Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Comrie, Reconstruction, typology and reality
Describe what grammaticalisation means, as this term is used by Comrie.
The best I can make of this -- since this writer never actually defines the term as he uses it -- is a concept that languages have a tendency to become more complex. This complexity in the way words are pronounced or the rules used to understand pronunciation seems to be what the author means by grammaticalisation.
What does Comrie mean by the "realization of the human language potential," as opposed to the development of this potential? (page 250)
It seems that the author is talking about the difference between coming to realize there is the potential to do or learn something and the actual development of whatever that something is. A friend of mine tells the story of first being shown how to knit at the age of 12. She went home and practiced with two sharpened pencils and a ball of ratty string and realized she could do it. A few years later she actually bought proper needles and yarn and a book for constant guidance. She worked at this skill and 45 years later can not only do complex work but can design her own patterns.
3) Why would one want to require that reconstructed languages have the same general typological characteristics as present day languages? What problems might arise if you don't make this assumption?
3) It would seem logical that there should be similar typological features in both reconstructed languages and current languages since, to communicate, people will have always had to get similar messages across and it would make sense features that worked to do this is old languages would be found in current languages. Without similarities to work from, linguists wouldn't know to where or how to start interpreting any new or different language.
Linguistic and Nonlinguistic Causes of why an Individual may have Difficulties in Reading. Linguistic causes of why an individual may have difficulties in reading The causes Auditory language related impairment - some individuals with reading difficulty have deficiency in distinguishing differences in sound. In a similar way, some individuals may have difficulty in detecting tones within noise Visual magnocellular-Deficit hypothesis - impairment in visual processing system may lead some word to seem incoherent and
Linguistic relativity hypothesis argues that humans see colors less with their eyes than with their language. (Fountain, 1999) The linguistic relativity hypothesis is important to help in understanding the reasoning behind the way that thought processes develop with the different cultures. The thought processes determine how language comes about and the reasons that the same word can mean different things with different cultures. In the eyes of a linguist, colors are
The man claimed that he had not met either of the two landlords in person that he had been attempting to contact for application. Thus, the man began his pursuit into legal action under the terms of racial discrimination. The case, Johnson v. Jensen, one of the first documented arguments of linguistic profiling was brought forth for consideration (Erard, 2002). As in the case of Johnson v. Jensen, the defendants
8). Follow the proceeding examples for a clearer understanding; A -- Ngi - fun - I zincwadi. NEG -- 1S.SBJ- want- NEG 10.books Translation: I don't want any books. In the urge to attain a shorter gloss, the augment appears separate. However, apart from the class 15 alone, the class prefix is always glommed onto a noun stem. For the sake of the topic discussed in this paper, only the relevant classes that affect syntactic
A similar change occurred in British in which only stressed I and us were lowered and the lowering was caused by original long a and by the final -- a in Latin loanwords. This change is not Common Insular Celtic because it postdates raising in Goidelic and raising is not Common Insular Celtic sound change." (Tristram, 2007, p.100) Tristram writes that in Goidelic "syncope is a completely regular process" which
Unlike pure slang, folkloric words tend to be less mutable and plastic in use and structure, and may last for years within the region. However, drawing a specific distinction between folkloric and linguistic definitions of slang can result in hair-splitting, rather than truly useful dichotomies of meaning. For example, throughout several generations, children may use the same types of "specialized language" to refer to childhood pursuits, such as names for