Importance Of Communication To Effective Leadership Essay

PAGES
4
WORDS
1362
Cite
Related Topics:

Level 5 Leadership Communication and leadership

Level 5 leadership: Steve Jobs

According to Jim Collins, Level 5 leadership is a kind of transformational, selfless style of leadership that few CEOs possess. Level 5 leadership is not synonymous with charisma -- although some Level 5 leaders are charismatic, some are not. Level 5 leaders "build enduring greatness" rather than merely show competency and drive and blend willfulness and fearlessness in their approach to leading people (Collins 2005:4). They can be unbending in their objectives, but their objectives always place the interests of the company first, not the flattery of their own egos. Level 5 leaders are humble enough to acknowledge the contribution of others to their success. This ability to focus on what needs to be done, rather than what will satisfy their personal wants, ensures their success at their endeavors. But this lack of egoism also means that they are not afraid of doing things that might be unpopular, if they believe such actions are necessary for the greater good of the organization. Finally, Level 5 leaders ensure that their successors are equally competent to carry on the best practices they created for the company, rather than set successors up for failure and jealously guard their past achievements (Collins 2005:7).

Steve Jobs is perhaps the most famous corporate leader of our current age. He is often called a 'genius,' a rare appellation for a CEO. Jobs was uncompromising in his pursuit of excellence and had many characteristics of a Level 5 leader. For example, Jobs always prioritized quality above market research. He gave the public what he thought it wanted, not what it said it wanted, which was often two different things. Jobs said, with a blend of confidence and arrogance: "customers don't know what they want until we've shown them" (Kazenbach 2012:1). He was also a perfectionist, and would willingly spend extra money on development if he felt a product was not in keeping with his standards. "Over the course of a year he threw out two prototypes of the iPhone before accepting...

...

However, Jobs was lacking in many of the Level 5 characteristics that Collins says are necessary for a true 'good to great' transition. Jobs never groomed a successor to fill his shoes (or his famous black turtleneck and jeans). He dictated to even the most brilliant of engineers how his products would operate, rather than listened to input that might contradict his convictions. Jobs' main focus was on getting his vision realized, not necessarily advancing the Apple brand, or rather he viewed his personal vision and Apple as synonymous. Everyone he needed to realize that vision was not treated as an equal, but as a means to an end. He was known as a 'control freak,' even dictating the shape of the company's buses and the food served at the Apple cafeteria. He maintained a "culture of strict accountability at all levels of the organization by meeting each Monday with executives to set the tone for the week. Run by a strict agenda, these meetings reviewed every single product under development" (McInerney 2011). These meetings reinforced the message that workers were constantly being monitored by Jobs.
No one can deny that Jobs was intensely focused and committed to his desire to create products that were both functional and beautiful. He was confident enough to take risks and charismatic in the sense that even when they were berated, his followers would put up with being periodically yelled at and even fired and rehired. However, he was, even by those who loved him, described as a "mercurial, demanding, and tyrannical" boss and secretive to near-paranoia, as manifested in the degree to which he withheld the release of new Apple products from the media and orchestrated their release like a tightly-controlled symphony (Kazenbach 2012:1).

Jobs was also not above in engaging in favoritism, although his personal preference for specific colleagues was based upon his assessment of their job performance, not…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Collins, Jim. (2005). Level 5 leadership. The Best of the Harvard Business Review 2001, 1-10.

Kazenbach, Jon. (2012). The Steve Jobs way. Strategy-Business, 67. Retrieved:

http://www.strategy-business.com/article/00109?gko=d331b

McInerney, Sarah. (2011). Steve Jobs: An unconventional leader. The Sydney Morning Herald.
Retrieved:http://www.smh.com.au/executive-style/management/steve-jobs-an-unconventional-leader-20111007-1lcmo.html


Cite this Document:

"Importance Of Communication To Effective Leadership" (2012, December 04) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/importance-of-communication-to-effective-106220

"Importance Of Communication To Effective Leadership" 04 December 2012. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/importance-of-communication-to-effective-106220>

"Importance Of Communication To Effective Leadership", 04 December 2012, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/importance-of-communication-to-effective-106220

Related Documents

This power can be referent, expert, legitimate, coercive, or reward in nature. Interestingly, a leader's ability to influence superiors also plays a key role in the leader's ability to influence subordinates. Altogether, a leader's ability to use power and influence can play a key role in effective leadership. References Clark, Donald. 2000. Leading & Leadership. http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/leadled.html Eisenhower, Dwight. Cited in: Famous Quotes and Quotations. Accessed March 28, 2007. http://www.famous-quotes-and-quotations.com/leadership-quotes.html Half, Robert. Cited in:

Anyone can be a manager. That is, anyone can learn to do the daily paperwork and routines necessary to function. However, leadership implies something completely different. Leadership requires self-reflection and self-assessment on a daily basis. Leaders are faced with many challenges in their daily routine. It is sometimes difficult to know when one is making the correct decision. Norman and Peale (1998) suggest using one's own emotions as a gauge

Communication and Leadership
PAGES 10 WORDS 2764

Communication and Leadership What makes a great leader? How is a great leader made? There is no single answer to that question because there are as many different kinds of great leaders as there are problems in society that need to be overcome. While certainly it is true that many important and effective leaders share a number of the same qualities, it is also imperative to remember that each leader has

leadership concepts related with the effective leadership development. It chooses and evaluates the transformational leadership style. It addresses the following questions. What are the qualities associated with transformational leadership style? How to motivate the followers? How to master communication skills? What is the importance of emotional intelligence? What is the concept of empowerment? All these concepts in respect of transformational leadership style are evaluated along with ethical issues inherent

Leadership Path Goal Theory The Boy Scouts" using the "path- goal theory Leadership theories Path Goal Theory Explain how the theory works and include an example Explain the effect of power and influence that leaders have on followers in the organization Are the followers receptive? Would you recommend another strategy? Transformational Leadership Transactional Leadership Evaluate the role of transformational and transformational leadership in the organization Effectiveness of transformational and transactional leadership in the organization Examples Assess the traits and characteristics of an effective

Leadership Can Be Taught The importance of effective leadership to organizational success is well documented, but the process by which people become leaders remains far less understood. For instance, Brandt (2002) asks, "Can those who wish to lead learn from others, or is the capacity for leadership -- or lack thereof -- hard-wired into our DNA at birth?" (p. 12). Despite the ongoing debate over nature vs. nurture continues, it is