Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from essay:
Thus, students faced with fear and stress, are overwhelmed, concentrating on the test rather than on the goals of learning. They cannot concentrate on school work, understanding the importance of learning and education, because of stress that forces some to focus only on the test and others to drop out.
III. High stakes testing disadvantages those with learning disabilities.
In addition to lowering the teaching capacity of some teachers and students' focus on the value of education, many scholars argue that high stakes testing can be harmful to those with learning disabilities. First, many argue that students with learning disabilities receive different curriculum than students without learning disabilities, making it impossible for students with learning disabilities to do well on the same tests given to their peers. Furthermore, many students do not receive the aid that they need when taking tests, such as hearing aids or visual aids, and some students are kept in environments that do not promote their learning (Cortiella 2004). Many students with learning disabilities are very bright, but the tests are designed to evaluate only those skills that they have not mastered. While this applies to all students, it is especially significant to students with learning disabilities, whose test scores are used by themselves and their parents, in come cases, to make judgements about their futures. Learning disabled students who are perfectly capable of functioning and succeeding in the classroom can be prevented from graduating because of test scores. What this does is prevent the success of capable young adults who are being told that they cannot succeed when, in reality, they can do so. Thus, students with learning disabilities often struggle when it comes to high stakes testing because schools fail to give them the tools they need to succeed.
In conclusion, high stakes testing is a practice adopted by many schools and enforced by the No Child Left Behind Act. High stakes tests are those that determine whether or not a student will advance to another grade level, graduate, or make some other significant movement. Although some people favor high stakes testing, even calling it "an extremely valuable part of educational assessment" ("Appropriate Use," 2002, para. 16), many do not believe that high stakes testing is the best way to assess students. This author proposes that high stakes testing can actually be harmful to students' learning. Students subjected to high stakes tests will encounter teachers to teach to that test instead of imparting other knowledge that the students should know, developing the students' reasoning and critical thinking skills, and basing curriculum on the climate of the classroom. In addition, students who are tested using high stakes testing, overwhelmed with stress and a fear of failure, will see the test as the end result of schooling, instead of learning or education itself as the prize. Finally, high stakes testing prevents capable students with learning disabilities from succeeding because they are not provided with the tools to succeed. While further research must be done in order to determine the academic, psychological, and other affects of high stakes testing, engaging in testing at this time is dangerous for students and teachers.
Amrein, a.L. & Berliner, D.C. (2002, March 28). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Retrieved February 22, 2009, at http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18
Appropriate Use of High-Stakes Testing in Our Nation's Schools" (2001, May).
Retrieved February 22, 2009, from the American Psychological Association. Web Site: http://www.apa.org/pubinfo/testing.html
Cortiella, C. (2004, June). Implications of High-Stakes Testing for Students with Learning Disabilities. Retrieved February 22, 2009, from Great Schools. Web Site: http://www.greatschools.net/cgi-bin/showarticle/2846
Heubert, J.P. (2002). High-stakes testing: opportunities and risks for students of color,
English-Language Learners, and students with disabilities. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved February 22, 2008, at http://www.cast.org/publications/ncac/ncac_highstakes.html
Nichols, S. (n.d.) Motivation for High Stakes Testing. Retrieved February 22, 2009 from the University of Michigan. Web Site: http://sitemaker.umich.edu/356.nichols/what_is_high_stakes_testing__nclb_
Pros and cons of NCLB: What Research Says." (2006). Retrieved February 22, 2009 from the Educational Research Newsletter. Web Site: http://www.ernweb.com/public/892.cfm[continue]
"High Stakes Testing As Detrimental" (2009, February 23) Retrieved October 23, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/high-stakes-testing-as-detrimental-24593
"High Stakes Testing As Detrimental" 23 February 2009. Web.23 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/high-stakes-testing-as-detrimental-24593>
"High Stakes Testing As Detrimental", 23 February 2009, Accessed.23 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/high-stakes-testing-as-detrimental-24593
While some suggest that high-stakes testing is an inadequate way of measuring the academic achievement and learning of most students, many also agree that high-stakes testing has severe disadvantages for special education students. Kymes points out that high-stakes testing may be a discriminatory assessment method for special needs students, placing an "unfair burden" on these students. The scholar argues that testing plans cannot be created for each and every student,
Additionally, administrators need to be trained to recognize appropriate and inappropriate test preparation strategies. Teachers also need to be trained on developing authentic assessments with the same rigor as the state assessments. Popham (2001) suggests the use of multiple measures including writing, open-ended response questions, and performance-based tasks. The use of these types of assessment may provide a more accurate picture of student learning. Additionally, the public must become
Standardized Testing is not good for Education. Standardized testing and standardized tests, when looked at for themselves are not bad things. When utilized to diagnose an issue or try to figure out if a student has learned what they have been taught then they do what they are supposed to. It is when standardized test results are utilized as the only factors to make choices regarding graduation or grade promotion,
The study had two central purposes: 1. To identify reform-related practices in mathematics instruction that have increased, decreased, or not changed since the implementation of high-stakes testing, based on educators' perceptions. 2. To determine educators' perceptions of the effects of reform-related practices on improving student achievement since the implementation of high-stakes testing. Research Questions High-stakes testing in mathematics has redefined the way teachers instruct students who underperform or learn at different rates or
Seeking support before a program is put into place is crucial, as it is this network of support that will serve to assist in solving the problems that will 6 inevitably arise. The second common roadblock is inadequate planning and scheduling for inclusion. Planning and scheduling should not only occur at the local level, but at the district level as well (Worrell 53). Often, the entire organizational structure of a district needs
"Co-enrolled classrooms," they advise, "represent a promising additional possibility for increasing student social access to peers, as well as increasing achievement. A co-enrolled classroom typically consists of an approximately 2:1 ratio of hearing and Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing (DHH) students. A team of two teachers, a general education teacher and a teacher of DHH students, collaborate to provide instruction. In many CE classrooms, the teachers and students frequently use both
According to these authorities, "Workplace stressors often have detrimental effects on faculty job satisfaction and may lead to decisions to leave the institution or to leave higher education entirely. Although some degree of turnover is inevitable and perhaps desirable, high rates of faculty turnover can be costly to the reputation of an institution and to the quality of instruction" (p. 776). In many cases, the very faculty members that