Julius and Octavian Caesar the History of dissertation

Download this dissertation in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from dissertation:

Julius and Octavian Caesar

The history of ancient Rome is divided into eras based on the leader at the time. Two such leaders were Julius Caesar and Octavian, later Augusts, Caesar. The two men were alike in genealogy, close in time and temperament, and yet one was a pronounced success, heralded centuries and even millennia later, while the other is considered a failure when it came to creating a role for himself as sole ruler. What determines a man is successful or unsuccessful? Historically, little is considered of individual successes or failures or who gained or lost the most domains for their empire. It is the will of the people that ultimately decides which is the better man. A tyrant may be an angel if he wins over the people, so too a benefactor may become a monster. History is written by the memory of the survivors. In the case of ancient figures, what is known about them is more mythology than merit, but from what is known about the two Caesars, Octavian succeeded in setting himself as emperor and Julius Caesar was assassinated for the endeavor.

Julius Caesar ruled Rome when the empire was still a Republic with Senators and other politicians holding equal power to the one man in charge. Caesar was beloved by the people and his role as emperor was one that was given to him by the people. It was not the choice of the Senate and many of his fellow politicians felt this gave Caesar far too much power over them. Rather than allow for their Republic to become an Empire ruled by a "dictator in perpetuity." Julius Caesar was not political enough when he accepted this position. Had he been so, there is a great likelihood that he would not have been assassinated by these self-same politicians on the Ides of March.

When Julius Caesar began his political career, Rome's government was determined by elections and campaigns, much like democratic elections today. Just like modern elections, chicanery often occurred with those running for office muckraking and scandal-mongering to make his opponent look bad. Politicians were no more above the use of bribery back in the ancient times than they are today, as well. This may well have had a good deal to do with Julius Caesar's lack of success later on. With his early political successes against some strong opposition, seeds of doubt were laid that the man himself was above such dirty deeds. In fact there is evidence that Caesar did bribe a high-ranking official to file charged against his political adversary Gaius Rabirius.[footnoteRef:1] Caesar utilized his popularity with the people to ensure that no one dared to side with Gaius. [1: Suetonius, and Catharine Edwards, Lives of the Caesars. (Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008)]

In his various jobs in the government, Caesar early-on proved himself to be a supporter of the lower classes and so he got their support. One such proposal was a law which would allow for redistributing of wealth and lands to assist the poorer people of Rome. This did not go over well with some of the other politicians and subsequent attempts to reform law were given strong opposition. Those who disagreed with Caesar would find themselves on the wrong side of the executioner's wrath.[footnoteRef:2] However, this only helped build political opinion for Caesar and after defeating then-ruler Pompey, Julius Caesar was made the ruler of Rome. Upon returning to the city, Caesar was hailed as a new demigod. Attempting to create a stronger supporting government, Caesar immediately pushed forth a plethora of new laws and reforms, even against the will of the Senate. The danger of defying the other politicians is that Caesar very quickly turned opponents into starch enemies. A compatriot of Caesar's, known as Sallust warned him in a letter that, "The Fathers, by whose wisdom the wavering state was formerly steadied, are overpowered and tossed to and fro according to the caprice of others; they decree now one measure and now another, determining what is helpful or harmful to the public from the enmity or favour of their masters."[footnoteRef:3] [2: Plutarch, The Life of Caesar (75)] [3: Sallust, and John Carew Rolfe, Sallust (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1995)nt.]

Octavian Caesar, great-nephew to Julius Caesar, was far more successful in becoming a singular ruler in the Roman Empire. By the time he took over, the realm was so large that the Republic was no…[continue]

Cite This Dissertation:

"Julius And Octavian Caesar The History Of" (2010, November 30) Retrieved October 22, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/julius-and-octavian-caesar-the-history-of-122278

"Julius And Octavian Caesar The History Of" 30 November 2010. Web.22 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/julius-and-octavian-caesar-the-history-of-122278>

"Julius And Octavian Caesar The History Of", 30 November 2010, Accessed.22 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/julius-and-octavian-caesar-the-history-of-122278

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Julius Caesar and His Rise

    After Cato saw that his forces were defeated by Caesar, in traditional Roman fashion, he fell on his sword and committed suicide. Despite this great loss for the Senatorial faction, Pompey's sons Gnaeus Pompeius and Sextus Pompeius, together with Titus Labienus, Caesar's former propraetorian legate (legatus propraetore) and second in command in the Gallic War, escaped to Spain, where they continued to resist Caesar's dominance of the Roman world. Caesar

  • Octavian Augustus

    Octavian and Roman Empire Roman Empire witnessed the rise and fall of so many emperors that it is hard to decide which one of them had the greatest influence on the empire. But historians have still made an attempt to found out just which ruler proved to be most influential in consolidating the empire and they unanimously agree that Octavian was the man who can be called the greatest emperor because

  • Ancient History the Ancient Histories of Mesopotamian

    Ancient History The ancient histories of Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilizations have much in common. Both regions were inhabited since prehistoric times by nomadic groups, which began to settle down in towns and villages by around 6000 BCE. Consistent settlements soon grew into larger cities; in both Egypt and in Mesopotamia, these cities became city-states with complex lifestyles and forms of government. Some of the first written languages were created simultaneously in

  • Figures of Legend in History

    Conventional literature would come to see Cleopatra as an exploitive whore, responsible for the downfall of virtuous men like the Ptolemies, Julius Caesar and, inevitably, Marc Antony as well. So is this reported by historical accounts such as that by Cassius Dio who reflected that "Indeed she so enchanted and enthralled not only Antony but all others who counted for anything with him that she came to entertain the hope that she would rule the

  • Western Civilization Final the History

    Still one of the crucial elements in this sense was the spread of Christianity. Constantine was the one who believed in a revelation that determined him to raise his children in the Christian faith and acknowledged Christianity as a religion (Potter, 2004). The main point for this decision was the desire to unite the empire under a common belief. The Christian belief was in total opposition to the pagan

  • Rome vs Carthage History of

    Summary of the Punic Wars The Punic Wars refer to the collective names of a series of three separate wars between Carthage and Rome, which took place from 264 to 146 BC. The wars were fought between the two strongest contenders for control over the central Mediterranean Sea of the time. These wars ended with the destruction of Carthage, thus ending the city's period as an independent power and an important

  • Roman Republic Which Took Place Over a

    Roman Republic, which took place over a century from the end of the Punic Wars in 146 BC to the establishment of autocracy and military dictatorship under Julius Caesar after 45 BC, and then Octavian-Augustus from 31 BC, one of the most important questions would be: what were the main causes for its failure? There are no simple answers to that, of course, although almost certainly socioeconomic factors were

Read Full Dissertation
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved