Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
The ambiguity in quantifying Information Technology's (IT's) business value, the lack of communication with the business side of the house, executives' limited understanding of and low respect for IT and IT staffers' inadequate business skills all contribute to an organization's inability to maximize their return on IT investments (Jeffery and Leliveld, 2004). IT management and governance is a discipline that is receiving lots of recent attention because it offers potential for removing many of these barriers to IT success. This paper discusses what IT management and governance is, why it is important, potential benefits, industry success rates, successful implementers, and vendor solutions. Despite potential pitfalls in organizations, surmounting these hurdles is necessary for companies to survive in an economically challenged and highly competitive environment. Just as companies manage all business processes via enterprise resource planning and other enterprise applications, businesses will begin to manage their IT operations and processes in the same disciplined manner.
IT Management and Governance Defined
IT Management is about the decisions an IT department makes (Nageshwar, 2004). Examples include deciding what IT project to invest in, which solutions and technologies to consider and which consultants and vendors to work with. Governance, on the other hand, is about the parameters within which management decisions are made. No matter how talented the management team or individuals, a good IT governance structure is required to achieve consistent results.
The major responsibilities of IT governance include (IT governance executive summary):
Taking stakeholder values into account when setting strategy
Giving direction to the processes that implement the strategy
Ensuring that processes provide measurable results
Being informed about the results and challenging them Ensuring that the results are acted upon The basic principles of IT value are delivery on time of projects that support, enable or enhance the business, within budget and with the benefits that were promised" (Williams, 2002). The value that IT adds to the business depends on whether the IT organization is aligned with the business and meets the expectations of the business. This requires constant attention, not only on the part of IT management, but also very specifically by board members and executive management in the discharge of their governance responsibilities.
Why IT Management and Governance is Important
While initially thought of as an essential productivity enhancing tool, the role of IT has become even more strategic for reducing costs, leveraging investments, enhancing products and services, enhancing executive decision making and reaching the consumer (McNurlin and Sprague, 2002). Increasingly, business goals cannot be achieved without successful IT implementations (IT governance executive summary). In most organizations the enterprise would cease to exist without IT. An enterprise's business models are based on IT for supply chain management, automation is necessary to support revenue streams and IT is required to comply with regulations and contractual service levels. And, information has become a valuable competitive asset that revolves around the use of IT to obtain and exploit it.
Firms are accustomed to using formalized approaches to manage many assets - people, money, plant and customer relationships, but information and the technologies that collect, store and disseminate information are often woefully under-managed assets (Weill and Ross, 2004). IT implementations involve both up-front and ongoing investments for outcomes that are highly uncertain. The Standish Group, an IT research firm, found that three out of ten projects fail outright, two of ten are seriously challenged, and five out of ten deliver below expectations (IT governance executive summary). In 2002, $780 billion was spent on IT in the United States alone (Jeffrey and Leliveld, 2004). During 2002 and 2003, $100 billion to $150 billion of IT projects in the United States failed.
Further, fifty percent of companies in a European survey reported that IT is just considered an operator or service supplier rather than a true business partner; sixty percent said that there was no strategy integration with the business and eighty percent believed there was no true strategic alignment (IT governance executive summary). In a research study of 130 Fortune 1000 chief information officers conducted by the Kellogg School of Management, forty-one percent of companies do not have central oversight of the IT budget, forty-six percent do not document their applications and infrastructure well, forty-seven percent do not track projects centrally, fifty-seven percent do not have criteria to define project success and sixty-eight percent do not track the benefits of projects (Jeffery and Leliveld, 2004).
The risks of bad information technology investments are just as high, if not higher, than bad financial investments (Beck and Conrad). Many experts believe that, information and decision making are more valuable than capital, which is becoming "just another commodity" in the international markets. Yet, senior management has largely turned decision making in information technology over to technologist who select and implement technology in a relative vacuum. This is a dangerous situation because these technologists are indirectly defining corporate policies. Unlike their financial counterparts, unfortunately, the impact of poor information management policies and investments isn't as observable or as measurable. This means that the damage done by inappropriate solutions can remain unrealized for years or decades, hampering organizational performance and competitiveness. CIO turnover, outsourcing, lost opportunities, and downsizing are just a few of the results of poor information investment strategies. Even more alarming, an increasing number of organizations and analysts are failing to find any relationship between IT investments and organizational success. Cost savings and improved productivity can no longer be assumed, as these promises routinely fail to be realized.
Benefits of IT Management and Governance
Off-the-shelf products vary in their capabilities to manage and govern and people, projects, and processes required to run an IT organization like a business, but the most complete offerings have an integrated suite for tacking demand management, portfolio management, program management, project management, resource management, financial management, change management, and time management (Mercury Web site).
Manage routine, high-volume work such as service requests, software defects, new employee provisioning, and project issues
Improved ability to prioritize
Govern an IT portfolio by evaluating, prioritizing, balancing, and approving both new initiatives and the existing portfolio
Capture real-time IT status automatically
Provide accurate, up-to-date information for difficult portfolio decisions
Govern the portfolio lifecycle from proposal initiation through benefits realization
Align the IT portfolio to support business strategy
Manage scope, risk, quality, issues, and schedules to improve ability to deliver programs
Deliver programs on time and on budget
Implement best-practice processes quickly.
