Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
In this example, morality is decided by the gain, pleasure, and other self-interest of the individual donning the ring. Such individuals would more than likely obtain this gain by committing illicit activities, such as robbing a bank, but use their winnings for fairly self-absorbed means to further their consumption of whatever suits their fancy. Houses, cars, women and other material items would more than likely be procured, for the simple fact that the individual is sating his own personal desires. In this case there is no need to act ethically, since the bearer of the ring is outside of the judgment (both literally and figuratively) of others, whose morals no longer apply to that individual.
The Rashomon effect describes the degree of subjectivity involved in the recollection of a memory, and is what is attributed to the fact that different people may recall the same incident with conflicting descriptions of it. This concept is significant in regards to moral dialogue because a moral conversation may be had between or within subjects to distinguish what may be ethically correct or even true, similar to what takes place in the film Rashomon. The metaphor involved with "falling into a dark hell" is one in which the light of the world, which symbolizes good, is contrasted with the darkness of the world, which symbolizes evil. The fact that there is a falling into a dark hell in the film symbolizes a decidedly pessimistic view of the inhabitable world, which strongly likens it to hell.
This notion presents an interesting dichotomy with Anthony Weston's concept of care ethics, which is based on principles of benevolence that consider the interdependence upon people for one another. In the film itself, the priest and the vagabond represent morally incomplete characters for the simple fact that they are giving testimonies (which may determine the outcome of another man's life) that are conflicting and not altogether true. These same elements are represented in the Woodcutter for similar reasons, yet he makes up for stealing the dagger from the crime scene by adopting the child at the movie's conclusion, thus presenting a moral action, and ending, in a film full of ethical ambiguities.
Constructive moral dialogue, as defined in Anthony Weston's philosophical introduction to pragmatic ethics, A Practical Companion to Ethics, is a series of considerations between the self and itself or the self and others that revolves around issues of morality. Constructive moral dialogue typically deals with such practical concerns of respect and other ethical issues which Weston believes should constitute what comprises moral behavior. There are several barriers that reduce the effectiveness or even the ability for one to engage in constructive moral dialogue, the most prevalent of which is a dearth of active listening on the part of the self or the outsider whom the dialogue is taking place with. An example of such a barrier can be illustrated by a person thinking through the consequences of an issue of morality, and not paying attention to the outcome because he or she does not want to believe or actually do it.
Another such barrier is a lack of responsive caring to the outcome or the considerations being made in the moral dialogue, which prevents proper action from occurring at the conclusion of or during the duration of the dialogue. Conversational narcissism is another barrier, in which a person refuses to consider other viewpoints incongruous with his or herself. Conversely, the most effective tool for moral dialogue is a willingness to engage one's self in the debate regarding the morality of an issue, such as an external factor needed to be considered. Similarly, an issue of morality is also necessary for the development of constructive moral dialogue, which can be illustrated by a decision of whether or not to kill someone. Another effective tool conducive to moral dialogue is a value for morals itself -- meaning knowledge that some behavior is ethical while others are not, and a willingness to try to perceive that distinction before taking action.
1. Singer, Peter. How Are We To Live? (1995). New York:…[continue]
"Life A Philosophical Perspective The" (2011, May 02) Retrieved October 24, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/life-a-philosophical-perspective-the-14358
"Life A Philosophical Perspective The" 02 May 2011. Web.24 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/life-a-philosophical-perspective-the-14358>
"Life A Philosophical Perspective The", 02 May 2011, Accessed.24 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/life-a-philosophical-perspective-the-14358
However, when it comes to health-related issues, I do not believe that subjective personal impressions and feelings can influence one's ethical decision-making. The evidence is clear that smoking is harmful to the smoker, and also to the person who inhales second-hand smoke. Additionally, we were in my parents' home. I know that they have hard and fast rules about smoking on their property. My friend took a different point-of-view: he acquiesced
2306 Kant. Consider situation: You ill life support. You a transplant organs continue living. Your parents decided biological child specifically organ transplant child / matures a level (assume part organ child survive) Kant's assumption on the present matter is reflected in the well-known maxim and law, "act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law." (Stanford, 2004)
Nursing Theory: A Microscopic Perspective on the Theory-Practice Gap Jerniganm A paradigm in nursing theory exists today that equates nursing theory to a mirror, a microscope or a telescope. Meleis talks about this equation of nursing theory to a mirror, microscope, or telescope (2007). According to Meleis nursing theory that is like a mirror will reflect reality, but give it different shapes. Nursing theory that is like a microscope will focus in
Alice's interactions within her own dream help to serve as a personal unraveling of her thoughts and feelings in the real world. The philosophical implications of her experiences are many, and as the movie is viewed, it is necessary to first frame each part of the story within specific philosophies. Only then can the story be seen as both a personal exploration and realization as well as a philosophic dialogue
against Voluntary Euthanasia on Life Support In his essay, Voluntary Euthanasia: A Utilitarian Perspective, Peter Singer reviews ethical arguments regarding voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide from a utilitarian perspective. Thesis: Singer establishes a solid grounding for the ethicality of legalizing voluntary euthanasia by arguing that the human right to pursue their notion of the good should be respected. Also, he satisfactorily disposes of common objections to legalization by showing them
Existentialism is a philosophical movement that views human existence as having characteristics, such as anxiety, dread, freedom, awareness of death, and consciousness of existing, that are primary and that cannot be reduced to or explained by a natural-scientific approach or any approach that attempts to detach itself." For existentialism, human beings can be understood only from the inside and it emphasizes action, freedom, and decision as fundamental to human
Decision Making Ethics is a philosophical term derived from the Greek word "ethos," meaning character or custom (Sims, 1994, p. 16). Ethics, therefore, is not just an ethereal concept belonging to the domain of philosophers and theologists, but a universal phenomenon that pervades the very functioning of individuals and society. Indeed, ethics can be said to be the guiding set of principles, based on which individual character, social and organizational custom