another, they wanted instead to determine whether research models were adequate to the task of determining best treatments. They noted that the methodological and design difficulties include procedural matters, as well as, importantly, accurate assessment of anxious distress by researchers and measuring treatment-produced change. Other complicating factors include treatment for comorbid conditions, or even the ingestion of other medications for unrelated medical conditions. In addition, they noted, studies involving children and medications are faced with various ethical guidelines; parents are sometimes hesitant to place their children on medication or, on the other hand, may not be willing to 'risk' having their children in a placebo group. On the other hand, eliminating placebos from studies involving pharmacologicals would also produce a biased result. Studies had shown repeatedly that "anxious adults disproportionately attend to emotionally threatening vs. neutral stimuli. Studies had also shown that among anxious children, the tendency to shift attention to emotionally threatening stimuli and away from neutral ones was present. They had also found evidence that this tendency compromised knowledge and cognitive tasks. "Consistent with previous studies, Martin et al. (1992) found that spider-fearful children were significantly slower to color-name spider-related vs. neutral words while nonfearful children showed no impairment" (Kendall and Flannery-Schroeder 2003).

Kendall and Flannery-Schroeder touched on it, but Ingersoll et al. (2004) took a more extensive look at psychotropic drugs and children in treatment for anxiety disorders. They noted that the paradigm in western medicine is still the alleviation of symptoms using psychotropic medications. They wondered what exactly should be the role of advocacy in that regard vis-a-vis the counseling professions. They were at pains to mention that pharmaceutical companies command a great deal of economic power, a possible prescription for abuse in a "society that overvalues the medical model" (Ingersoll et al. 2004). These researchers examined the possibility that advocacy counseling, which includes social action and social justice-oriented counseling, increases a client's feelings of personal power as well as fostering sociopolitical changes reflecting greater responsiveness to the client's personal needs.

While that sounds a lot like 'pie in the sky,' the authors were interested in the case of children being prescribed psychotropic medications; they found advocacy counseling can help counselors to "critically examine the shortcomings of the medical model and how counseling interventions can address the same symptoms that the medical model claims to treat" (Ingersoll et al. 2004). In short, this process can short-circuit single-minded reliance on medication to solve anxiety problems in children. These researchers also noted that the effectiveness of psychotropic medications used without additional counseling modalities for adults was also an area that would benefit from research.

While much research involves children and anxiety disorders, Myers and Harper (2004) examined a population much less studied, older adults.

They noted that their work was important because an estimated one third of individuals in that population exhibit mental health conditions that require professional intervention, including anxiety. This is an important study for counselors because, given the changes occurring in the structure of society in the United States, that is, the dramatic increase in older citizens, it is more likely than ever that professional counselors will be called on to treat older persons. Myers and Harper also noted that at present, there is a bias against older persons among service providers, compounded by reluctance by older people to seek counseling. It is paramount, then, that counselors become apprised of effective intervention practices for this population group.

Summary

The problem involved the relative merits of treating GAD with medication or counseling. A small experiment revealed that when one group was given appropriate medication but virtually no effective counseling, that group's members were not as successful at combating their GAD as were those who were given no medications but were both counseled and trained in the techniques...

Albert Ellis. They were also required to read his book, a Guide to Rational Living. Virtually all of that group made significant progress both in combating their GAD and in beginning to construct a more satisfying life. The findings of the literature review suggest that, in fact, medication is overused and, when used, works more effectively when it is paired with some form of cognitive-behavioral therapy.
Some researchers took the problem even beyond that, and investigated the effects of spirituality on ameliorating GAD. These studies, too, supported the viewpoint that, if one component is to be present, that component ought to be a form of cognitive-behavioral therapy, or even spiritual assistance. Further, one study noted the benefits of sociological frameworks for both counselor and client in coping with the underlying issues of GAD, namely feelings of powerlessness.

It cannot be overemphasized that there has been a bias toward treating all mental disorders with a pill; more than one of the researchers commented upon the inordinate value Americans place on medicine. At the same time, many researchers viewed it as an undesirable practice for a counselor to give in to the search for a pharmacological 'quick fix' when the cognitive-behavioral approaches are almost invariably more effective when used alone, while pharmacological intervention used alone has a very low likelihood of significantly altering the patient's problem.