Monitor complex, multi-project programs and drill into current project details
Enable collaboration and stakeholder alignment throughout the project lifecycle.
Manage projects by exception and track project-to-project dependencies
Integrate projects and processes, and support project collaboration.
Gain real-time project visibility into resources, processes, status, and dependencies.
Focus on highest-priority items and ensure resources are allocated appropriately.
Manage resource capacity and allocation
Make effective resource-allocation decisions.
Perform high-level resource budgeting to detailed project planning, execution, deployment, and benefits realization.
Use automatic real-time updates and an enforced process to effectively utilize resources.
Gain real-time visibility into capacity, assignments, utilization, programs, projects, costs, and overall IT demand.
Manage IT budgeting -- from project proposals, justification and review to project initiation, execution, deployment and benefits realization
Make effective portfolio decisions.
Track and compare actuals to budgets.
Align IT budgets, activities, and costs.
Plan, package, release, and deploy changes to the applications portfolio.
Automate migrations and deployments of software changes across the system landscape -- from development to test, staging, and production.
Digitize change management best practices and methodologies to uniformly plan, deploy, and manage changes.
Hide the complexity of point tools such as version control and testing, while leveraging their functionality.
Pinpoint problems quickly and roll back changes if necessary.
Streamline the end-to-end time collection and reporting process
Provide stakeholders with essential, up-to -- the minute data.
Synchronize project IDs, request IDs, and other chargeable work items across a common work and time-management system.
Improve accuracy by collecting time as work is performed.
Enforce business-rule-based timesheet review and approvals.
At a higher level, vendors of IT management and governance solutions claim that their solutions will help IT organizations run like a business, align spend with business priorities, demonstrate measurable business value, take advantage of outsourcing and other cost reduction mechanisms, and adhere to corporate governance requirements. Underlying these claims, are centralized repositories and collaboration tools that allow IT to communicate more effectively with business partners and other stakeholders to create transparency, accountability and agility.
Many industry studies quantify the benefits of IT management and governance. Weill and Ross (2004) studied 250 enterprises worldwide to gauge the IT business value directly resulting from IT management and governance. The authors found that top-performing enterprises proactively seek value from IT by:
Clarifying business strategies and the role of IT in achieving them Measuring and managing the amount spent on and the value received from IT
Assigning accountability for the organizational changes required to benefit from new IT capabilities…[continue]
"Information Technology IT Governance" (2004, July 02) Retrieved October 28, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/information-technology-it-governance-173605
"Information Technology IT Governance" 02 July 2004. Web.28 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/information-technology-it-governance-173605>
"Information Technology IT Governance", 02 July 2004, Accessed.28 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/information-technology-it-governance-173605
IT Governance and How it Helps Sustain and Extends an Organization's Strategies And Goals IT governance refers to the accountability frameworks and decision rights used to encourage desirable conduct relating to the use of information technology. It is viewed as a system used to ensure information technology decisions take into consideration the objectives and strategies of an organization (Moeller, 2013). This aids the company to ensure that key decisions conform to
This has saved many organizations literally millions of dollars by averting investments in IT programs that would have not delivered a sufficient enough return to make they valuable (Weill, Ross, 2004). IT Governance failures often manifest themselves through the lack of consistency on customer-facing strategies and a quick drop in customer satisfaction, along with ample evidence of a disconnected value chain throughout the business (Weill, Ross, 2004). The airline industry
IT Governance lays special emphasis on the system of information technology, along with the performance and risk management of the IT infrastructure in an organizational context. The primitive focus of IT Governance is the assurance of the fact that investment in the Information technology infrastructure is contributing to generate business value and at the same time lessen the potential risks pertaining to the Information Technology. This objective is attained by
IT Fraud Evaluate the factors that add to corporate fraud The business fraud can be credited to conditions emerging from deceptive monetary reporting and misappropriation of possessions. These conditions are 3 and all 3 features of the fraud triangle have to exist for fraud to take place. Management or staff members have to have the reward or pressure to dedicate fraud, see the opportunity emerge and have the ability to justify the
business organizations and environment facilitates a complex flow of information through each segment of the business corporation. It is therefore advocated that efficient and timely management of information is the backbone of all business organizations. So for the sake of acquaintance of effective information management of business records the organizations are now taking more technological approaches rather than manual ones. For that many organization have installed business software than
For example, it is no longer advisable to use a paper-based payroll, as apart from being more likely to become subject to fraud, it is an environmental hazard. Imagine the filing needs for a payroll for 100 people in one year only. Also, there's the consideration that almost everyone has and uses email. Electronic mail enables immediate correspondence between separate entities and quicker responses to urgent matters. More than this,
IT Planning Managing Risks of Large-Scale IT Projects Designing and implementing an effective online national learning system that can scale to securely support 30,000 employees across Colorado, Illinois, Florida and Texas in addition to supporting advanced professional development applications, calendaring, data uploads and downloads and social media is fraught with risks. There are many potential risks to this system both at the user adoption and technology-related levels. The intent of this analysis