Israel Wall and Effect on Economy Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

Wall on Palestinian economy and the Future of the Middle East

In April 2002, the Israeli government began building a complex series of walls, barriers, and trenches within the western border of the West Bank. The Wall is a separation barrier constructed in part by massive concrete walls, including watch towers that strike the observer (Kearney, 2003).

The Wall surrounds the Palestinian city of Qalqilya, imprisoning a population of 400,000 with eight-meter-high walls, with the single remaining access road controlled by an Israeli military base and checkpoint. At other points, the Wall consists of layers of razor wire, military patrol roads, sand paths to trace footprints, ditches, surveillance cameras and a three-meter-high electric fence in the middle. A "buffer zone" exists 30-100 meters on each side of the Wall. Palestinians are not allowed to enter this zone which consists of electric fences, trenches, cameras, sensors, and is patrolled by the Israeli military.

While gates have been included in the construction of the Wall, they are grossly insufficient and Palestinians are having a hard time crossing from one side to the other in order to access their farmland or to go to school (Kearney, 2003). According to Israeli army plans submitted to the Israeli High Court, Phase One of the Wall was to incorporate 26 "agricultural crossings" along its route, with an additional five crossings in the "depth barriers" located further to the east. In a report on the Wall however, the World Bank stated that their team found preparations for only one such crossing.

About the Wall

In a recent article, Lucy Mair and Robyn Long (2003) describe how the Wall is affecting the futures of Iraqi and Palestinian citizens. "Uncertainty about the future intensified for Mufida Ahmad's family this year when a mammoth wall ripped through their land in the West Bank village of Jayyus. Ahmad and her husband had bought the quarter acre for $1,400 -- a hefty but hopeful investment for the family of seven. On it, they cultivated eight olive trees. To pay for the land, and pay off a $4,000 bank loan they had taken to meet the family's basic needs, Ahmad worked nine hours a day in a sewing factory for a mere $150 a month. But the trees, land, and future for which they had sacrificed have all disappeared under the Israeli Separation Wall."

The Wall is referred to as "security fence" by the Israeli government and the "Apartheid Wall" by Palestinians. These different names reflect the feelings of both governments toward the Wall.

The first phase of construction was launched in June 2002 and finished just 13 months later, in July 2003. The completed section stretches for 90 miles in the northwestern West Bank districts of Jenin, Tulkarem, and Qalqiliya. At several points it cuts almost four miles into the West Bank. The Israeli government has planned three more building phases and aims to finish the structure by 2005.

Although it is relatively new, The Wall has already resulted in Israel's annexation of fertile Palestinian agricultural land, groundwater wells, and 10 illegal Israeli Jewish-only settlements.

If built in its entirety, the first, three-phase Wall alone will have enabled the largest confiscation of Palestinian land since 1967, devastate the agricultural base of the West Bank, and destroy any possibility of an economically viable Palestinian state (Mair and Long, 2003). If both walls are built, they will imprison the entire West Bank and run over 400 miles, four times the length of the Berlin Wall. They will take some of the most fertile land and richest water resources in the West Bank and partition the territory into three ghettos: one located around the cities of Nablus and Jenin in the north, a second in Ramallah in the north-center, and a third in Bethlehem/Hebron in the south. As a result, less than half of the West Bank will remain in Palestinian hands -- just 12% of pre-1948 Palestine.

The Wall will completely separate East Jerusalem, which was illegally annexed by Israel in 1980, from the rest of the West Bank. East Jerusalem is not only the planned capital of a future Palestinian state, but also the religious, cultural, social, and economic center of the West Bank. A total of 430,000 West Bank Palestinians, including those in East Jerusalem, will be imprisoned on the Israeli side of the Wall.

Palestinian Perspective

The Wall, according to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, was constructed for security purposes, and in particular to protect Israeli civilians within the Green Line from attack by Palestinian militants. However, the Wall is not just being built in this area. It is being built entirely within the West Bank and is even projected to cross through Palestinian land in the Jordan Valley near the border with Jordan.Therefore, the Wall will eventually come full circle and completely enclose two distinct and vast swathes of Palestinian territory, one to the north of Jerusalem and the other to the south. In addition, in that area of Occupied Palestinian Territory including and adjacent to East Jerusalem, labeled the "Jerusalem Envelope" by Israel, the Wall will create a third distinctive region, that will ultimately be annexed to Israel.

As a result, thousands of Palestinians between the Green Line and the Wall itself will be isolated from other communities and the Wall will annex that land to Israel (Kearney, 2003). In the words of Moayad Hussin, Mayor of the Palestinian town of Baqa al-Sharqia (McGreal, 2003), "If the fence is for security, if the fence is to keep us out, then why aren't we on the other side? With every kilometer of fence Sharon builds we are sure there is only one answer. This is not about security, it's about land and resources."

Palestinian rural society is based on an economy where agriculture is a main source of income (Yehezkel, 2002). The agricultural economy has become increasingly important during this intifada, as belligerent reoccupation, curfews, checkpoints and other forms of collective punishment and closure have isolated West Bank towns from each other, leading to more reliance on local and home produce for both immediate sustenance and employment.

