Such a basis would agree that a superior usage of technology is not near-change mechanism. Zachman argues that a communication breakdown exists in the organization (by that time) because it handled the frameworks differently. This was not in line with the requirements of a desirable organization. Further to this, communication channels inside the organization have improved and not according to Zachman's times in the 21st century. While responding to Zachman, it is good to establish whether the current approach (data modeling / and hybridism for large calls and the superior application of technology) is satisfying (Bowman, Godfrey, & Holt, 2000).
As a result, future studies should apply the future design system that will integrate Zachman's ideas into real time environment whilst acknowledging the impetus behind data modeling. The following research questions will be decisive in responding to considerate challenges.
Can data modeling be applied to respond to issues of organizational management?
Is data modeling a collective ideology, and largely does it acknowledge Zachman's original ideas?
Is there any relationship between real time technology and the quality of management?
Conclusion
This analysis has attempted to prove that Zachman information system approach (EAP) is not responsive enough in mitigating contemporary organizational problems. The underlying reason is that contemporary organizations have the considerate degree of Information Technology. However, it fails to provide a subsequent justification of Zachman's approach. In response to this, the research has provided a subsequent application of data modeling whilst issuing significant...
2006).
References
Bigot, L.L., Jamet, E., Rouet, J., & Amiel, V. (2006). Mode and modal transfer effects on Performance and discourse organization with an information retrieval dialogue system in natural language. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 467-500.
Bowman, I., Godfrey, M., & Holt, R. (2000). Connecting architecture reconstruction frameworks. Information and Software Technology, 42(2), 91-102
Huysman, M. (2000). Rethinking organizational learning: analyzing learning processes of information system designers. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 10(2), 81-99
Raeesi, M., & Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. (2013). Gis-Based System For Post-Earthquake Crisis Management Using Cellular Network. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL-1/W3, 321-325.
Simson, G. (2005, January 1). The Data Administration Newsletter -- Tdan. Comrobert S. Seiner -- Publisher. What's Wrong With The Zachman Framework? Retrieved May 9, 2014, from http://www.tdan.com/view-articles/5279/
Solotruk, M., & Kristofi?, M. (1980). Increasing the degree of information system integration and developing an integrated information system. Information & Management, 3(5), 207-212
Unno, Y., & Hosaka, R. (1994). An Examination about Easy Operation for New Medical Information Management System. The Japanese journal of ergonomics, 30(Supplement), 402-403
Zachman, J.A. (1999). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems. Journal, 38(2.3), 454-470.
