Industrial/Economic Regulations According To The Organization For Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
1128
Cite
Related Topics:

Industrial/Economic Regulations According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) defines economic regulations (industrial regulations) as "intervening directly in market decisions such as pricing, competition, market entry, or exit ("Economic regulations," 2002). The main reason for economic regulation is because it is permits the straightforward businessman to succeed in the economy and decrease business relations within the economy from being broken by the illegal activity that takes place (Black, 2010). However, within the economy the market has four different structures that industries are classified under that the government uses to help control the advantages and limitations of supply and demand. The goal of the four structures is to look at how it "affects the outcomes in the market with impacts on the motivations, opportunities, and decisions of economic buyers and sellers through their behaviors within market competition" states Fischer (n.d.). The OECD defines social regulations as an impact on the market as well because it too helps to protect buyers and consumers by ensuring that the guidelines and policies of a business follow in order to supply flexible and easy products that are just as effective at a lower cost (2002). Monopolies

The four structures are perfect competition, duopoly, oligopoly, and monopolies. Monopolistic competition takes place when a business is the price taker over the other competitors that offer the same goods and services because it usually has some kind of advantage in that region such as where the company is located, family owned and always been around which customers have a personal relationship with the company or the location a convenience ("The four market," n.d.). There are oligopolies have a small amount of suppliers...

...

The pure monopoly market means that there is only one type of that business in an area which in most areas in the nation these markets are power, phone, satellite, cable, and water/sewage companies. Yet, last, there is a pure competition where a firm is usually only a small part of the economy and must keep many competitive prices because they have identical products to offer just like other neighboring businesses in that area ("The four market," n.d.).
The OECD also defines social regulations in the market economy that impact buyers or the public by looking at the businesses' health, safety, environmental, and social consistency to confirm a law is a necessity. The government uses these factors to plan guidelines and look at other tools like marketplace encouragement and goal-oriented advances that are effective by businesses providing the lowest possible costs to the public ("Social regulations," 2002). According to Chin-Ming Lin that in the United States the conversion from a more economic to a social regulatory marketplace showed the basic opinions of the citizens and promotional assemblies support the society's well-being rather than the business, yet policy planning and enforcement of these laws did involve some law suits against businesses that he felt were highly unnecessary (n.d.). Social regulations do benefit the public in either one of two ways because it either forbids a business from distributing harmful products and that have valuable attributes for the consumers for example like having the approved label of the Food and Drug Administration to ensure the product is safe for human consumption…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Black, W. (2010, January 11). Inside the fed's secret war on good regulation. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/23879_Page_1_19.pdf

Boyer, P. (2001). Federal regulatory agencies. The oxford companion to United States history. Retrieved May 18, 2011 from http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O119FederalRegulatoryAgencies.html

Department of Trade, Federal Trade Commission. (2011). Ftc guide to the antitrust laws. Washington, DC: Government Website. Retrieved from http://www.ftc.gov/bc/antitrust/antitrust_laws.shtm

Economic regulations. (2002, July 31). Retrieved from http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=4639
Fischer, C. (n.d.). What can economics learn from marketing's market structure analysis?. Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~bquest/1997/ecnmkt.html
Lin, C. (n.d.). Implications of American social regulations for its competitiveness in the global economy. Retrieved from http://www2.tku.edu.tw/~ti/Journal/9-2/923.pdf
Longley, R. (2011). Federal regulations. Retrieved from http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/uscongress/a/fedregulations_2.htm
Regulated industries commission. (2007, January 04). Retrieved from http://www.ric.org.tt/cms/content/view/31/39/
Social regulations. (2002, July 31). Retrieved from http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=4640
The four market structures. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://faculty.etsu.edu/hipples/MARKETS.htm


Cite this Document:

"Industrial Economic Regulations According To The Organization For" (2011, May 13) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/industrial-economic-regulations-according-85026

"Industrial Economic Regulations According To The Organization For" 13 May 2011. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/industrial-economic-regulations-according-85026>

"Industrial Economic Regulations According To The Organization For", 13 May 2011, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/industrial-economic-regulations-according-85026

Related Documents

Economic Challenges Canada Faces In recent years, the challenging economic condition in Canada has emerged as a concern for citizens, policy makers and the government alike. Canada faces challenges in terms of creating a more innovative society, as the country continues to experience a significant productivity gap compared to other advanced industrial economies. The Canadian industry appears to be slower in successfully developing, applying and marketing innovative products, processes and services

Industrial Relations Employment Relationship Industrial Relations and HRM Globalization and Industrial Relations Industrial Relations in United States of America Current Response to Globalization The paper critically examines the effects of global trade expansion on national industrial relations and how USA has responded to the changing business environment to meet its economic targets. In order to understand the impact on the national industrial relations from the rise in global trade we need to study the historical factors and

" (Spangler, 2003) In this sort of positioning, "the gains and losses will all add up to less than zero," or the original position. For example, in the case of General Motors, the entire company had to be steeply cut, in all of its departments, and in the case of the New York Transit workers, there had to be budget cuts across the board in the New York City government.

Economic History -- Japan &
PAGES 10 WORDS 3069

The government made several key policy changes to provide selected firms a strong start. Two crucial policies during this period are the import-substitution industrialization (ISI) and export promotion (EP). ISI allowed government selected firms in government target industries to borrow foreign currency, and borrow domestic funds at rates beneficial to those firms. This was the beginning of importing advanced technologies only to improve, adapt, and reproduce them for export.

Regulation and Market Structures Industrial or economic regulation can be defined as an act of government or a governmental body to regulate an industry in its entirety. Commonly the most regulates sectors include, the airline industry, banking sector, rail and road, and television broadcasting. The main aim of taking such regulatory measures is for the agency to take closer look (to monitor) on the industries' price and products to ensure

The deal was immediately criticized as anti-competitive by William Kennard, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, and by the Communications Workers of America, which represents some workers at both of the merged companies. But neither government regulators nor union bureaucrats will have the slightest impact on the latest merger. They have neither the power nor the desire to oppose the plans of the giant telecommunications monopolies. More substantial opposition