The Palestinian economy is already in shambles and the completion of the Wall will undoubtedly make it much worse. The Palestinian economy was devastated by the three-year Israeli military crackdown against the intifada, mainly the enforced curfews, military destruction, and closures, which place movement restrictions on Palestinian people, vehicles, and goods. As of October 2002, closures had cost Palestinians $3.3 billion in lost income and more than two-thirds of Palestinian households living in poverty.

According to Mair and Long (2003): "The Wall will make permanent the state of siege experienced by much of Palestine during the current intifada. The full economic impact of the Wall is not yet known, but its first segment has already gutted productive assets, blocked access to resources, and hobbled people's movement."

In a nutshell, the Wall is destroying every aspect of Palestinian life -- many communities have lost valuable land, water, and resources that provide their sustenance. In addition, the Wall has caused the destruction of community and personal property. Palestinian villages and towns near the Wall are rapidly becoming isolated ghettos where movement in and out is limited, if not impossible, blocking travel for work, health, education, and visits to friends and family. For example, in the communities surrounded into an enclave in the Tulkarem district, the inability to travel due to the Wall and Israeli military "closures" has brought the unemployment rate up from 18% in 2000 to a whopping 78% in the spring of 2003. In Qalqiliya, where the Wall encloses the city with one Israeli military controlled checkpoint, nearly 10% of the 42,000 residents have been forced to leave their homes due to the city's imprisonment, closure of the market, and inability to find work.

According to Farsakh (2002): "The Wall is intended to deny any prospects for survival in communities, and therefore is not only the negation of Palestinian national aspirations and right to self-determination, but also a tool in the creeping "transfer" of the population and the realization of the Zionist/Israeli expansionist plans."

For obvious reasons, Palestinian communities and local and international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are mobilizing to stop the Wall (Mair and Long, 2003). To support these communities in their struggle, the Palestinian Environmental NGOs Network (PENGON) created the Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign in 2002. Campaign coordinator Jamal Juma' describes the campaign name this way: "We are witnessing a 21st century apartheid, which will lay siege to Palestinians within fragmented, disconnected cantons, taking final possession of the Palestinian right to live in freedom, in a state like any other people."

The campaign is a Palestinian national grassroots movement that calls for the Wall's elimination, works to educate local and international journalists, coordinates the resistance of Palestinian communities, and lobbies the Palestinian Authority to take a stance against the Wall. Supporters argue that Israel should not be allowed to steal Palestinian land and claim that it is working for peace. The…[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"Israel Wall And Effect On Economy" (2004, April 21) Retrieved December 7, 2016, from

"Israel Wall And Effect On Economy" 21 April 2004. Web.7 December. 2016. <>

"Israel Wall And Effect On Economy", 21 April 2004, Accessed.7 December. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Israel and Palestine in Order

    Many critics are of the option that the present mistrust of Palestinian intentions from the Israeli point-of-view would also not be automatically remedied by a two - state implementation. However, as commentators like Ziad Asali of Cornell University suggests, the two - state solution has to be implemented in conjunction with certain other factors and changes, in order to remotely have a chance of changing the course of this seemingly

  • Israel s Security Policies Relating to

    On October 6, 1973, Israel was attacked by the combined forces of Egypt and Syria. It was Yom Kipper, the most sacred day in the Jewish calendar. Egypt began as Israel had, with an air attack. On the ground, Israel was outnumbered six to one, fielding only about 200,000 soldiers against a combined force of over 1,150,000 Arab troops. Once again, the Soviet Union was involved, sending over 1,000 tons

  • Long Term Effects of Divorce on Children

    Long-Term Effects of Divorce on Children Research reveals divorce negatively impacts the divorcing individuals. The effects of divorce the children of divorcing parents experience, however, has not been heavily researched. Consequently, the focus for this qualitative case study examines six studies, to investigate the long-term effects of divorce on children. "A stable family situation after divorce does not erase the negative effects of a divorce, but children in this situation fare much

  • Tear Down That Wall Has Been the

    Tear down that wall," has been the one sentence legacy of Ronald Reagan's presidential administration (Boyd). Ask any conservative political pundit and you are likely to hear that Reagan's defense strategy and, in particular, his Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), was the direct cause of the Berlin Wall coming down, the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the eventual end of the Cold War. Yet, in reality, how instrumental was

  • Conflict Resolution in the Middle East

    Conflict Resolution in the Middle East History of the ARAB-ISRAELI conflict The Palestinian Arab and Jews rivalry is of recent origin that started on the eve of 20th century. Even though both of them have different religions the religious diversity is not considered to be the reasons of such rivalry. This is necessarily a struggle over the territory. The territory claimed by both the groups till 1948 was known as Palestine. However,

  • American Foreign Policy as it

    Again, the press is not aware of all that goes on in the White House behind closed doors. Just because the matter was not publicly mentioned again in a direct fashion, does not mean that it was dropped. My team and I have continually discussed the best course of action for fostering trade with Tunisia and setting a much stronger precedent in the Middle East. The WSJ has actually

  • Iran s Nuclear Threat

    Iran's Nuclear Threat: As the development of Iran's nuclear program has increased rapidly, there has been a simultaneous increase in the amount of enriched uranium that could be swiftly transformed into weapons-grade material. While Iranian leaders continue to state that the nuclear program is geared towards peaceful purposes, there are increased concerns that the development of a nuclear bomb would be a major security threat. In attempts to discourage and prevent

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved