Moral Skepticism and Knowledge Moral Skepticism and Moral Knowledge

Morality is a much debated philosophical idea, wherein the arguments range from ethical egoism being the perfect sample of moral ethics to altruism being the perfect -- and otherwise opposite -- viewpoint. Both ideas have strong followings, and ethical egoism along is broadened to even more branches within philosophical studies. There is still much reconciliation to be done between the various problems of philosophical thought and ethical egoism or lack thereof.

Ethical Egoism

Ethical egoism is a particular form of egoism where one who is moral "ought" to do what is in one's self-interest. The morality behind egoism generally points toward the idea of self-interest; that a moral being's moral path is by focusing on one's self. This type of egoism should not be mistaken for psychological egoism, however. Psychological egoism makes a claim that beings act only in their self-interest. Ethical egoism plainly states a choice. In psychological egoism, a person's morality is no longer in question; it doesn't matter if one is moral or not, one acts solely for one's self-interest regardless. The ethical egoist, on the other hand, believes that one's morality is at play; the moral person acts in self-interest while the immoral one does not.

Many proponents of ethical egoism -- among them Ayn Rand, Leonard Peikoff, David L. Norton, and Max Stirner -- have argued that it would be best to act upon one's own wants and needs; they claim...

In fact, why attempt to pursue the wants and needs of another when there is the chance of falling short on effectiveness? It is much easier to act upon what one wants and needs than it is to figure out what the other person wants and needs. A second argument regarding the favoring of ethical egoism falls upon the ineffectiveness of altruism. To the egoists, altruism denies the chance of pursuit of happiness, that the philosophy itself calls upon the viewpoint that life is merely a sacrifice. Rand writes that "the basic principle of altruism is that man has no right to exist for his own sake…that self-sacrifice is his highest moral duty, virtue or value" (Rand).
That is not to say that ethical egoism has no antagonists. Thomas Jefferson writes that "self-interest, or rather self-love, or egoism, has been more plausibly substituted as the basis of morality" (Jefferson). Many altruistic philosophers believe that ethical egoism is the entire point of immorality; ethical egoism serves as a problem when it comes to the conflict of interest. There is no moral basis when arbitration becomes skewed to one's bias and self-interest. Furthermore, how does one reconcile the paradox wherein an individual acts in his own self-interest, preventing another to do the same? Which man becomes morally correct?

2. Is-Ought and Demarcation

In the attempt to reconcile ethical egoism with morality, the is-ought…